we don't argue for our debate partners, we argue for the third party spectators who might find themselves on the fence.
spectators will consume both sides and decide who is more reasonable/logically sound.
i've argued with plenty of stubborn room temperature iq people. absolutely couldn't care less what they think.
but it wouldn't be for him. it would be for the uninitiated third party reader who might be open but unsure about such conspiracies. refusal to even attempt to address the questions just makes it look like you don't really believe what you're saying. the uninitiated third party has an easy judgment to make after perusing these sorts of interactions.
if these really are super easy questions to answer, it would help your case if you just put a copy_paste.txt.jpg together.