Simple question. Do you love fake news? Because I just corrected fucking OBVIOUS mistake here, even from the mother fucking article. I didn't take a side. I stayed neutral and pointed out a fact. What the fuck is wrong with that?
Do you hate the truth? I'm at a fucking loss for words here. Do you only want to hear about bullshit that validates you even if it's a lie?
SERIOUSLY, since you haven't answered and I'm pissed now, how the FUCK is pointing out that it's fucking straight up wrong, even from the words the fucking guy posted, that I'm intellectually dishonest for what I said.
PLEASE fucking explain that to me. I'm 100% honest and curious how you could interpret what I said as dishonest.
Educate me asshole. Or are you the dishonest one?
Point out the fucking lie.
You gaslighting motherfuckers are the worst. I am factually correct here by ANY METRIC and you're trying to make me seem like I'm crazy. That's fucking bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit and fuck you.
This free speech thing is great I can finally speak my mind and call out you disingenuous mother fuckers that accuse me of being a shill with no convictions.
Good. Be mad faggot. You think there’s some sort of meaningful distinction between brother-in law and brother of brother-in-law in the context of the nepotism and shadiness involved here? That’s only because you’re a disingenuous quibbling bitch. Your low test levels are evident from your hilariously bitchy posts.
How so, is the title true? Or am I correct in saying that it's not his brother in law?
Come on man.
I'm getting downvoted for literally the truth. The guy himself says it's the brother of his brother in law, but says in the title it's his brother in law. AKA misleading. It's not much better to be honest, but there is a difference and when trying to make a point, why be innaccurate?
Just say it's the brother of the brother in law and I'd have no problem with this. Is that so unfair?
Ooooh yeah that TOTALLY invalidates the point of the post. Totes. /s
This guy should work for Snopes.com!
Simple question. Do you love fake news? Because I just corrected fucking OBVIOUS mistake here, even from the mother fucking article. I didn't take a side. I stayed neutral and pointed out a fact. What the fuck is wrong with that?
Do you hate the truth? I'm at a fucking loss for words here. Do you only want to hear about bullshit that validates you even if it's a lie?
Well, the title is a fucking lie, so lets start there. What else is a lie then? Who cartes if it's fucking fake news right?
So fucking retarded.
You’re so fucking intellectually dishonest.
SERIOUSLY, since you haven't answered and I'm pissed now, how the FUCK is pointing out that it's fucking straight up wrong, even from the words the fucking guy posted, that I'm intellectually dishonest for what I said.
PLEASE fucking explain that to me. I'm 100% honest and curious how you could interpret what I said as dishonest.
Educate me asshole. Or are you the dishonest one?
Point out the fucking lie.
You gaslighting motherfuckers are the worst. I am factually correct here by ANY METRIC and you're trying to make me seem like I'm crazy. That's fucking bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit and fuck you.
This free speech thing is great I can finally speak my mind and call out you disingenuous mother fuckers that accuse me of being a shill with no convictions.
Good. Be mad faggot. You think there’s some sort of meaningful distinction between brother-in law and brother of brother-in-law in the context of the nepotism and shadiness involved here? That’s only because you’re a disingenuous quibbling bitch. Your low test levels are evident from your hilariously bitchy posts.
How so, is the title true? Or am I correct in saying that it's not his brother in law?
Come on man.
I'm getting downvoted for literally the truth. The guy himself says it's the brother of his brother in law, but says in the title it's his brother in law. AKA misleading. It's not much better to be honest, but there is a difference and when trying to make a point, why be innaccurate?
Just say it's the brother of the brother in law and I'd have no problem with this. Is that so unfair?