Why do you people want bestiality to be legal anywhere?
It IS NOT legal in Canada: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/baf-bca/index.html
But it is legal in four American states, Hawaii, New Mexico, West Virginia, and Wyoming, which do not have laws that formally prohibit sexual abuse of animals.
So all of Trump's questionable business dealings, dubious business partners, outright business failures and character flaws did not disqualify him from office?
I admitted my choice, I had my reasons. So did you, why in the world would you resort to spewing vehemence and hate right off the bat? Is there nothing worth saving in the country to you? And to do it by the means set down in the Constitution?
Don't worry, I suspect I will be banned again soon. But I will still be a decent person, here on the forum and in real life. There was a time we didn't treat our fellow citizens this way.
Beastiality is NOT legal in Sweden.
https://www.thelocal.se/20140331/bestiality-now-illegal-in-sweden
Nor is it in Spain:
https://www.thelocal.es/20230221/fact-check-no-spain-has-not-legalised-bestiality
But it is legal in four American states, Hawaii, New Mexico, West Virginia, and Wyoming, which do not have laws that formally prohibit sexual abuse of animals.
At least push your antisemitic lies with a modicum of truth.
I did vote for him. I will admit that. I am not a fan, I had hoped that the country could turn away from the christo-fascist turn it was, and still is, taking.
Biden let me down. But I remain unconvinced that Trump would have been a better choice, and since we don't even really have a two-party system anymore, I made the best choice I thought I could during the election. I regret it.
Is that good enough for you, or would you like to accuse me of more things, even if you know nothing about me.
None of that is real, and you know it. You blame others for following MSM narratives, yet you swallow every lie and half-truth that OAN, Newsmax, and to a lesser extent, Fox News. Along with terrible websites like RawStory and Breitbart, and your own "research" which is produced only by people that share your viewpoint.
There have been changes in Sweden, but never to the extent that you think they have been.
They have been working on this vaccine (not really the best name for it) since the SARS Cov2 outbreak in 2002-2004, so 10 years of data existed. But you knew that right? You just disregarded it because you didn't understand how things work.
I did not disregard your argument, there was not an argument to disregard. You might want to look at the nation of Mauritius, or how the Indian population gets along in Britain without much trouble. I can only guess why the cultures you chose include Africa and the Middle East, but I am pretty sure you know why. That is why you cling to the "European" label.
People of all races emigrate to the Nordic countries, which are far more successful and productive societies than we have here. There are expectations for living there, just like meaningful immigration reform would do for our country.
You are expendable as well. I can adapt. I helped others while you did what you were told and spent the "pandemic" in your basement fomenting your hatred of the world around you.
I pity you and anyone who has to put up with your nonsense.
I did not include those sources as none of them were reliable and had their own agendas for reporting things the way they did.
You too will die, your children will perish, and your particular brand of malignant narcissism will be erased from the human genome.
You cannot cite diametrically opposed viewpoints as evidence of a whole. The human experience is varied throughout the world. Of course, the example you give is reprehensible, but that is not the norm either is it? This is an intellectually dishonest argument.
A certain amount of assimilation is necessary if people emigrate to America, It happened with your family, it happened in the last 60 years with mine. Hiding malignant racism behind the term "clash of cultures" is just one way to mask what the hate.
Why do you hate? That is the real question.
Resorting to name-calling and wishing for your fellow American to die, along with his children. Very nice...
And you do what you are told by the other people in this forum or anyone who agrees with you. I am sorry for the loss of simple decency in our country.
Not my opinion. Supported by actual facts. The things that you describe have been studied by The Mayo Clinic, MD Anderson in Houston, Johns Hopkins, and many other reputable institutions, pick one you like.
The virus, likely engineered to do what it did, but that is conjecture, did massive damage to the lungs and pericardium, resulting in increased incidents of myocarditis and damage to the alveoli. Because medicine did not have all the facts about what the virus was doing, they made mistakes, with some patients responding negatively to standard treatments.
Lasting effects, sometimes termed, stupidly, as "long-COVID" continue to plague those patients that had the original virus, before it mutated. The VAERS report system was flawed, there are other natural occurrences, like a football player getting hit in the chest and it stopping his heart, that have been lumped into the mix because of misinformation such as the "Died Suddenly" travesty of a film that did way more harm than good.
No. And you just want to stir the pot and be miserable. There is no grand plan to replace you. Everybody that disagrees with your viewpoint must be a "shill" right? That's the only way you don't have to reexamine what you think you know. Please get some help with your persecution complex.
If you read the actual law, like I linked, it does not mean that at all.