A mechanical engineer who worked on the f-18 fighter jet program for General Dynamics saw the ‘89 doc
For some reason, engineers can be the most gullible
victims of supernatural cons, usually at a more
mature age. Perhaps a subconscious reaction to a life
in the no-nonsense world of reason and numbers, I don't know.
found Chang, and trained under him for a decade before writing that book to tell the story to the west, like the video attempts to.
I found books on Chang with google, and also on the
practice, i.e. mo pai nei kung. The ten years of training
give his account weight, if legit.
scientists
Some scientists are also gullible, if James Randi is to
be believed, what he probably is.
None of the debunks work
Not sure if I would trust my own eyes if I had met
John Chang in person.
Human potential grows by magnitudes when you accept the validity in what is demonstrated by Chang and others.
Acceptance is independet from the demonstrated human
potential. If I could set newspapers ablaze with bare
hands or heal tinnitus I would give a damn about what
other people think. To John Chang's credit, he apparently
gives a damn about that.
and thousands of years, Traditional Chinese Medicine was able to “stumble” on some real cures?
Stumble? They researched it systematically. They even
kept the records of what did NOT work. That's patently
scientific, even if you don't ignore the fact that they were
not interested in researching the underlying physics
or neurology.
That's what makes the whole thing somewhat plausible.
(Why haven't doctors researched this, people may ask, if
legit?
Perhaps for the same reason doctors have not researched
medical cannabis. I met with a rogue doctor's
encounter/alumni group of cancer- and rheuma patients
for political reasons, without expecting much from that.
Un-fucking-believable. Most of them had resorted to oil
and reefers as a hail mary pass, in the face of more or
less certain death. Results within days.
And a dealer-friend of mine showed
me a video recorded by an epileptic customer and his
mother who anointed him on the chest, what stopped a hard seizure (think Pris' final moments in bladerunner) in
ca. 20 seconds. The most stunning and undeniable,
personally witnessed, results-within-in-minutes account
would dox me, but cannabis as medication is realrealreal.)
Kannehbosem, the holy anointing oil... you seem open to new ideas which is great, I wouldn’t put people like Randi (or Shermer, or West, or Nye, or Tyson, or ...) on too high a pedestal. Science is our greatest tool for finding our way in the dark, but we can’t let it become a dogmatic belief system. That just leads to disgraces like Sheldrake, Schoch, Hancock et al, and so on. Great thinkers smeared and suppressed for “woowoo” (one of the most mentally subversive and worthless terms in the last 20 years)
Edit:also, I agree re: TCM, that’s why I called “trial and error” western derision and put “stumbled” in quotes. It’s as scientific as the internal alchemy practiced by Chang and his 2000+ year old lineage.
For some reason, engineers can be the most gullible victims of supernatural cons, usually at a more mature age. Perhaps a subconscious reaction to a life in the no-nonsense world of reason and numbers, I don't know.
I found books on Chang with google, and also on the practice, i.e. mo pai nei kung. The ten years of training give his account weight, if legit.
Some scientists are also gullible, if James Randi is to be believed, what he probably is.
Not sure if I would trust my own eyes if I had met John Chang in person.
Acceptance is independet from the demonstrated human potential. If I could set newspapers ablaze with bare hands or heal tinnitus I would give a damn about what other people think. To John Chang's credit, he apparently gives a damn about that.
Stumble? They researched it systematically. They even kept the records of what did NOT work. That's patently scientific, even if you don't ignore the fact that they were not interested in researching the underlying physics or neurology.
That's what makes the whole thing somewhat plausible.
(Why haven't doctors researched this, people may ask, if legit?
Perhaps for the same reason doctors have not researched medical cannabis. I met with a rogue doctor's encounter/alumni group of cancer- and rheuma patients for political reasons, without expecting much from that. Un-fucking-believable. Most of them had resorted to oil and reefers as a hail mary pass, in the face of more or less certain death. Results within days. And a dealer-friend of mine showed me a video recorded by an epileptic customer and his mother who anointed him on the chest, what stopped a hard seizure (think Pris' final moments in bladerunner) in ca. 20 seconds. The most stunning and undeniable, personally witnessed, results-within-in-minutes account would dox me, but cannabis as medication is realrealreal.)
Kannehbosem, the holy anointing oil... you seem open to new ideas which is great, I wouldn’t put people like Randi (or Shermer, or West, or Nye, or Tyson, or ...) on too high a pedestal. Science is our greatest tool for finding our way in the dark, but we can’t let it become a dogmatic belief system. That just leads to disgraces like Sheldrake, Schoch, Hancock et al, and so on. Great thinkers smeared and suppressed for “woowoo” (one of the most mentally subversive and worthless terms in the last 20 years)
Edit:also, I agree re: TCM, that’s why I called “trial and error” western derision and put “stumbled” in quotes. It’s as scientific as the internal alchemy practiced by Chang and his 2000+ year old lineage.