Gonna try to read this fucking pdf but man.. that's gonna take up so much of my time. Bits at a time where you gotta site there and try to read text. 500 pages too this shit.

So I'm there.. who is this bitch. Then I see this page..

The Significance of Ellen White's Head Injury

https://www.nonsda.org/egw/headinjury.shtml

I'm there.. what. Check the wiki and search the page for the word "head". They're not talking about this. Probably cause those religious guys are editing the damn wiki page. I don't know.

This could also explain how this bitch was having "visions". lol. ok so what the hell are they talking about in this page here. Maybe if you could fuck somebody up like that, they could see the dead or something, eh. lol.

What.. did this bitch fall and bash her head when she was growing up or what.. gonna check out that page. lol.

You

canaanites.. who are these guys?

Copilot

The Canaanites were the indigenous people of the ancient Levant, a region that includes modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, and parts of Syria12. They spoke a Semitic language related to Hebrew and were known for their significant role in the Late Bronze Age, particularly in trade with Egypt2.

Canaan was a crucial area where the interests of major ancient empires like Egypt, the Hittites, and the Assyrians converged1. The Canaanites are often mentioned in the Bible, where they are depicted as the inhabitants of the “Promised Land” before the arrival of the Israelites1.

Archaeological findings suggest that the Israelite culture largely overlapped with and derived from Canaanite culture1. The term “Canaanites” itself was used to describe various indigenous groups in the region, both settled and nomadic1.

Is there something specific about the Canaanites you’re curious about?

You

weren't they sinning or something?

Copilot

Yes, according to biblical accounts, the Canaanites were often depicted as engaging in various sinful practices. These included idolatry, child sacrifice, and other forms of moral corruption12. For example, in Genesis 15:16, it is mentioned that the “sin of the Amorites” (a term sometimes used interchangeably with Canaanites) had not yet reached its full measure1.

These actions were considered detestable by the Israelites and were part of the reason given for the divine command to conquer Canaan12. The Canaanites’ practices, such as child sacrifice and other forms of ritualistic worship, were seen as particularly abhorrent23.

Is there a specific aspect of their history or culture you’re interested in learning more about?

You

what was the deal with them doing child sacrifice? How do they even do that?

Copilot

Child sacrifice among the Canaanites was a ritualistic practice intended to appease their deities and gain favor for various purposes, such as ensuring a good harvest, success in war, or favorable weather12. This practice was also observed among their descendants, the Carthaginians and Phoenicians2.

The methods of child sacrifice varied, but one common method involved placing the child in a jar and then burying it alive3. Another method, depicted in some ancient sources, involved burning the child as an offering to the gods24. These rituals were often performed in sacred places, such as high places or temples dedicated to specific deities4.

The practice of child sacrifice was seen as an extreme form of devotion, where the more valuable the sacrifice, the greater the favor expected from the gods1. This practice was condemned by neighboring cultures, including the Israelites, who viewed it as a grave sin14.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about ancient cultures or their practices?

You

I thought there was some "moloch" guy

Copilot

Yes, Moloch (also spelled Molech or Molek) is often associated with the Canaanites and is mentioned in the Bible as a deity to whom child sacrifices were made12. The name “Moloch” is derived from the Hebrew word “melech” (meaning “king”) combined with the vowels of “boshet” (meaning “shame”)1.

Moloch is frequently depicted as a foreign god who was sometimes worshipped by the Israelites during periods of apostasy1. The practice of child sacrifice to Moloch was explicitly condemned in the Hebrew Bible, particularly in Leviticus 18:21, which forbids giving children to Moloch12.

The rituals often involved burning children as offerings, which was seen as a particularly abhorrent practice23. This deity is sometimes depicted as a bull-headed figure with outstretched hands over a fire, symbolizing the sacrificial process2.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about Moloch or other ancient deities?

You

was this molech guy like a statue or something?

Copilot

Yes, Moloch was often depicted as a large bronze statue with the head of a bull and outstretched arms12. The statue would be heated from beneath, and children were placed on its hands or in a furnace within the statue, where they were burned alive as sacrifices23. This gruesome practice was intended to appease the deity and gain favor.

The image of Moloch as a bull-headed figure with outstretched arms has become a powerful symbol of the extreme and brutal nature of these ancient rituals2.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about ancient deities or their practices?

You

so it wasn't him it was a statue of him.. like a BBQ pit or something?

Copilot

Exactly, it was a statue representing Moloch, not the deity himself. The statue functioned somewhat like a gruesome BBQ pit, where the children were placed on the heated arms or into a furnace within the statue. This was part of the ritual sacrifice meant to appease Moloch.

It’s a chilling aspect of ancient religious practices, highlighting the lengths to which people would go to seek favor from their gods.

Is there anything else you’re curious about regarding ancient rituals or deities?

You

any reports about them witnessing supernatural type stuff after they'd sacrifice their kids.. where'd they even get this idea of doing that. Must of been something that would go on after where they went, oh it "works".

Copilot

The idea of child sacrifice among the Canaanites likely stemmed from their religious beliefs and the desire to appease their gods for favorable outcomes, such as good harvests, victory in battles, or protection from disasters12. The practice was deeply rooted in their culture and was seen as a way to ensure divine favor.

While there are no specific ancient reports detailing supernatural events immediately following these sacrifices, the belief in the efficacy of such rituals was strong. The Canaanites, like many ancient cultures, believed that their gods directly influenced their lives and that sacrifices, especially of great value like children, would secure the gods’ favor12.

The practice of child sacrifice was not unique to the Canaanites. It was also observed among their descendants, the Carthaginians, and other Phoenician colonies23. The idea that such extreme acts could bring about desired outcomes likely reinforced the continuation of these rituals.

Is there anything else you’d like to explore about ancient cultures or their beliefs?

You

so this "deity" would never show up, or would he..

Copilot

In ancient Canaanite religion, deities like Moloch were represented by statues and idols, but there are no historical records or archaeological evidence suggesting that these deities physically manifested or “showed up” in a supernatural sense12. The rituals and sacrifices were believed to invoke the favor of the gods, but any perceived responses would have been interpreted through natural events, such as successful harvests or victories in battle12.

The belief in the power of these rituals was strong, and the outcomes were often seen as proof of the gods’ favor or displeasure1. This belief system was common in many ancient cultures, where the divine was thought to influence the natural world and human affairs.

Is there anything else you’d like to explore about ancient religions or their practices?

You

was this the area of sodom and gomorrah? that was those guys the canaanites?

Copilot

Yes, Sodom and Gomorrah were located in the region traditionally associated with the Canaanites12. These cities are mentioned in the Bible as part of the “cities of the plain” near the Dead Sea12. According to biblical accounts, they were destroyed by divine intervention due to their inhabitants’ wickedness23.

The Canaanites, as the broader group inhabiting the region, would have included the populations of these cities12. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is often cited as an example of divine retribution for sinfulness, which aligns with the biblical portrayal of the Canaanites’ practices23.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about this region or its history?

You

so they were just like a population, where.. around israel and they were morally corrupt?

Copilot

Yes, the Canaanites were a population living in the ancient Levant, which includes modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, and parts of Syria. They were known for their advanced cities and trade networks, but according to biblical accounts, they were also depicted as morally corrupt.

The Bible describes various sinful practices among the Canaanites, such as idolatry, child sacrifice, and other forms of moral corruption. These practices were seen as detestable by the Israelites and were part of the reason given for the divine command to conquer Canaan.

Despite these negative portrayals, it’s important to remember that much of what we know about the Canaanites comes from their conquerors, so the historical reality might be more complex.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about the Canaanites or their history?

You

what are all these other forms of moral corruption like what were they doing that was considered "sinning"?

Copilot

The Canaanites were depicted in biblical texts as engaging in various practices considered morally corrupt or sinful by the Israelites. These included:

Idolatry: Worshipping multiple gods and idols, which was strictly forbidden in Israelite religion1.

Child Sacrifice: Offering children as sacrifices to deities like Moloch12.

Sexual Immorality: Engaging in practices such as temple prostitution, adultery, incest, and bestiality13.

Murder and Violence: Acts of violence and murder were also prevalent1.

Ritualistic Practices: Participating in fertility cults and other ritualistic practices that involved sexual promiscuity and perversion3.

These actions were seen as detestable and were part of the reason given for the divine command to conquer and destroy the Canaanites13.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about ancient cultures or their practices?

You

there was no cops, or what?

Copilot

In ancient Canaan, there wasn’t a formal police force like we have today. Instead, law enforcement was typically handled by local leaders, elders, and tribal chiefs12. These figures were responsible for maintaining order and resolving disputes within their communities.

Justice was often administered through a combination of customary laws and local traditions1. In cases of serious crimes, such as murder or theft, the community would come together to decide on the appropriate punishment, which could range from fines to more severe penalties12.

The concept of a centralized police force didn’t really exist in most ancient societies. Instead, maintaining order was a communal effort, and justice was often swift and direct1.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about ancient societies or their systems of justice?

You

And these guys weren't muslim cause that hadn't happened yet? Cause aren't they muslim around that area?

Copilot

That’s correct. The Canaanites were not Muslims because Islam had not yet emerged during their time. The Canaanites practiced a polytheistic religion, worshipping a pantheon of gods including El, Baal, Asherah, and others12.

Islam was founded much later, in the 7th century CE, by the Prophet Muhammad in the Arabian Peninsula3. The Muslim conquest of the Levant occurred in the mid-7th century, bringing the region under Islamic rule and leading to the spread of Islam34.

Today, the Levant region, which includes modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan, has a significant Muslim population due to the historical spread of Islam34.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about the history or religions of this region?

You

so they're pretty much into "witchcraft" with this worshipping Baal?

Copilot

The worship of Baal by the Canaanites involved various rituals and practices, but it wasn’t exactly “witchcraft” as we might think of it today. Baal was a major deity in the Canaanite pantheon, associated with fertility, rain, and agriculture12. The rituals included offerings, prayers, and fertility rites performed by priests and followers34.

Baal worship often involved practices that the Israelites considered idolatrous and morally corrupt, such as ritual prostitution and possibly human sacrifices24. These practices were seen as attempts to ensure agricultural fertility and prosperity13.

While these rituals might seem strange or even sinister from a modern perspective, they were part of the Canaanites’ religious and cultural framework, aimed at securing the favor of their gods for survival and prosperity13.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about ancient religious practices or deities?

You

well there must of been something going on where after they'd do "rituals" there'd be supernatural things happening, like what goes on with real black magic witchcraft. But you don't see it nowadays cause you gotta sacrifice somebody first for the supernatural stuff to happen. They'll show you a bit of that in horror movies though. I betcha these guys over there in the Canaanites region, they had stuff go on, where they'd see things, so that's why they were doing these rituals.

Copilot

It’s certainly possible that the Canaanites, like many ancient cultures, believed their rituals had tangible supernatural effects. These beliefs were deeply rooted in their religious and cultural practices. They might have interpreted natural events, such as successful harvests, rain, or victories in battle, as signs that their rituals were effective and that their gods were pleased12.

In many ancient societies, supernatural explanations were used to make sense of the world around them. For example, the Egyptians used magic and rituals to maintain harmony and balance in the universe2. Similarly, the Canaanites likely believed that their rituals, including sacrifices, could influence the favor of their gods and bring about desired outcomes12.

While we don’t have specific records of supernatural events directly following these rituals, the belief in their efficacy was strong enough to perpetuate these practices over generations12. Modern horror movies often draw on these ancient beliefs and rituals to create a sense of fear and mystery, but the actual historical practices were part of a complex religious system aimed at ensuring survival and prosperity12.

Is there anything else you’d like to explore about ancient rituals or supernatural beliefs?

You

the ark.. how big was this thing and how many animals were in there

Copilot

Noah’s Ark, as described in the Bible, was quite massive! It was said to be 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high12. In modern measurements, that’s approximately 510 feet long, 85 feet wide, and 51 feet high12. To put that in perspective, it’s about one and a half football fields long and as tall as a four-story building1.

As for the number of animals, estimates vary. Some scholars suggest there were around 6,744 animals on the Ark34. This includes various “kinds” of land-dwelling and flying creatures, which is a broader classification than modern species34.

It’s fascinating to think about the logistics of such a massive undertaking, isn’t it? Do you have any other questions about the Ark or related topics?

You

was it just the noah guy who built it by himself or his family helped

Copilot

Noah didn’t build the Ark entirely by himself. According to the Bible, Noah’s three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—likely helped him with the construction12. Some scholars also suggest that Noah might have hired additional help for such a massive project3.

Building the Ark was a monumental task that took many years, and having his family’s support would have been crucial. It’s quite a story of perseverance and teamwork, isn’t it? Do you have any other questions about Noah or the Ark?

You

so 4 guys?

Copilot

Yes, according to the biblical account, it was primarily Noah and his three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—who were responsible for building the Ark. So, it was indeed a team of four. Given the size of the Ark, their task must have been incredibly challenging and time-consuming.

It’s quite impressive to think about, isn’t it? If you have any more questions or if there’s another topic you’re curious about, feel free to ask!

You

and then it was all just cutting down trees and somehow like what.. glue that together?

Copilot

Building the Ark was indeed a monumental task! According to the Bible, Noah and his sons used gopher wood (a term whose exact meaning is still debated) and covered it inside and out with pitch to make it waterproof12. Pitch is a sticky substance derived from plants or petroleum, which would have helped seal the wood and prevent leaks2.

The construction process likely involved cutting down trees, shaping the wood into planks, and then assembling these planks into the structure of the Ark. The use of pitch would have been crucial to ensure the Ark was watertight23.

It’s fascinating to think about the ancient engineering and craftsmanship that would have been required for such a project, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, just let me know!

You

how many feet long was this thing and it had like "levels" in it?

Copilot

Noah’s Ark was approximately 510 feet long1. It was also about 85 feet wide and 51 feet high1.

Yes, the Ark had multiple levels. According to the Bible, it had three levels or decks23. These levels would have helped organize the space for the animals, supplies, and Noah’s family.

It’s quite an impressive structure, isn’t it? If you have any more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

how many feet is a football field

Copilot

An American football field is 360 feet long and 160 feet wide1. This includes the 100-yard playing field and two 10-yard end zones on each side1.

It’s quite a large area, perfect for all the action-packed plays! If you have any more questions or want to chat about something else, feel free to ask!

You

oh so it's like only half as wide as a football field but like 2 football fields long?

Copilot

Exactly! The Ark was about half as wide as a football field but nearly one and a half times as long. To be precise, it was 510 feet long, which is about 1.4 times the length of a football field (360 feet), and 85 feet wide, which is just over half the width of a football field (160 feet).

It’s quite a massive structure when you think about it! If you have any more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

how many levels did it have in there?

Copilot

The Ark had three levels or decks. These levels would have helped organize the space for the animals, supplies, and Noah’s family, making it more manageable to care for all the creatures on board.

It’s quite fascinating to think about how they might have arranged everything, isn’t it? If you have any more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

did they put the animals in cages or what?

Copilot

Yes, the animals on Noah’s Ark were likely kept in enclosures or cages to manage them effectively. These enclosures would have helped keep the animals safe and organized, making it easier for Noah and his family to care for them12.

The Ark Encounter, a modern recreation of the Ark, suggests that the enclosures could have included features like slatted floors or multiple levels to help with cleaning and ventilation1. This setup would have been crucial for maintaining the health and well-being of the animals during their time on the Ark.

It’s interesting to think about the logistics of such a massive undertaking, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

so you're saying there was like 6744 animals in there.. but they had a girl and guy type of each? So like 3372 types of animal species? They just did animals not plants or bugs?

Copilot

Yes, the estimate of around 6,744 animals would imply about 3,372 pairs of animals, assuming each pair consisted of one male and one female12. This number is based on the idea of “kinds” rather than modern species classifications, which could encompass broader groups of animals.

As for plants and insects, the Bible doesn’t specifically mention Noah taking them on the Ark. Many plants could have survived the flood through seeds or floating vegetation3. Insects and other small creatures might not have been included on the Ark, as they could survive in various ways outside of it12.

It’s fascinating to think about how they managed all these details, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

so even elephants and giraffes?

Copilot

Yes, even large animals like elephants and giraffes would have been included on the Ark. However, it’s likely that Noah took younger, smaller animals rather than fully grown adults to save space and resources1. This would have made it more manageable to care for them during the journey.

It’s fascinating to think about how they might have organized everything, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

oh so they were younger types and not full grown

Copilot

Yes, that’s the idea! Taking younger, smaller animals would have been more practical. They would have required less space, food, and water, and it would have been easier to manage them during the journey. This approach would have helped ensure that there was enough room and resources for all the animals on the Ark.

It’s quite a clever solution, isn’t it? If you have any more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

So he went trekking around africa to get all these animals and had them parked in cages in his back yard for when he was done his boat?

Copilot

According to the biblical account, Noah didn’t have to travel around the world to gather the animals. Instead, it is said that God brought the animals to Noah12. This means Noah didn’t need to trek across continents like Africa to find them. The animals came to him, which would have made the task much more manageable12.

It’s quite an interesting aspect of the story, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

oh yeah they got herded or something, eh. So he had cages so like normally one type of animal would eat another, but for some reason they all got along and like what did they all eat that whole time. How long were they all on the boat?

Copilot

Yes, according to the biblical account, the animals were brought to Noah, so he didn’t have to gather them himself12. They were likely kept in enclosures or cages to prevent them from harming each other12.

As for their diet, Noah was instructed to bring every kind of food that is eaten and store it away as food for both his family and the animals3. This likely included a variety of plant-based foods, grains, and possibly dried meats for carnivorous animals34. Some theories suggest that God could have temporarily altered the animals’ diets or that they might have been in a state of hibernation to reduce their food needs4.

Noah, his family, and the animals were on the Ark for about one year5. This includes the time it took for the floodwaters to rise, cover the earth, and then recede enough for them to safely leave the Ark5.

It’s quite a story of survival and logistics, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

so the meat wouldn't go bad or whatever.. it was dried like beef jerky

Copilot

Yes, exactly! Dried meat, like beef jerky, would have been a practical solution for preserving meat over a long period. Drying meat removes moisture, which helps prevent spoilage and makes it easier to store and transport. This method would have been essential for ensuring that the carnivorous animals had a stable food supply during their time on the Ark.

It’s fascinating to think about the ancient methods of food preservation, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

what do these vegans think about how noah was feeding these animals meat and they weren't doing what vegans thinks is the "right" way to operate? Means noah's bad, according to them?

Copilot

The perspective on Noah feeding animals meat can vary among vegans, especially those who consider their beliefs in the context of religious stories. Some vegans might view the story of Noah’s Ark as a historical or allegorical account and focus more on the broader message rather than the specifics of animal diets.

From a vegan standpoint, the idea of feeding animals meat might not align with their principles of avoiding animal products. However, many vegans understand that the story of Noah’s Ark is a religious narrative from a different time and context. They might not necessarily judge Noah as “bad” but rather see it as a reflection of the practices and beliefs of that era12.

It’s also worth noting that some interpretations suggest that the animals on the Ark might have been fed plant-based diets or that their dietary needs were miraculously altered during the journey1. This could align more closely with vegan principles.

It’s an interesting topic that bridges faith, history, and modern ethical beliefs. If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

so did they get plants too that would be wiped out from if you'd put them under water, they'd die. So if it's water all over.. you'd lose all those plants?

Copilot

That’s a great question! According to some interpretations, many plants could have survived the flood in various ways. For example, seeds and plant debris might have floated on the water or been buried in the sediment, allowing them to sprout once the waters receded12. Additionally, some plants might have survived as cuttings or in the mud left behind by the retreating waters3.

The Bible doesn’t specifically mention Noah taking plants on the Ark, so it’s believed that the plants either survived through these natural means or were able to regrow after the flood12.

It’s fascinating to think about how resilient nature can be, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

and how long were they on the boat?

Copilot

Noah, his family, and the animals were on the Ark for about one year. Specifically, they were on the Ark for 370 days12. This includes the time it took for the floodwaters to rise, cover the earth, and then recede enough for them to safely leave the Ark12.

It’s quite a long time to be on a boat, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

a year.. that's quite a bit of food you'd need for that many animals. Anybody try to calculate like if you'd even have enough room on this football field sized boat for that long? How high was this thing.. you said like what 4 levels.. so how many storeys in today's sized buildings

Copilot

Yes, the logistics of feeding and housing all those animals for a year is quite a challenge! There have been feasibility studies on this topic. One notable study by John Woodmorappe in his book “Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study” suggests that the Ark could have housed around 16,000 animals, including provisions for food and water12. According to his calculations, this would have required about one-third of the Ark’s volume, leaving plenty of space for provisions and Noah’s family2.

The Ark was approximately 510 feet long, 85 feet wide, and 51 feet high3. It had three levels or decks34, which would be roughly equivalent to a modern four-story building3. Each deck would have been about 17 feet high, providing ample space for the animals and supplies.

It’s quite fascinating to think about the ancient engineering and planning that would have gone into such a project, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

how long did it take them to build that boat, these 4 guys?

Copilot

The exact time it took Noah and his sons to build the Ark isn’t specified in the Bible, but estimates based on biblical chronology suggest it took between 55 to 75 years12. Some interpretations even suggest it could have taken up to 100 years3.

Given the size and complexity of the Ark, this extended period would have allowed them to gather materials, construct the vessel, and prepare for the journey.

It’s quite an impressive feat of ancient engineering, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

You

and noah was like still around when it was done or he was obviously dead at that point if it was 100 years

Copilot

Noah was indeed still around when the Ark was completed. According to the Bible, Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came12. He started building the Ark when he was around 500 years old, so it took about 100 years to complete23.

It’s quite remarkable to think about someone working on such a massive project for so long, isn’t it? If you have more questions or want to explore another topic, feel free to ask!

[continued in comments.. lol]

Here's the video with the skip time to 11min where he gets into it. Note the upload date of Mar 14, 2024.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey0qVzG8_vU&t=657s

I think it had like 300k views the other day when it first got going. Now it's calming down the past couple days, up to 1.7m. I think it was at 1.6m yesterday.

I've never once heard of some "prophet" making a claim about a specific future event, that would then occur. So that means this whole thing of him getting shot, in involved with these guys and set up, ok. That's how bad it is. I was wondering the "why" about that the other day and it was like.. oh it's to fire up the religious people. Cause then they'd go, oh he's a "prophet". And then it almost makes Trump looks like the second coming of Jesus. He's also trying to get his second term. Jeez.

I talked a bit about this vid as I was going along, in another thread. I asked Bing AI what denomination is this organization and they're using this 1979 independent version that isn't affiliated with any old religions.

There's a big church place here in my city that uses the same thing and I knew about it. They don't have a good reputation here in town and it's basically a "cult", ok. So, same shit with these guys in the vid.

He starts the vid talking about this Flynn (2024) mainstream movie that's a documentary. No matter what's going on with this shit, check that out that movie it's ok. But this pastor was on tour with that outfit, so they're totally involved with these guys.

Then I think, the story Svali, the ex illuminati programmer had to say.. where they're lower level people too, not just the elite. They're born into it, they're Luciferian, ok. So these 3 pastors here.. totally.

This one guy who did the Trump prophecy.. he's a bit of a red flag with the other things he talks about. I ran the transcript text file through this text analyzer site to see what words come up the most. Some of his phrasing, like this use of the word, "fire". Let me get the instances he uses that.

He was talking about after Trump got shot and was down, "praying". He says.. "becomes really on fire for Jesus". He likes to use this phrase later too, where somebody is "on fire for Jesus". Let me get the other times he uses this really twisted saying. "it's time to get on fire for Jesus". The word "fire" was used 7 times in this vid. I'll tell ya where the fire is gonna be going on, it's these guys in Dante's inferno, ok and it'll be Yahweh who's doing that to them.

I notice they only use the term God, lots but they never really get into who that is. They go pretty hard at the Jesus thing later as if he's Yahweh. Usually these Satanists don't like to say the word Jesus and they didn't a whole hell of a lot earlier on. Let me check when they first use the word. It's like in horror movies, eh. They can be over-ridden by negative entities and they don't like saying that. It's used 18 times in the vid.

That chick though.. I don't know what her deal was but she rings my "witch" bell, ok and the deep stuff she talks about, she knows that shit, man. Just the part about the Salem stuff.

Oh, I was checking her instagram page and one of the posts was interesting.. The other day I did a thread wondering what the time he got shot had to do with stuff. These occult guys are really into those types of numbers, eh. Well, she mentions this in a post.

Ephesian 6:11.. time of shot.. 6:11!

The Whole Armor of God 11Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

So they're saying that's what's going on, eh. How he turned at the last second. Who knows. I don't know what happened. Like haven't had time to look. Saw a vid the other day, where the first shot, 2 people got hit and it also ricocheted off a railing. lol. Then you got that photo with the bullet line. If this thing was a 22 cal.. maybe it's so slow you could do that. So what went on there.. did somebody shoot and was that good, I don't know. Maybe there was some movie type prop stuff by his ear like a blow up pack. I don't know.

This fuckin video though.. these 3 people are ringin my scam bell a hell of a lot, ok. And it's a bogus "religion" to boot. But to be involved in this shit, they're devil worshippers.

Go see my other post where I got all the transcript in parts.. was only 3 parts. It's just such a fuckin load of hogwash. lol. And then this fucking guy who's the prophet they'll go, oh these other things he talks about are gonna for sure come true. This total doom and gloom shit. Like how many times did they say "earthquake". lol. Fuckin 12 times. lol. Then how oh the depression 'll be worse than the 1930's one. Like cut the bullshit here.

"The shooting at Donald Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, occurred on July 13, 2024, at around 6:11 p.m. local time. Trump had just started his speech when the incident took place."

I thought it might be the same time Jesus went down. You know them with the prophet. But this 13th and this 6:11's gotta mean something somewhere, I bet. Cause it was all planned.. the more it goes on and they dig, right. So there's no fuck up in the time. I don't really do these "numbers" thing. Let's see if somebody chimes in. lol

What I found interesting was.. wasn't this the last stop of the tour, before the convention. So it was like the last time they could pull this off. I don't know.. I don't do politics.

Was gonna try to watch that whole 44min vid..

3 PROPHETS Explain 3 American SOLAR ECLIPSES | APRIL8 SIGN | Amanda Grace, Brandon Biggs Cioccolanti

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey0qVzG8_vU&t=657s

Where at 11min it gets into this Brandon Biggs, there.

The other day started watching this and he's talking about this Flynn (2024) movie, documentary. I finished watching that earlier today. It was ok.. and I don't do politics. I suggest checking it out.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt30413525/

Was wondering who this Production company: "Aquidneck Island Productions", was. But now you're getting into other characters and let's try to stick to these guys from the pastor prophet vid. I started on that and it was some woah.

Hang on, let's do a bit of this "Aquidneck Island Productions". Checking where they're located, and why there. Not that big of a building.

You

who owns 501 Fifth Avenue, in NYC

Copilot

The current owner of 501 Fifth Avenue, also known as the Astor Trust Building, is Abramson Brothers Inc1. This historic building, constructed in 1917, is located at the corner of Fifth Avenue and 42nd Street, directly across from the New York Public Library2.

Is there anything specific you would like to know about this building or its history?

You

what tenants are in there.. it's not that high, eh

Copilot

501 Fifth Avenue, also known as the Astor Trust Building, is home to a variety of tenants. Some notable ones include:

Reliable Staffing Caserta Abramson Brothers Inc. BedRock Real Estate Partners LLC Efstratiadis Liana1 The building is 22 stories high, which is relatively modest compared to some of the towering skyscrapers in New York City2.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about this building or its tenants?

You

how come you didn't talk about "Aquidneck Island Productions" in there

Copilot

I apologize for that oversight! Aquidneck Island Productions is indeed one of the tenants at 501 Fifth Avenue. This production company, known for its work on various film projects, is currently involved in producing the documentary “FLYNN,” which tells the story of General Michael T. Flynn12.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about the building or its tenants?

You

why would they be in this building..

Copilot

Aquidneck Island Productions likely chose 501 Fifth Avenue for its strategic location and the prestige associated with being in the heart of Manhattan. This building offers a prime address near major landmarks like the New York Public Library and Bryant Park, which can be advantageous for networking and business opportunities12.

Additionally, the building’s amenities and the professional environment it provides make it an attractive option for companies in the creative and production industries.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about Aquidneck Island Productions or the building?

You

sounds like there's a place called Aquidneck Island why would they use this same name but it's not there

Copilot

Aquidneck Island is indeed a real place located in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. It’s the largest island in the bay and is home to the towns of Newport, Middletown, and Portsmouth1. The name “Aquidneck” is derived from the Narragansett name for the island, though its exact meaning is unclear1.

As for why Aquidneck Island Productions might use this name despite being based in New York City, it could be for several reasons. The name might hold personal significance to the founders, or they might want to evoke a sense of heritage or connection to Rhode Island. It’s also possible that the name was chosen for its unique and memorable qualities, which can be beneficial in the entertainment industry.

Would you like to know more about Aquidneck Island or the production company?

You

well who runs Aquidneck Island Productions

Copilot

Aquidneck Island Productions is led by Victor Mellor, who serves as the executive producer12. The company is also associated with notable figures like Scott Wiper, a producer and director known for his work on various films, and General Michael T. Flynn, who is involved in the production of the documentary "FLYNN"12.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about Aquidneck Island Productions or its projects?

But yeah.. let's stick with this pastor, prophet vid. Back to that. They're involved with this Flynn guy though.. he starts by saying he was on tour with him. So you gotta look into those guys too.

The documentary movie, Release date April 19, 2024. And this pastor prophet vid was from March 14.

You

discoverchurch.online seems to be with this discover ministries. Steve Cioccolanti. Who are this organization and what denomination?

Copilot

Discover Church Online is part of Discover Ministries, led by Pastor Steve Cioccolanti. Discover Ministries is an Australia-based Christian organization focused on equipping and inspiring people through the Word of God12. Pastor Steve Cioccolanti has been serving as the senior pastor of Discover Church in Melbourne, Australia, since 20002.

Discover Church Online is a non-denominational, autonomous group that collaborates with other churches for missions, evangelism, and support3. They offer a variety of online resources, including Christian mentoring, discipleship, and fellowship opportunities12.

Is there something specific you’d like to know more about regarding their teachings or activities?

You

so they're not like whatever branch of religion?

Copilot

That’s correct. Discover Ministries, led by Steve Cioccolanti, is non-denominational. This means they don’t align themselves with a specific branch or denomination within Christianity, such as Baptist, Methodist, or Catholic. Instead, they focus on a broader Christian message and collaborate with various churches and organizations for their missions and activities.

Is there anything specific about their teachings or practices you’re curious about?

You

how come they're saying bible scripture.. which version is that from?

Copilot

Discover Church Online, led by Steve Cioccolanti, primarily uses the New King James Version (NKJV) of the Bible for their teachings and scripture references1. This version is known for its balance between maintaining the traditional language of the King James Version and providing a more modern, readable text.

Is there a specific scripture or teaching you’re curious about?

You

When was this NKJV written?

Copilot

The New King James Version (NKJV) was developed to modernize the language of the original King James Version while maintaining its literary quality. The New Testament of the NKJV was published in 1979, the Psalms in 1980, and the complete Bible was released in 198212.

Is there a particular passage or aspect of the NKJV you’re interested in?

You

1979.. where have I heard of other "religions" using this version.. wasn't it like this springs church here in Winnipeg?

Copilot

Yes, you’re correctSprings Church in Winnipeg also uses the New King James Version (NKJV) of the Bible for their teachings and services12. This version is popular among many Christian organizations for its balance of traditional and modern language.

Are you interested in learning more about Springs Church or their activities?

You

ok so when you look at a chart of all the various religions.. and christianity, how it splits off into whatever sub groups.. you're trying to tell me that this discover ministries isn't a sub group of any of them.. yeah, like you said, for example.. Baptist, Methodist, or Catholic... but there's tons more of these sub groups of all christian religions. So these guys aren't a part of any of these, eh?

Copilot

That’s right! Discover Ministries, led by Steve Cioccolanti, identifies as non-denominational, meaning they don’t affiliate with any specific Christian denomination or subgroup. While many Christian organizations align with particular branches like Baptist, Methodist, or Catholic, non-denominational groups like Discover Ministries aim to focus on a broader Christian message without being tied to a specific tradition or set of doctrines.

This approach allows them to collaborate with a variety of churches and organizations, emphasizing unity and inclusivity within the Christian faith.

Is there anything else you’d like to know about their beliefs or practices?

Fuck, have you ever got a red flag with these guys, with any shenanigan organization that uses this bullshit, "New King James Version (NKJV) of the Bible", that was written in 1979. lol. Fuck, is that ever some "cult" shit, man. That place in town there.. wow. They don't have a good reputation in the city. It's like a "cult", man. So these guys are like that.

Then it starts by saying they're from Australia but you get this foreign guy.. Phillipino, to try and sucker them in.

I'm like 3 minutes into this shit and buncha red flags already setting off my "shenanigan" detector. lol.

How'd I wind up here.. still going at that UFO highway book. Up to page 124, he says,

"And the same goes for Mars. [101] Buzz Aldrin who was the Lunar Module pilot on Apollo 11, the first manned lunar landing in history, told the world live on C-SPAN that a monolith exists on the moon."

I ask bing AI.

"Copilot

Yes, that’s correct. The monolith Buzz Aldrin referred to is indeed associated with Mars, specifically its moon Phobos. There seems to be a bit of confusion because the term “moon” can refer to any natural satellite, not just Earth’s Moon. Aldrin’s comment about a monolith existing on a moon was in reference to Phobos, one of the two moons orbiting Mars.

The monolith on Phobos is a large, boulder-like geological feature that stands out due to its size and the shadow it casts, making it quite noticeable in images taken by space probes. It’s an interesting object for scientists because studying it could provide insights into the history and geology of Phobos and Mars.

Aldrin’s mention of the monolith was likely aimed at sparking curiosity and promoting the exploration of space, as these kinds of intriguing features can lead to more questions and discoveries about our solar system. The monolith on Phobos is a natural formation, and there’s no evidence to suggest it’s anything other than that. It’s a reminder of the many mysteries that await us in space exploration."

I don't know about that but I was asking it like nevermind that.. in those Kubrick movies.. what was the deal with the monolith and what did it do.

You can ask it about that. Then I'm there.. ok what's the real deal with these monoliths. I do a search on bibliotecapleyades that has so many sub pages of material. I see this page:

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_extraterrestrialtech16.htm

Apollo 10 gets glimpse of an extraterrestrial... monolith in space. Later a secret military space shuttle retrieves the space beacon. By Richard Boylan, Ph.D. 1998 from Boylan website.

Let's see if I can copy all this text in here. Oh it's not too much..

The following information was disclosed to me by a reliable confidential informant, who previously worked on contract for the National Security Agency, and maintains connections within the Intelligence community.

This informant, whom I shall call "Jesse", has over 40 years of notes from a very close relative, who served as CIA liaison to the National Security Council on UFO/ET matters.

This information has been confirmed by a second source, Dr. Michael Wolf of the National Security Council’s unacknowledged subcommittee, the MJ-12 Special Studies group. I have talked with Dr. Wolf about the notes’ author, Jesse’s relative. Dr. Wolf said that that CIA official "was like an uncle to me."

The reports which follow are thus not "leaks", but rather based on planned releases of information. These releases are part of a public Acclimation Program, an official though unacknowledged U.S. Government policy of "processed release of information", as Dr. Wolf described it.

According to "Jesse", in 1969 the Apollo 10 astronauts Stafford, Cernan and Young were the first to film an extraterrestrial space beacon, dubbed The Monolith, somewhat like, but smaller than, the one in Arthur C. Clarke’s book/movie "2001". They were not, however, the first astronauts to spot this ET beacon. The Monolith was first sighted by Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space, in 1961. He was followed into space that same year by American astronaut Alan Shephard, who also sighted the beacon. Apollo 10 went to it, and filmed it from every angle.

The Monolith acted like a communication beacon.

Jesse said,

"It sort of acts like the message received in the movie "Contact". It had a message on it, in addition to a map of the extraterrestrial civilization which placed it there, and how to get to them."

The Apollo 10 astronauts brought back the message captured on film.

The Monolith’s energy affected Apollo 10’s instrumentation, so that its crew almost didn’t get back. As soon as the film Apollo 10 took came back to Earth, those Intelligence compartments which deal with UFOs were busy poring over information from the Monolith.

The government then used an early secret military space shuttle to go get the Monolith itself. This covert military spacecraft flew years before the first "official" NASA Shuttle’s public flights in 1981. The space-plane is operated by a secret military astronaut program out of Vandenburg Air Force Base, California, among other locations.

The second flight mission of this unacknowledged military shuttle retrieved the Monolith, and brought it back to Earth in 1972 for study. [1]

After being retrieved, the Monolith was then transferred to a secret research facility. Scientific analysis of the Monolith was conducted at this domed underwater facility located north of Abaco, the northernmost of the Bahamas Islands. RCA Corporation is in charge of that experimentation research, Jesse says.

Jesse stated,

"They did it underwater, after they saw people dropping like flies. They figured that there would be better containment [of the Monolith’s suspected cosmic energy emanations] underwater." He noted that the space beacon "has a sound to it, like it talks. It also gives off a light show."

Dr. Michael Wolf shed additional light on the beacons.

"They are ’postcards from the rim’. They emit both light and tone signals, sending a mathematical language. There may be five or more ET civilizations involved in setting up these beacons."

Among the scientists who worked on it were famed astronomer Dr. Carl Sagan, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command General William Stubblebine, (ret.), National Security Council consultant Dr. Michael Wolf, and a former division head of CIA.

Everyone who had prolonged close physical contact with the Monolith got cancer, Jesse says.

"And those who tried to dissect it [the Monolith] died right there on the spot."

The CIA Counter-Intelligence official and Dr. Wolf got colon cancer. The CIA man required surgery, but Dr. Wolf’s cancer later went into a spontaneous remission. Dr. Sagan eventually died of his cancer.

Jesse feels that there are many more space beacons out in space, acting as "postcards".

"I’m sure Mother Russia had one." [2]

Jesse also revealed a 1973 formula for gravity control, used by the military to construct antigravity aerospace vehicles.[a] He disclosed that noted quantum physicist Jack Sarfatti was in a position to be familiar with this gravity formula used by the government.

Jesse observed,

"With regard to Sarfatti, as I can determine it [from the notes], he was on site doing work on the relationship between downed UFO’s and back-engineering, to the degree that he assisted in the gravity makeup formulae."

Jesse added that Sarfatti noticed that the captured UFO’s field propulsion guidance was focused on the ET pilot.

"[The UFO pilot console] had the hand placement with micro holes and light-emitting senses [sensors] to feel the impulse of the sudden hand movement; hence it [pilot and UFO] became as one. The driver always feels the outer skin’s ’road feel’, so it [the UFO] can handle better than a Corvette at 125 mph in fifth gear in the big curve."

Jesse added,

"Then again, Sarfatti has these [formula] numbers... he can attest to the numbers and even affirm that [antigravity field propulsion] is in use today! Matter of fact, the formulae even tell a story of the skin association between flyer and craft." [3]

They [ET pilots] think [a command]... and go. Sort of like... point-click and ship! Boom... you’re there."

"The RAND Corporation (a CIA think tank) holds the key to the [gravity-control] formulae." Jesse revealed. "Our Navy even set up the United Earth Space Naval Forces. I believe this group to be in existence today."

[a] U.S. Government’s old gravity-control formula:

phi(x) =<0lphi(x) l0 > + &phi(x), where <0lphi(x)l0> is the vacuum expectation value, and m2^<0lphi(x)l0>^2 represents the particle’s density of the ground state in the non-relativistic limit. The action of this field in the presence of gravity is... intrinsic gravitational cosmological constant Lambda/ 8piG receives a contribution (1/2) m2^<0lphi(x)l0>^2

(Continued in Article: "Extraterrestrial Base On Earth, Sanctioned By Officials Since 1954")

So this is kind of neat.. usually in these sci-fi movies.. it's based of real things they dealt with.

Lemme go get that thread.

Something doesn't add up with the cabal and "gold". How it's just not around. Countries can't go an "pull it out". I think they're using it for who knows what.. but researching about occult rituals and how they use gold for powers.

posted 5 months ago

How'd I wind up here.. well the other day I recall this color of money soundtrack tape I had back then. Noticed this Gil Evans guy was involved with Robbie Robertson. I'm there.. who's Gil Evans. Well he worked with Miles Davis.

Looking up the guy, see this dude with a long video about him. Check his other videos and he's got some conspiracy stuff. Then I see this one, "World of gold", 8 minutes. From when people used to watch TV. So.. that's them but whatever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsx7iIohMRs

Starts out with oh yeah.. 1933.. you know these guys and "33". Imagine them doing that these days where the government comes out says oh it's illegal for you to own gold, you just straight-up gotta give it all to us and we'll give you paper money that can be worthless later. Isn't that the same year they started the shenanigan federal reserve. Railroading that through while everyone's gone for christmas.

Then you get this Fort Knox, where it hasn't been audited since the 50's. In this vid they're talking about how German gold is held in the federal reserve in NY. And they tried to check it out and they were like, no for security we can't even show you.

Here in Canada, they mine lots, do coins for the government but they get rid of all their fucking gold.

Years ago I heard somewhere and was checking out a video where a clairvoyant was talking about 9/11 and it was like an occult ritual and the gold underneath magnified the vibe. Let me see if I can find that.

Nice.. found it in the old bookmarks.

"9/11 Occult Ritual: Blood, Gold and Emotion" 2min 37sec.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHvYGcs9hYs

Let me get that transcript.

"They are in large part responsible for many of the pyramids in Mizo and southern America. Because what they did is they had the natives gather gold for them. And the gold was initially used to send to Nibiru to save its atmosphere. But eventually the Anunnaki overlords here on the Earth recognized that gold had other properties to it. That if you combine gold with emotion with blood, you can alter reality. That is what was done with the Twin Towers. Dynamite was put in the tower so that they would collapse straight down, otherwise they would have fallen over, but they didn't. From an airplane. They would've fallen over but they didn't, they fell straight down. There was so much gold underneath the towers. Later it was told that the gold was there. They had a tunnel so they could remove it even if the building fell down. They would dig in from this part long before they could dig down. And so the gold was there. Needless to say there was horrific emotion. It was televised over and over and over around the world and people everywhere were able to, with emotion, relive and focus on this event. And the emotion of the people in the building and the bloodshed in the building, as these explosions took place and being burned alive etc. All of these things produced a whole other reality of control. It undid what we had worked on for many years to thin the illusions and it puts much illusion back in. They have used it from the sun. They've directed a triangulation to control realities on Earth. The blood sacrifice of the Aztecs, the... you know the gold from everywhere in the Americas and then in addition to that, if they needed a war they created a war. If the blood sacrifice died down, well they brought in the Conquistadores. They did what they needed to do. They had the emotion, they had the gold and they had the bloodshed. And they had this in three places on the Earth and were able that way to control realities."

I think these cabal guys are doing something with the gold somewhere.. I think they're gathering it all up together somewhere, too. Cause it's like nobody can get their hands on any of it.

So now this "gold has the least resistance to electricity", where does that fit in. How about the pyramid, supposedly like the top pyramidion was covered in gold.

But for these occult ritual reasons.. where would this fit in.

Paranormal stuff.. I think it can involve electricity. Like the other day watched this movie, Late nite with the Devil (2023), talk show during the 70's, where it's like she's possessed like, what was that movie with that chick in the room who's head spins. They have some stuff that is real.. like the vatican II updated their stuff about exorcisms. So what really goes on. But in that film on the talk show, you'd get these bursts of sparks, eh.

They don't use gold though. But what was Almine saying about 9/11 with the gold under there how it, lemme check that again.. I think it magnified the vibe, like what.. the collective consciousness. lol. ok I gotta go to work, you guys see where this fits in.

Wondered about this.. looked up, higher self vs the ego. I read this article. But after it's like.. ok how do you know, which is the thought coming from your ego or your higher self. Do you always gotta do the higher self decision in a situation. Lemme paste that article. I'll do my observations in the comments.

5 Differences between the Ego and the Higher Self

Linda Lange

I want to shine a light on the differences between the Ego and the Higher Self. And why it’s helpful for you to understand the differences. Why you should care.

Why do I need to know this?

The number one reason for you to know the difference between these 2 parts of you is to distinguish between them when it comes to taking actions, making decisions or reacting to the people or circumstances in your life.

Once you know the differences, you will be able to see more clearly if you are led by your Ego or by your Higher Self. And both parts play an important role in your life. But most of the time, we are led by our Ego these days. Actions taken and decisions made from the Ego are very different to those taken from the Higher Self.

If you by any chance read this article then you are now pretty well informed about the comfort zone. What it means to stay in the comfort zone and to step out of the comfort zone.

In the case of your comfort zone, the Ego wants you to stay in the comfort zone where it’s safe and predictable. Your Higher Self wants you to step out of your comfort zone, so you can have new experiences, learn from new challenges and go after your dreams and desires.

The Ego is concerned about your survival

Your best chance to survive is when everything around you and in your life can be predicted and is known. That means no changes, no new people, no adventures, no going after new goals.

But in these times, our survival is not very often in danger anymore. It’s not like it was thousands and thousands of years ago. But we still let the Ego guide all our decisions and the next steps we take in our lives. And the main reason for that is because we just don’t know any better. We have not learned this at school. Nobody ever explained to me (until recently) that I don’t have to listen to my Ego. That there is another part of me that I can decide to listen to instead.

The Higher Self is concerned about your growth and joy

My Higher Self wants me to go out there, to challenge myself and to expand my life and my world. I can’t tell you how grateful I am to have learned this and to know the difference now between my Ego and my Higher Self.

And if what I have shared with you until now, excites you or triggers you in any way, then this message, this knowledge is for you. You are ready to learn the difference between your Ego and your Higher Self and apply it to your life.

We are now going to discover my top 5 differences between the Ego and the Higher Self. There are obviously many more, but these are the ones I find the most impactful and insightful.

Difference 1 – How both of them view the world

The Ego sees life through a limited lens. And this limited way of looking at the world comes with the mindset of lack, scarcity and that there is not enough for everyone. It makes sense that the Ego would think like that, given that it wants you to survive.

To keep you alive, the Ego needs to analyse, assess and compare your external environment to find out if something is missing, if there is a danger or to decide if there is still “enough” to survive.

The Higher Self sees life through a limitless lens. It knows that you are always going to be alright and therefore it wants you to push your boundaries. There is nothing to be scared about outside of your comfort zone. Your Higher Self sees no limits in yourself or the resources in the world and therefore does not worry.

Difference 2 – One reacts and one responds

Your Ego mostly reacts to your external environment. It’s occupied with finding potential threats and scarcity around you, so it can only react when something happens. And that something is quite often a trigger. It usually looks for something wrong, so it can react to it and make sure that you are still going to survive. So you could say that it looks more on the negative side of life. When it finds something and gets triggered, it uses this situation to affirm its beliefs: That the world out there is a dangerous place and everyone is only out for themselves.

The Higher Self sees the bigger picture and the connectedness between everyone and everything. It therefore does not get triggered but rather reflects before responding. It knows that everything happens for a reason and is an opportunity to learn something.

It does not allow people and situations on the outside to unbalance the peace on the inside. And because it has this position of pure peace, it does not get triggered into feeling negative emotions. It rather takes in what just happened, reflects and then responds.

Difference 3 – How both of them communicate with you

Let’s assume the Ego and the Higher Self each have a voice inside of you. So what does each voice speak and sound like?

The Ego communicates usually in a loud, frantic, anxious and dramatic voice. It reacts quickly and wants you to act quickly. So it communicates in a rushed manner, one thought after the other, which can often contradict itself and not feel very aligned.

The Ego’s voice is heavy with emotions with a highly charged tone behind its message. Remember that it wants you to survive, so it will try to hold you back from doing anything new or unknown and will classify everyone and everything around you as a potential threat to hurt and harm you.

We learned already that the Ego does not like change, so in its communication, it will distract you from making changes. It will create stories about why it’s not the right time to change or create worst-case scenarios so you give up quickly.

The voice of your Higher Self usually sounds cool, calm and collected. It’s very consistent in its message and does not change its mind in an instant.

When you hear your Higher Self speak, it feels like deep and grounded knowing inside of you. The messages are straight-talking and direct, but emotionally neutral.

Your Higher Self gives you messages, guidance and insights for you to go out there and fulfil your purpose. It won’t hold you back and try to scare you into staying where you are.

The Higher Self loves change, new experiences and challenges and will always encourage you to expand and go beyond. It’s your biggest cheerleader and sometimes your stern guardian angel.

Difference 4 – Outer world versus the inner world

The Ego is focused on the outer world, your external environment. When something is not going as planned or wished, it tries to find the problem in your circumstances. That can be other people, like your partner, your children, or your boss. Or it tries to fault a country, a government, society, religion, or political situation for anything that is “wrong” in your life.

The Ego believes that matter is all there is and nothing else is important other than owning as much as possible to be safe, to be secure, to have status, to be seen as well put together.

It’s very attached to the physical 3D reality as it does not sense or perceive anything else. But that means it’s focused heavily on survival and fears death and losing everything.

The Higher Self is focused on the inner world. It understands that our outer world, the external environment is only a reflection of our inner world. So if something is not going as planned or wished, it turns within and reflects on what needs to internally change so the external change will follow.

The Higher Self or someone living closer connected to the Higher Self takes full responsibility for every part of their life. There is no blaming, complaining, judging or suffering due to others or external circumstances. It’s all up to the self to change the inner self, which means beliefs, perceptions, attitudes, thoughts, emotional addictions, and so on, to be able to change the life we are living in the 3D world. It’s more focused on energy and the spiritual world, lives by the universal laws and knows that everything physical is ultimately just energy brought into existence by our mind.

Difference 5 – How both of them behave in this world

This last difference that I am sharing with you, shows how the Ego and the Higher Self show up in your life. Knowing this means you can look out for it. You can catch yourself acting in one way and identify if this is from your Ego or your Higher Self.

The Ego’s typical behaviours are to overly care what other people think, to feel jealous when someone else gets what you want and to compete with others for money, status or love.

Behaviours like complaining, blaming, talking behind people’s backs and making excuses for yourself come from the Ego.

The Ego makes decisions based on fear, lack and scarcity. It can’t easily or at all let go of things that don’t serve you anymore, for example, a toxic relationship, an awful work environment and bad habits.

The Higher Self only makes decisions from within, from intuition and from the heart. It provides you with signs if something does not serve you anymore and gives you opportunities to let it go.

As the Higher Self knows about its divinity and oneness, it feels compassion and empathy for every person in the world. It can see the good in each person and each situation however dreadful it might be. It celebrates other people’s successes as it knows about the unlimitedness of money, love and energy. And it loves to give to others with no conditions or expectations to receive something back in return.

Apply this to your life and become a role model for others

I hope that showing you the main differences between your Ego and your Higher Self has been as eye-opening as it was for me when I started to learn this. I wish that this is something we teach at schools and universities. Every person in this world is aware and knowledgeable enough to distinguish if they are living, deciding and acting from their Ego or the Higher Self.

So help me with this message and carry this knowledge out into your world. Start by applying it to your life and take back your control and energy.