3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
Clobro -
I hear they suck little baby boy dicks with the excuse of circumcision.. am I wrong or does "Naftali" also have something to say about that?
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
Clobro -
Ok BOT shut the fuck up with your copium of genocidal Israel.
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
Fartinggoose -
This tweet is retarded.
The media also doesn't cover if cheese is really made from asteroids instead of milk. The media ignoring something does not make it true any more than the media covering it do
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
free-will-of-choice -
The parasitic few suggested "moralism", and the ignorant many consented to want (morality) or not want it (immorality). The resulting conflict among the many (want vs not want) is called "reason" and
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
some_crypto_guy -
Tulsi Gabbard is a WEF plant.
The fact the moderators let shills like the OP shit this place up is why this place sucks. It’s basically thedonald.win. Brain dead MAGA hat wearing useful idiots and
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
free-will-of-choice -
>taught how to feel safe again
The issue with that is that safety for choice represents its origin of perceived balance...not the suggested choices of others. A TREAT (to subject to suggested infor
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
escalation -
Think you own your house?
Try not paying property tax.
Think you own your vehicle?
Try not paying car insurance.
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
free-will-of-choice -
>When something is right, it's right.
What if all perceived represents "what is right" and each one perceiving it within the lack of comprehension thereof?
>No matter what "side" says it.
Wha
3 years ago
PutinLovesCats
approved comment by
free-will-of-choice -
>Bold of you to assume
Can one define what's already perceivable or just make assumptions about it? Also; does the perceiving exist within or outside the perceivable?