*Able, according to modern NASA engineers they have to solve how to get through the Van Allen radiation belt if they're to send someone to the moon or mars. Why do they need to solve that? They did it with 60's technology.
Also according to those same people the radiation should be so strong with the lack of protection the old craft had that it would have killed the astronauts shortly after. Being sterile would be the least of their worries.
Have you ever looked at a picture of the lunar lander? It's literally put together with duct tape. You think that piece of junk adequately shielded astronauts from space debris and deadly amounts of radiation?
Did you read the article???
*Able, according to modern NASA engineers they have to solve how to get through the Van Allen radiation belt if they're to send someone to the moon or mars. Why do they need to solve that? They did it with 60's technology.
Also according to those same people the radiation should be so strong with the lack of protection the old craft had that it would have killed the astronauts shortly after. Being sterile would be the least of their worries.
Have you ever looked at a picture of the lunar lander? It's literally put together with duct tape. You think that piece of junk adequately shielded astronauts from space debris and deadly amounts of radiation?
So you admit I'm on topic,
you just unhappy I'm not traveling in the direction that you want.
So you're saying they chose men who were sterile to cover the effects radiation would have so that their story is more believable?
I mean that wouldn't surprise me, I also wouldn't be surprised if the government sterilized them by force.
It also explains why they refused to let Chuck Yeager into the space program.
Welp pack it up lads, that great mystery of mysteries has been solved.
You’re not really debunking the guys argument, you’re just giving us a theory with less evidence to support it than the main one in the OP link.