I thought it was a hoax? Is it crimes against humanity by the chicoms now? I must have missed that rewrite on the script. I'll try to keep up from now on. I promise. ????
what exactly are the chinese doing to you?
you're a psychopath
proven to be caught with its pants down on 9/11
Oh boy, you believe the official story of 9/11? Are you sure you're in the right forum?
If you keep your enemies guessing you keep them afraid to attack
That's like prison yard psycho talk. Act like a psycho who could attack at any minute and they'll leave you alone. More likely they'll attack you because you're acting like a psycho who could attack at any moment. How about making peace with your enemies?
It doesn't, because you were implying that she was not speaking inside the boundaries of the first amendment.
LMFAO, how the fuck is there treason at play?!?!? And you're wrong; rights are never off the table, no matter what Kavanaugh, the patriot act, you, or blumpf say.
Oh, I was under the impression that this was his site. My bad.
I would guess Señor Peyotl has that access.
I was wondering when shitposts would arrive on the shores of con dot win.
Except there is no crime on her part, so the only crime is theirs. Really makes you think. Much like the Podesta emails.
HAHAHAHAHA. 4chan screenshot "sources" are always the funniest. Thanks for the chuckle.
They're not "extracting evidence", they're creating evidence of their own crime.
the element of surprise is what keeps you safe
Spoken like a true psychopath.
TIL that twitter is the only method of communication in the year 2021. Press conferences, rallies, press releases, etc. are not "outlets to speak"?
And I was talking about his past threats against Iran and NK, not to mention his assassination of one of Iran's generals. As well as his constant barrage of drone strikes against Afghanistan.
Not for the next ten days...
Did you miss the word "initiating"?
The case associated with the "fire in a crowded theater" quote was overturned 50 years ago, and is considered one of the most unconstitutional, anti-free speech rulings in the history of the court.
trump is the one doing the threatening, sooo...
But we're counting on people who have been trained to always follow orders to not follow orders. That's why Nancy made the call.
Iran, North Korea (He has threatened them both multiple times), Twitter HQ(for obvious reasons)... who knows?
Nope. Trump can launch 800 nuclear missiles in the next 15 minutes with literally no one's approval. The only thing that could stop him is some saner head in the chain of command refusing to follow orders and risking court-martial.
What rule did she break AT ALL, let alone one that deserves death, and where does the constitution say trump has the right to execute ANYONE??? This isn't Game of Thrones, bruh.
That 1:10 ratio is a lie, and we don't know what trump did because he made it illegal to report casualties. We do know he did more drone strikes in his first two years in office than Obama did in his entire eight years. So the "pacifist president" has got that going for him, which is nice.
That's because it was all done with a wink and a nod, and no direct communication with donnie darko, to give him plausible deniability.
Do you not conspiracy?