by Oaty
3
sealedIndictments 3 points ago +3 / -0

Israel is a pawn to them too

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too bad. Patriots might be better up teaming up with the Russians to fight the globalists.

2
sealedIndictments 2 points ago +2 / -0

Poal.co has a really aggressive downvote algorithm that seems to keep certain types of shills at bay. But nothing is totally shill proof.

2
sealedIndictments 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, that was why I made it clear that it was pure speculation. What I might contemplate with their motives, goals, and power.

So entertain my spitballing. Humor me. This isn’t an assertion. Just a possibility being noted

Sure, every person they wanted could get vaccinated against it. Or it could have some sort of fast acting mechanism of action, where it is highly infectious on an initial release but it isn’t really transmissible from person to person.

Or, like I said, it could be something mild that they heavily exaggerate, like coronavirus or the flu.

Or they could just call it a superspreader without a single person getting sick.

And yes, I do think virtually every politician and other important scumbag is in on “it”, generally, as it were. Concerns might be raised over efficacy our outcome but ethics are not their wheelhouse.

2
sealedIndictments 2 points ago +2 / -0

This will definitely be the headline even if not a single person is sick. Same as they did for Sturgis, though nobody got sick and died from that.

-1
sealedIndictments -1 points ago +2 / -3

He’s not going to be indicted. He played his role well and will be nicely rewarded for it. He’s more useful as controlled opposition than a martyr.

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just want to see this place as protected as it can be from sock puppets and shills. And forum sliding.

I say keep the downvote functionality because it becomes obvious when brigading is occurring. Half the time you can find the best posts in other brigaded forums like ruqqus or reddit by sorting by controversial / disputed. Forum sliding via upvotes strikes me as harder to detect.

I have no problem with the CSS.

No porn.

If someone is obviously always spitting insults and detailing all discussion, if it thusly becomes clear they are a shill or insane, then ban them.

3
sealedIndictments 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for posting this. I'd been a strong supporter of Trump and looking past all this but would occasionally question. This gave me enough info to open my eyes.

Folks, Mossad has videos of Trump doing evil shit from Epstein. I know you dont want it to be true. I dont want it to be true. They have him by the balls.

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sandherin 54 and 55 are absolutely there

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

The best would be for cryptos

0
sealedIndictments 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump is controlled opposition run by Mossad. Believe me, it pains me to say that.

5
sealedIndictments 5 points ago +6 / -1

But he is a fellow white person, how could he say this?

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

Classic. I must've watched this ten times. Among other things, it contains the single best explanation for the Kennedy shot trajectory - the drainage hole.

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard to keep a tight rein on this many people. Plus with robots, they need our labor less.

2
sealedIndictments 2 points ago +3 / -1

Here's another source for you, OP.

The National Toxicology Program, a branch of the NIH, publishing findings in December of 2017 that linked cell phone radiation to brain and heart cancers in rats: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html

4
sealedIndictments 4 points ago +4 / -0

Essentially, this is saying that cellular behavior can be affected by EMF waves. This is something most 5G proponents claim is not possible. This paper certainly doesn't prove 5G causes any problems, but it is a reason that we should inquire further. Knowing that such radiation can interfere with biological function means that employing heavy EMF technologies universally requires thorough studies of safety. The onus is on the 5G proponents to prove safety, not opponents to prove harm.

6
sealedIndictments 6 points ago +6 / -0

I disagree. It's one thing to have a good faith disagreement. Nobody should be banned for not agreeing.

However, Shills don't just disagree. Shills spew obscenities in order to get people emotional and distracted. Shills pretend they have different views than what they truly hold in order to consensus crack. Shills are not arguing in good faith. They are not a boon to discourse; they inhibit it.

1
sealedIndictments 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's only a matter of time before large numbers of shills show up here. They've been increasing their volume on ruqqus, which was previously nicely shill-free. Once a community gets to a certain reach, it's going to get invaded. All you can do is make people aware of their tactics and outnumber them. Not sure if this .win has a policy about banning shills or not, but, imho, it wouldn't be a bad idea.