Not saying "I know more", but I've looked through a lot of the article now, and the gut knows history but not physics. For example, in the second installment, he takes issue with the heating cooling system in the LEM. First, you don't need a heater. The LEM was like a thermos bottle in near vacuum. Body and equipment heat would have been enough. Second, cooling was supposedly accomplished through water sublimation. Pump water to some external plates and it sublimates away taking heat with it. I'm not saying NASA couldn't lie about it, but you can't use it as proof that LEM temp control was impossible as the author does.
Once again you're taking things and stripping them of all context. The LEM wouldn't need a heater? lmfao? you would go to space without a way to generate heat on the assumption that "well my car is like a thermos so I'll never NOT be hot.
idk bro questionable. Have you watched American Moon?
I'm open to NASA being a bunch of liars, and I do think there's evidence that something weird went on with the Apollo missions. I'm just saying that guy's arguments are questionable.
Your comparison of a car acting like a Thermos is a perfect example of scientific misunderstanding. A car is not like a Thermos because we have an atmosphere on Earth, so convection from the air quickly equalizes the temperature inside and out.
But in thevarticle, the author is assuming the LEM behaves like a car on Earth even though the moon had no atmosphere. This is why the LEM behaves differently from a car on Earth.
Haven't seen American Moon, but I've watched a bunch of moon hoax docs. Honestly, most of my personal doubt comes from that post-return presser where the astronauts are acting really weird.
Not saying "I know more", but I've looked through a lot of the article now, and the gut knows history but not physics. For example, in the second installment, he takes issue with the heating cooling system in the LEM. First, you don't need a heater. The LEM was like a thermos bottle in near vacuum. Body and equipment heat would have been enough. Second, cooling was supposedly accomplished through water sublimation. Pump water to some external plates and it sublimates away taking heat with it. I'm not saying NASA couldn't lie about it, but you can't use it as proof that LEM temp control was impossible as the author does.
https://www.messie2vie.fr/bible/strongs/strong-hebrew-H5377-nasha.html
Nasa - to deceive
Once again you're taking things and stripping them of all context. The LEM wouldn't need a heater? lmfao? you would go to space without a way to generate heat on the assumption that "well my car is like a thermos so I'll never NOT be hot.
idk bro questionable. Have you watched American Moon?
I'm open to NASA being a bunch of liars, and I do think there's evidence that something weird went on with the Apollo missions. I'm just saying that guy's arguments are questionable.
Your comparison of a car acting like a Thermos is a perfect example of scientific misunderstanding. A car is not like a Thermos because we have an atmosphere on Earth, so convection from the air quickly equalizes the temperature inside and out.
But in thevarticle, the author is assuming the LEM behaves like a car on Earth even though the moon had no atmosphere. This is why the LEM behaves differently from a car on Earth.
Haven't seen American Moon, but I've watched a bunch of moon hoax docs. Honestly, most of my personal doubt comes from that post-return presser where the astronauts are acting really weird.