Print pic and pin to wall. It's comfy comforting: https://thedonald.win/p/11RhKDXQws/i-dont-know-who-needs-to-hear-th/
Apparently Pzczkxcrkrnwski made a career out of coups. You can't perceive yourself as a baddie for decades, so, out of habit, the word "coup" has a goodie ring to it for him. This is perhaps subtle evidence that he is not larping when talking about being into taking down governments. The word "autism" has a different ethos for a chansman than for a teacher, for example. News anchoress: "Phiber Optics continues to use the word 'hack' describing actions against the AT&T telephone company".
The sentence is "cultstate.com has issued protections on this matter". (Visible in thread pic related in first thread listed below.)
This is the thread which has tidied up the first results from larping and fucking around in previous thread(s): https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/301188989/#q301188989
"Insurance files located" does not mean that the key matched: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/301609522/#q301609522
The following thread has a list of links to several good previous threads. This is a fairly recent thread, but probably not the most recent. There is a collection with older threads with a lot to read, most of it crap, but also a lot of old pol-wisdom on Kappy-weirdness. For me, it was a gold-mine. Conversation became sort of larpy and repetitive at that point, so I called it a night.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/301228017/#q301228017
If you find a meaningful newer thread, please let me know. Thanks.
I don't know anything about leet encryption, not even what "hashcat" is or how exactly SHA512 works. Anons went as far as trying to brute-force shit with dictionaries and rented cloud-computers. (That was a hail mary; I was watching for interest, not expecting that it would work.)
As for Wood, I hope I got the following right. Wood tweeted a sentence he knew had to do with Kappy. Some anon ran the sentence through a hash-function which gave him the hexadecimal number that Kappy had posted in one of his last tweets before his suicide.
This is interesting, because no matter whether Wood is insane, a traitor, double-crosser, crack-addict, talking kitten, rogue ai, knew that the sentence was related to the hex-number or not, friend or foe of Kappy, into it for the money, comped or fucked, there is no way to get the sentence from the hexadecimal number with 64 digits, and it cannot be an accident, because that's the fucking point of cryptographic hashes (related to good checksums). Since Kappy's tweet is a matter of record and has been bounced a lot, this fact is non-negotiable and hard to ignore. Wood DID know a secret about Kappy nobody else knew, and it is very plausible that it is related to Kappys stash of compromat.
No matter whose psy-op that was, it might not have been us who was the audience. Wear the hat of those corrupt monsters in congress for a moment. They probably learned about Q fairly early. They learned that there was a high-level conspiracy going on that got their number. Q was mainly copying shit from 4chan, what was sort of meh for most people, but the framing in cryptic riddles was probably as effective for Adam Schiff and his advisors as it was for qtards. The horoscope effect works not only for gullible people, but perhaps even more so for people with a skeleton in the closet.Those years with Q must have been hell for many people in high places. Imagine how various security details, spies and investigators were chasing ghosts. Were there sleepers? Was double-crossing in progress? Who can you trust??? BEST PRANKSTER EVER.
Totally unrelated: cops in my country occasionally resort to a trick when they are desperate in high-profile cases like a mad bomber. While groping in the dark for leads, they give optimistic interviews, talking about "new witnesses", "better spectral analysis", "for the first time, we know...", etc., only alluding to shit for "not giving the criminal anything to work with", and they do that many times in order to make the perp nervous and drive him into making mistakes. It worked very well for a certain mad bomber who got stopped by cops because two thots in a car felt stalked by his car (didn't happen). Perp thought he was busted and tried to blow himself up right on the spot (sudoku-fail; lost both hands). Cops don't do that often in order to not dilute the effectiveness of the trick.
Both Q and cops had a lot of material for embellishing their allusions and make their water drop torture credible, i.e. nerve-wrecking.
Slice and dice cauliflower. Cook sliced and diced cauliflower. Melt butter in pan. Fry white bread crumbs [NOT QANON] in butter. Rinse cooked cauliflower in sieve, the drier the better. Eat cauliflower with fried bread crumbs [NOT QANON!], perhaps season with ground pepper. Polish peasants invented this.
The last quarter has been the worst. You need a magnifying glass for finding the signal in all the noise. Quality threads have become rare; lots of slide threads. The last week has seen significant thread turnover, but also larger audience. Psy-ops for shits and giggles have largely failed. Early spring was weird, with all the rona shit going on.
Eurofag here. This won't end well for frontline workers.
"Mister Ali, Mister Mustapha, please put down your knives. I'm sorry for your loss of a sister, but I have vaccinated in good faith and her death is unrelated. Besides that, here is this glossy info-paper from Pfizer AND your sister has signed that I've clarified residual risks. Aborted fetuses are totally halal and I'm a medical doctor."
Yeah, doc, that vax is totally safe for you and your family, because your owners said so.
You are all correct. Trump won't like me, but he was my first president. Not qtard; was blackpilled nihilist before 2016. Fucked up deception and clownworld have always been the human condition since agriculture, but the 21st century has been pushing it too far. Ted Kaczynski is on to something.
Okay, thanks, but I rarely do that, except youtube and other sites I know and that's virtually all there is. I'm a little shy about downloading zipped repos, though, although stuff like that can be put in a disposable vm. I never click on tor-links, but those are extremely rare. (I'm probably on all sorts of lists that might or might not come to bite me.)
I think in terms of hardware we are already there. Eggheads have been saying that since the early days of computing [1], but this time I am saying it. The brain has 100 billion neurons, a number that has kept increasing for decades, but now we've hit a brickwall, because more neurons don't fit into the cranium. (23 micrometer length/width/depth for a single neuron if I did not fuck that up).
If we assume that a neuron is a small microprocessor with perhaps 10000 transistors, we arrive at 1e4 * 1e11 transistors for a human brain, i.e. 1e15 (1000 trillions). This is a farily generous budget. Eggheads of yore assumed that a neuron was something like a single transistor. The 6502, seminal processor in the Nintendo NES, had ca. 6000 transistors. The Nvidia Ampere contains 59 billion transistors, approximately 100 billion, ca as many as the brain has neurons. This means I could build something like a brain from 10000 Nvidia Amperes, which would probably be a good engineering decision. 10000 graphics cards are expensive, of course, but the Oakridge Summit contains 27,648 Nvidia Tesla V100 GPUs, so that's NOT science fiction.
These are WORST case assumptions, because neurons are fairly slow, the NES 6502 ran a thousand times slower than a modern graphics card and harddisks are huge and can swap neurons in and out quickly, so you don't need 10000 of those but a fraction, perhaps a 1000 or even less would be enough. Another point is that most of the neurons in the brain are for backup. Demented people or people with serious brain-trauma can function with as little as 20%-30% of neurons. Children who got seriously brain-damaged early in their lives can become A-students and lead productive lives with a large part of their brain removed.
TL;DR: electronics for complete real-time (or faster) brain simulation is absolutely feasible for a mid-sized company or university research lab. (Paying for all the required wattage might be a different matter.)
The remaining challenge is connecting the neurons, but that might not be as difficult as one might think, because the process is largely self-guided and essentially what you do with with your files and folders. Stuff you need more often goes into folders that are more easily accessible and closer to home. Your browser gives you the URLs you need more often with fewer keystrokes by counting usage. Another aspect is datamining, i.e. detecting correlations by applying probability theory. You don't need to understand the correlations datamining gives you for exploiting them, and you don't need to understand why neurons are wired the way they are to arrive at a fully functioning mind.
TL;DR: Nobody can tell what a brain has learned by looking at how the neurons are wired, but google probably can't tell why you are served a particular cat-video next, either. You can leave learning to the simulated brain and go with the result without understanding the details, just as you do with your own.
Pure speculation at this point are consciousness, volition and motives in such an artificial intelligence. Consciousness might be an emergent phenomenon, but volition and motives are not. Those are instincts deliberately evolved for survival. You have to put those into a machine deliberately if you want them. On the other hand: If you build a machine to put profit above everything else and neglect adult supervision, you might end up with a catastrophe, but we have arrived at THAT point long ago with datamining in management and advertising and fairly dumb computers. Even more disturbing are the implications for superior AIs in war. Do you want to win or do you want to remain in full control of the AI and its decisions? Note that your enemy also has superior AIs...
[1] We had a psychology book in school stating that the capacity of the human brain was 2 Megabit [~1980]. I found that lmao because at the time we used the book, a toy computer had 0.5 Megabit RAM and more than 2 Megabit on floppy disks.
If this is not recognized by judges, rule of law is not a thing anymore in the US.