0
cultureofcritique 0 points ago +2 / -2

Agreed, they're not acting like they're scared, in fact they're going overboard on censorship because they have the popular support to do it now. This all seems like hopium to me...

5
cultureofcritique 5 points ago +6 / -1

I want to believe what you're saying is true, but I really think at this point it's just hopium. I think we will see a lot of the things you said, but with Biden's inauguration instead of Trump's, and the investigations and arrests will be of Trump supporters. I think things are about to become very dark for anyone who's not on board with the new corrupt leadership.

Again, I want to think you're right. But it just seems so implausible that he could manage to stay in power at this point.

2
cultureofcritique 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. His video in response to the "terrorism" at the capital seemed like a deep fake to me-- his movements seemed very off. Since he can't speak out on any platforms, he can't tell us if they're faking his communications.

2
cultureofcritique 2 points ago +2 / -0

This tells you all you need to know about the narrative they're peddling right now about "right wing terrorism" and "violence". This was deliberately allowed to happen so that they could say "we're under attack from evil white supremacists", thus justifying the coming policies. I predict we will see further restrictions on free speech, red flag law gun confiscation targeting conservative "extremists", and other targeting of Trump supporters and anyone not on board with the globo-homo agenda.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate to agree with you given your earlier negative sentiment, but you're right. They're already resuming the session.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they swap him for someone with even worse dementia? This theory never made sense to me. He's controlled, for sure, but I think he's the same old Biden who said back in the '70s "don't assume I'm not corrupt".

7
cultureofcritique 7 points ago +7 / -0

Clearly our votes don't mean shit because they're diluted with voter fraud... so no, that type of democratic responsiveness doesn't exist anymore. Enjoy your corrupt president, and the next one, and the next one, and the next one...

2
cultureofcritique 2 points ago +2 / -0

RIP Seth Rich.

If the democratic process has failed, and all the Constitutional safeguards have failed, then we have only one option to regain our power against the occupying forces controlling our government. I never thought it would come to this. I never wanted it to come to this. But is there any other way to save ourselves from the globalists' agenda?

4
cultureofcritique 4 points ago +5 / -1

Possibilities I've heard that seem a bit more reasonable than a body double:

  1. He had a facelift, and part of the process involves re-attaching the skin around the ear after it's stretched and trimmed. This results in the weird earlobes.

  2. He's wearing artificial ears that contain earpieces for him to be fed lines or cues, or to receive other instructions.

A body double doesn't make much sense to me, because you'd think they'd pick someone who could actually talk correctly and not make Freudian slips/gaffes all the time, or say inappropriate or mixed-up colloquial phrases. Why would they replace the real Biden with someone who has dementia?

2
cultureofcritique 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck you for wanting to chop part of your kids genitals off just for a possible reduction in infection rates. Just wash their damn dick the way God made it and don't impose your wishes on another's bodily autonomy. Disgusting mentality!

4
cultureofcritique 4 points ago +4 / -0

For whoever it was saying the JIDF doesn't exist because the post just showed pictures of them and not an article, eat dirt. MILLIONS spent just because they're butthurt about internet criticism.

by TlKr
0
cultureofcritique 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, you JIDF really are pathetic.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, well thanks for admitting that's why you're here. Now Axo can take this admittance as a solid justification for kicking your ass back out again. Do we need to get up to 109 bans?

3
cultureofcritique 3 points ago +4 / -1

WTF does Lady Gaga or TMZ have to do with Big Mike? Their kids are actually the children of the Nesbitts. It's not hard to figure this out if you look into it at all.

by TlKr
11
cultureofcritique 11 points ago +12 / -1

They are here because they're paid shills as part of Israel's pathetic strategy to shape public discourse so they're not seen as the tyrannical conniving cunts they are.

0
cultureofcritique 0 points ago +6 / -6

WTF did you just type? Did that actually make sense in your head? Are you a bot that spews gibberish?

by TlKr
1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +2 / -1

To those who say we need to censor: NO. Censorship is what put us here.

To those who troll, saying we need "better arguments": NO. This isn't a place to argue. It's a place to share information so that people can decide for themselves. If your goal is to argue, then GTFO-- we don't want you here.

by TlKr
4
cultureofcritique 4 points ago +5 / -1

There's a difference between comments that seek to find out the truth in good faith and trolling. All the people I've seen mentioned here just troll constantly, rather than seeking out information and linking to it or doing anything to help the conversation.

You don't believe something? Great! Tell me why and what your evidence is, and I'll listen. That's constructive; trolling isn't.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine being so butthurt you'll go to an uncensored forum to bitch about the mod's censorship on another platform entirely. You know that Reddit requires mods to censor, right? Otherwise they'll ban entire subs. It's shit but that whole site has gone to shit now.

4
cultureofcritique 4 points ago +5 / -1

If you still believe "Michelle" Obama is a woman who could possibly get pregnant, you haven't looked deep enough into the history of Barry Soetero and Michael Robinson.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, he was blocked in pretty much everything he did. That's because the powers that be don't want anyone standing up for national interests against the globalist agenda. But just because they're so powerful they could block the president doesn't mean we should give up and shouldn't fight for what's in our interests.

We need a complete overhaul of the Republican party from the ground up, or a new party to take its place, and we need enough America First people in charge to where we can take on the system and bring it back in line with the will of the people.

1
cultureofcritique 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want out of the current two-party system of controlled opposition. So yes, I want him out, but not in the sense of being replaced by a Democrat. I want true American nationalist conservatives in power.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›