More bombshell testimony from Dr Immanuel: https://youtu.be/CJrJG9xymts
I think the real question is why they don't approve that sweet sweet alien DNA for covid treatment.
Ah yes, this doctor / preacher is a follower of the reptilian school of thought, and has stated that she uses alien DNA in her medical practice. At least that's my recollection.
Found the psychopath.
This works for thedonald because they simply censor (remove) any posts that don't fit the narrow scope (postive posts about Trump and associates, negative posts about Biden and associates). It's heavily moderated.
Will read, thanks.
I think it's clear this was a POORLY rigged election, given the sheer amount of conversation that is going on about the rigging. Perhaps Microsoft was able to stage some obvious fraud in order to convince governments to switch to Microsoft technology and thus allow them to rig elections without it being so damned obvious.
I'm not saying this is what happened, I have no evidence in front of me to say so, but I think you're being shortsighted.
There's a lot of evidence that points to fraud, but the claims of intent seem to rest almost entirely on the fact that Biden came out with more votes. I'm suggesting there are other potential motivations for fraud besides getting the most votes in an election.
Totally fair, have your own opinion. Just be aware of the tension between your desire for freedom of capital and your expectation that
People who produce the most value should have the most money because they're going to put it into the greatest use.
they do not censor anything that is actually fake
How could you possibly know this? They don't make their ban processes / statistics public, which is a big problem in its own right.
That's fair, I should've phrased this better to indicate a general attempt to provide more executive powers to the sitting president (by whomever), rather than making this about Trump or having it originate from him as an individual.
My interpretation was that Microsoft's motivation would be the power of controlling the election machines, not the money made from sales.
It makes sense because of what you said earlier:
People who produce the most value should have the most money because they're going to put it into the greatest use.
Inheritance completely sidesteps this merit-based distribution that you brought up, which I agree with.
That was a kind thing their family did for them and broke their backs to do at certain point in the past and now their punished for it?
No, they're not punished, they're dead. But in my opinion their children should not be rewarded for the efforts of their parents, or grandparents, or great-grandparents as the case may be.
Good thoughts, thanks!
TRUST THE PLAN is the new OBEY
I disagree, there are better and worse parts of the internet in regards to their tolerance for free expression, not everywhere is as bad as FB. Though things have certainly gotten much worse in the last decade as corporate ownership and control has grown.
While I don't necessarily support redistribution, certainly not in all forms, I think you make some assumptions when you say
People who produce the most value should have the most money because they're going to put it into the greatest use.
I certainly agree. But are the wealthy in America today inherently the ones producing the most value? And if so, is it for reasons besides that they simply happen to be wealthy?
I think there's a good argument to be made for flat income tax, for all the reasons you state.
On the other hand, I think there's also a good argument to be made for limiting inheritance, as the achievements of one's parents are no reflection on their children. Rich kids using money they didn't earn to make more money off investments doesn't really make them "people who produce the most value", in my opinion. Certainly the royal families of old would be considered "people who produce the most value" in that light.
That's the biggest red flag? Facebook is rampant with arbitrary censorship, proves nothing except that facebook sucks and you shouldn't use it.
Ever wonder if the "election fraud" is a false flag ordered by Trump?
It's a form of income redistribution. Power and wealth consolidate under capitalism, tax brackets are an attempt to mitigate this, antitrust laws too. Basically, America is a hybrid of ideas which often seem (and often are) inconsistent with one another.
This is not dueling electors though, dueling electors happens when the governor and state legislature both send separate electors. You wouldn't know this from reading thedonald though, cause they'll ban you for mentioning such things.
Yeah, thedonald is garbage, don't bother visiting if you have a functioning brain. They'd rather upvote some baseless crap that makes the whole community look like morons than question their dear leader or any of his acolytes.
They claim to love free speech, just not there :)
Thank you, 100% agree. I don't come here for memes, I want to broaden my mind.
faggots like you saying “oh no this forum isn’t focusing with laser precision on exactly what I think it should.”
Literally everyone on thedonald.win
"Demonic sex after demon dream sex [causes] gynecological problems. ... We call them all kinds of names – endometriosis, we call them molar pregnancies, we call them fibroids, we call them cysts, but most of them are evil deposits from the spirit husband. They are responsible for miscarriages, impotence – men that can’t get it up.”
I'm most intrigued by how she's been able to retain her medical license.