All those pictures are HEAVILY processed, through either photoshop or NASA composite software.
If any pictures are real, it would be the ones taken in the 1960s. No such thing as digital manipulation back then. It would have to go through a similar process of the visual effects model work like the films back then.
Even then it would ALL have to be done in camera, no compositing or rotoscoping at all. It would break the illusion and there would be more film grain, and jagged edges of the matte for the composite. Depending on what film would be used for photographing too. Still imagery is much easier to fake than motion photography.
Kodak had some government contracts with the NRO for the Gambit and Hexagon satellites back in the day, so it wouldn't be too far fetched that they would work with government in faking imagery even back then. But one thing, the Soviets would call us out on our BS if a lot of our space program was faked.
I think to a degree there is faking of the missions, but it would be of much greater value to just keep what we are doing a secret instead of totally faking every damn thing that is done in public.
I've seen so many rocket launches, been in clean rooms, hung out with engineers and astronauts that worked and continue to work on these projects. I've seen so many satellites upfront. No, that shit is NOT faked. What they do may be classified but the hardware is VERY real and it does something that we are not in the know.
atlantis is at the north pole, something fishty going on at the south too though seems more evil than what ever lies in the artic, ANT-artic iss where the antichirst comes, and the further you are to north pole, atlantis, hidden realms, the more pure you are, fair skinned, the evidence is on google earth for the north pole, circular rings of hollow earth..known at atlantis, but leades to agarthur and many worlds....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQqX2ncsC-M
Point 7 not true anymore, and never was. To me, this is a Mandela Effect. Antarctica was closed off unless you had 'permission' to go. Now, anyone can go there for vacation, and they ALWAYS have been allowed to. There's a thriving cottage industry in Argentina taking people down during the summer. Any of us can head down there and hop a boat to Antarctica. To me - this is mindblowing. Not that we're allowed to go now, but that we've always been allowed to go there. It's never been closed.
I believe we are only limited by our means of travel. Since there are no roads to drive on, you would need to either secure some form of ground or air transport. Many people go hiking and backpacking every year, and then post their travel photos. Pretty sure you can get dropped off and freely walk south until you freeze to death. South pole much much colder than north pole due to land being below freezing vs ocean which can’t get below 0c underneath the ice. South pole has never even reached 0c (at least since measurements have been recorded).
Since supposedly apollo happened, no one has yet figured out a way to get past the Van Allen radiation belts. Interestingly, there's a couple weird things about that wikipedia article.
I'm pretty sure the part about the apollo missions in BS, and that radiation would be deadly to humans. There's many other great sources on this, the documentary American Moon covers this well.
It appears as though you would be able to avoid these belts by taking off from either the north or south poles. For some reason, this isn't discussed anywhere in the article. Which makes the fact that Antarctica is off limits to humans even more questionable. Perhaps it is possible to leave earth, but they're hiding it from us. But if that were true, why would they have faked the moon missions??
Why would they use rockets when we have airplanes and an atmosphere that allows us to glide, given enough speed.
The rockets go up, then they have to curve because of very simple physics, because that's how space supposedly works (I realize that the case could be made for physics being a lie, but then it wouldn't be reproducible by people all around the globe (heh)).
It’s real. The nazi got there already, they drive over the snow plains. Fuck knows what earth really is, but there is much more then we know. We won’t ever be able to explore those parts. I feel the elite go there and rub it in our faces, they film in these locations and how would you know? It’s ‘another world out there’
atlantis is at the north pole, something fishty going on at the south too though seems more evil than what ever lies in the artic, ANT-artic iss where the antichirst comes, and the further you are to north pole, atlantis, hidden realms, the more pure you are, fair skinned, the evidence is on google earth for the north pole, circular rings of hollow earth..known at atlantis, but leades to agarthur and many worlds.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQqX2ncsC-M
Seriously, I respect conspiracies, but be a critical thinker. Expand thought, use logic, and use definitions.
Expand upon constants, and work within testable facts. Not just fairy tale bullshit
This chinese map, shows longitude lines, meaning spherical. They could be outer space objects, alien craft, or large islands. Might be many things. But they have the contin3nts spread in a way that displays a globe.
Simple explanations help, but expanding on what is available.
This map shows the continents arranged in a circular fashion just like a globe drawn flat. Open and shut.
Well for one, the way it is depicted, is circular. Secondly, it shows that all continents convirge in the middle, which is the north of thd glibe, the are much further spread out below, same with the globe. China is in the northern hemisphere, they have a detailed map of the continents above a certain lattitude.
But, Antartica is in almost unattainable waters without sufficient supplies and technology. It is very cold, even for modern technology and thermal wear. Icecaps are more present, and sailing that far south, well you see not much of anything for much further. To discover australia, there is many island chains in between.
So imagine your an explorer, you keep seeing islands, you keep exploring. So that is much more likely.
Lets go further. The waters of the southern tip, horn, or Africa, are among the worst on the planet. This is a very detrimental factor to enthusiasm to traveling further down.
Again, indonesia in a very real way, points to Australia in a nautical way.
Antartica is a plausable thing these islands could be. It could be that they approached it many times, at many different angles of travel, and did not understand that it was the bottom most continent.
Lets go even further. There is no viable food source or fuel source on antartica. So it must be brought there. Since it is on the bottom of the globe, and these peoples obviously encircled the continents, each approach from a different continent, could yield a new large island.
If they were not to understand a globe, then it could easily be that. If you are simply trying to figure out the continent, it would be easy to do that.
The main take away from this map however, is that circular arangement. The continents converge closer to each other in the northern hemisphere, and the southern hemisphere has more open space.
This map shows exactly that.
It would be a case of confirmation bias to assume it is a flat earth because it does not say sphere on the side.
I can really go into hundreds of arguments, have a solid point in all of them.
You can see the curvature of the earth in just the clouds, simple.
Have you ever been on top of a mountain, looked far. If you are on top of mt rainier, you cannot, no matter what, see mt shasta. If it were flat, you absolutely could. Especially because those two volcanoes are the tallest in on either point, in a ljnear trajectory.
If the world was flat. You would be able to see any point on the earth from mt everest. You would only need a telescope. The fact you cannot see mountains further, or taller ones thousands of miles away, is because of curvature.
Not exactly true. If we lived in a vacuum you would be able to see these great distances. The fact that our atmosphere is full of stuff (oxygen, CO2, nitrogen, lots of water vapor, smog) makes visibility beyond X miles not possible. Sorry I don't know the X, but I've seen it before. And of course it varies based on local conditions for air clarity. That being said - I could believe in undisclosed land masses before I can believe in a flat earth.
Ok flat earthers. Go ahead and be that it is easy to test the curvature. You can see it in the clouds. You can test it on a lake, and all other celestial bodies are spherical. Why would earth be the one non-spherical large mass in the solar system?
The way it is displayed. So lets take a beach ball, and you want to see it all on a flat surface. You cut it in four corners, then lay it flat. This is done in that way. So it is spread out as such.
These explorers even included lattitude lines, circular too. And they show the space on top the artic ocean.
Also gravity just makes things spherical, that is what happens to a magnet surrounded by iron flakes.
Already saw your disinfo on being able to see for infinite amounts of distance through our water vapor atmosphere. Grow up man. If you are gonna argue with the flat earthers you will need to do much better. While I don't agree with them, they know their shit and will chew you up and spit you out with false proofs like this.
A sphere is the simplest object for a macro object.
Gravity, magnetism, polar covalent forces, all tend to form spherical shapes.
If your a science professor, is there more than 2 genders..... lol, science is dead. Just like the big bang, all religious prapaganda.
I do not respect your scientific mind.
Anyone who believes, we, organisms made up of cells, that are not flat, sitting on continents, floating on magma, are somehow in an existence of a plane.
I am perplexed you claim to be a science professor. Then again, scientists claim covid is dangerous and we should wear face suffocators.
We have plenty if real pictures. You are out of your mind.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/best-photos-earth-moon-from-deep-space-2017-3%3famp
All those pictures are HEAVILY processed, through either photoshop or NASA composite software.
If any pictures are real, it would be the ones taken in the 1960s. No such thing as digital manipulation back then. It would have to go through a similar process of the visual effects model work like the films back then.
Even then it would ALL have to be done in camera, no compositing or rotoscoping at all. It would break the illusion and there would be more film grain, and jagged edges of the matte for the composite. Depending on what film would be used for photographing too. Still imagery is much easier to fake than motion photography.
Kodak had some government contracts with the NRO for the Gambit and Hexagon satellites back in the day, so it wouldn't be too far fetched that they would work with government in faking imagery even back then. But one thing, the Soviets would call us out on our BS if a lot of our space program was faked.
I think to a degree there is faking of the missions, but it would be of much greater value to just keep what we are doing a secret instead of totally faking every damn thing that is done in public.
I've seen so many rocket launches, been in clean rooms, hung out with engineers and astronauts that worked and continue to work on these projects. I've seen so many satellites upfront. No, that shit is NOT faked. What they do may be classified but the hardware is VERY real and it does something that we are not in the know.
PDF Link to the NRO and Kodak:
https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/history/csnr/gambhex/Docs/Perry_Gambit_Hexagon_History_single_pages.pdf
atlantis is at the north pole, something fishty going on at the south too though seems more evil than what ever lies in the artic, ANT-artic iss where the antichirst comes, and the further you are to north pole, atlantis, hidden realms, the more pure you are, fair skinned, the evidence is on google earth for the north pole, circular rings of hollow earth..known at atlantis, but leades to agarthur and many worlds....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQqX2ncsC-M
This comment right here. For those of you wanting to know more, start here. Great list.
Point 7 not true anymore, and never was. To me, this is a Mandela Effect. Antarctica was closed off unless you had 'permission' to go. Now, anyone can go there for vacation, and they ALWAYS have been allowed to. There's a thriving cottage industry in Argentina taking people down during the summer. Any of us can head down there and hop a boat to Antarctica. To me - this is mindblowing. Not that we're allowed to go now, but that we've always been allowed to go there. It's never been closed.
I believe we are only limited by our means of travel. Since there are no roads to drive on, you would need to either secure some form of ground or air transport. Many people go hiking and backpacking every year, and then post their travel photos. Pretty sure you can get dropped off and freely walk south until you freeze to death. South pole much much colder than north pole due to land being below freezing vs ocean which can’t get below 0c underneath the ice. South pole has never even reached 0c (at least since measurements have been recorded).
OP is not a faggot
But seriously, I think this is worth looking in to I will deep dive
Since supposedly apollo happened, no one has yet figured out a way to get past the Van Allen radiation belts. Interestingly, there's a couple weird things about that wikipedia article.
I'm pretty sure the part about the apollo missions in BS, and that radiation would be deadly to humans. There's many other great sources on this, the documentary American Moon covers this well.
It appears as though you would be able to avoid these belts by taking off from either the north or south poles. For some reason, this isn't discussed anywhere in the article. Which makes the fact that Antarctica is off limits to humans even more questionable. Perhaps it is possible to leave earth, but they're hiding it from us. But if that were true, why would they have faked the moon missions??
Antarctica has never been offlimits for humans. Spend a few minutes online and book a trip!
To me this is a Mandela Effect. I clearly remember it being off limits, but now - it never has been off limits. Anyone can go whenever they want.
Why would they use rockets when we have airplanes and an atmosphere that allows us to glide, given enough speed.
The rockets go up, then they have to curve because of very simple physics, because that's how space supposedly works (I realize that the case could be made for physics being a lie, but then it wouldn't be reproducible by people all around the globe (heh)).
Interesting theory. Back in the '60 Wernher von Braun originally wanted his rocket idea for sending cargo to different continents.
I can't find the exact clip he talks about it, but he did talk about it in the Walt Disney presents series.
Here is a clip of him talking about moon missions from the same series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjs3nBfyIwM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zcU85O82XE
It’s real. The nazi got there already, they drive over the snow plains. Fuck knows what earth really is, but there is much more then we know. We won’t ever be able to explore those parts. I feel the elite go there and rub it in our faces, they film in these locations and how would you know? It’s ‘another world out there’
atlantis is at the north pole, something fishty going on at the south too though seems more evil than what ever lies in the artic, ANT-artic iss where the antichirst comes, and the further you are to north pole, atlantis, hidden realms, the more pure you are, fair skinned, the evidence is on google earth for the north pole, circular rings of hollow earth..known at atlantis, but leades to agarthur and many worlds.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQqX2ncsC-M
Seriously, I respect conspiracies, but be a critical thinker. Expand thought, use logic, and use definitions.
Expand upon constants, and work within testable facts. Not just fairy tale bullshit
This chinese map, shows longitude lines, meaning spherical. They could be outer space objects, alien craft, or large islands. Might be many things. But they have the contin3nts spread in a way that displays a globe.
Simple explanations help, but expanding on what is available.
This map shows the continents arranged in a circular fashion just like a globe drawn flat. Open and shut.
Well for one, the way it is depicted, is circular. Secondly, it shows that all continents convirge in the middle, which is the north of thd glibe, the are much further spread out below, same with the globe. China is in the northern hemisphere, they have a detailed map of the continents above a certain lattitude.
But, Antartica is in almost unattainable waters without sufficient supplies and technology. It is very cold, even for modern technology and thermal wear. Icecaps are more present, and sailing that far south, well you see not much of anything for much further. To discover australia, there is many island chains in between.
So imagine your an explorer, you keep seeing islands, you keep exploring. So that is much more likely.
Lets go further. The waters of the southern tip, horn, or Africa, are among the worst on the planet. This is a very detrimental factor to enthusiasm to traveling further down.
Again, indonesia in a very real way, points to Australia in a nautical way.
Antartica is a plausable thing these islands could be. It could be that they approached it many times, at many different angles of travel, and did not understand that it was the bottom most continent.
Lets go even further. There is no viable food source or fuel source on antartica. So it must be brought there. Since it is on the bottom of the globe, and these peoples obviously encircled the continents, each approach from a different continent, could yield a new large island.
If they were not to understand a globe, then it could easily be that. If you are simply trying to figure out the continent, it would be easy to do that.
The main take away from this map however, is that circular arangement. The continents converge closer to each other in the northern hemisphere, and the southern hemisphere has more open space.
This map shows exactly that.
It would be a case of confirmation bias to assume it is a flat earth because it does not say sphere on the side.
I am not assuming a map is a sphere. If you make a spere, to be displayed on a map, to show it in all angles, this is how you do it.
I can really go into hundreds of arguments, have a solid point in all of them.
You can see the curvature of the earth in just the clouds, simple.
Have you ever been on top of a mountain, looked far. If you are on top of mt rainier, you cannot, no matter what, see mt shasta. If it were flat, you absolutely could. Especially because those two volcanoes are the tallest in on either point, in a ljnear trajectory.
If the world was flat. You would be able to see any point on the earth from mt everest. You would only need a telescope. The fact you cannot see mountains further, or taller ones thousands of miles away, is because of curvature.
Not exactly true. If we lived in a vacuum you would be able to see these great distances. The fact that our atmosphere is full of stuff (oxygen, CO2, nitrogen, lots of water vapor, smog) makes visibility beyond X miles not possible. Sorry I don't know the X, but I've seen it before. And of course it varies based on local conditions for air clarity. That being said - I could believe in undisclosed land masses before I can believe in a flat earth.
Ok flat earthers. Go ahead and be that it is easy to test the curvature. You can see it in the clouds. You can test it on a lake, and all other celestial bodies are spherical. Why would earth be the one non-spherical large mass in the solar system?
The way it is displayed. So lets take a beach ball, and you want to see it all on a flat surface. You cut it in four corners, then lay it flat. This is done in that way. So it is spread out as such.
These explorers even included lattitude lines, circular too. And they show the space on top the artic ocean.
Also gravity just makes things spherical, that is what happens to a magnet surrounded by iron flakes.
Many things are just simple, and easily testable
That map shows a sphere
If you only like to here positive info. That is confirmation bias. Yes so there is no reason to discuss further.
Already saw your disinfo on being able to see for infinite amounts of distance through our water vapor atmosphere. Grow up man. If you are gonna argue with the flat earthers you will need to do much better. While I don't agree with them, they know their shit and will chew you up and spit you out with false proofs like this.
You do not know chemistry and physics. Why is the moon spherical, why is jupiter spherical, why is all the planets spherical, why is a star spherical.
Give me your best answer to that.
Then give me your FE argument.
A sphere is the simplest object for a macro object.
Gravity, magnetism, polar covalent forces, all tend to form spherical shapes.
If your a science professor, is there more than 2 genders..... lol, science is dead. Just like the big bang, all religious prapaganda.
I do not respect your scientific mind.
Anyone who believes, we, organisms made up of cells, that are not flat, sitting on continents, floating on magma, are somehow in an existence of a plane.
I am perplexed you claim to be a science professor. Then again, scientists claim covid is dangerous and we should wear face suffocators.
The earth is a pear shape
Do you realize the second dimmension does not exist. There is no such thing
Even photons are three dimmensional, quarks, everything in existence is 3 dimmensional.
The second dimmendion is stupid to talk about.