3
CrusaderPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately, all we really have regarding proof of the Blood Passover of St. Robert of Bury comes from this snippet of historian Jocelin of Brakelond, who referenced the now extinct book "Book of the Miracles of St. Robert":

https://x.com/Catholic_State/status/1904195701015261455/photo/1

4
CrusaderPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of the earliest accounts of a Blood Passover was recorded by historian Socrates Scholasticus in the Fourth Century, who reported the Blood Passover took place shortly after the violent Jewish uprising happened in Alexandria that caused St. Cyril to expel the Jews:

https://x.com/Catholic_State/status/1904180079975866857/photo/1

1
CrusaderPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is God - the God-Man. And His man nature was born in Bethlehem, Judea, to a Mother of the tribe of Judah, a foster father of the tribe of Judah, and He had a circumcision, preached in the Temple and synagogues, and was the King of the Jews. So I rebuke you back if you deny this. God bless!

2
CrusaderPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not a theory... I am speaking fact.

I don't have time to give you a more authoritative source but here is a Wikipedia article on how the Pharisees that escaped Jerusalem after its destruction in 70 AD created Rabbinical Judaism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbinic_Judaism#:~:text=Rabbinic%20Judaism%20has%20its%20roots,orally%2C%20explains%20the%20Written%20Torah.

Look at the footnotes for more authoritative sources.

Heck, do a Google search and you will find several Jewish websites that talk about the history of Judaism and they openly admit that Rabbinical Judaism was created by Pharisees....

This is not even a controversial point to make. It's just hard, easily provable fact.

4
CrusaderPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Didache, Clement of Rome, Epistle of Barnabas, The Shepherd of Hermas, Polycarp, Papias of Hierapolis, Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Cyprian, Aphrahat, and many others... All writings or writers that reference the New Testament and Jesus before the Council of Nicaea in 325.

Regarding non-Christian writers or writings that reference the historical Jesus, we have Josephus, Tacitus, Celsus, and the Mishnah, to name a few...

4
CrusaderPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, MANY other writers, Christian and non, were referencing the New Testament books before the Council of Nicaea in the 4th Century, so that's wrong, and non-Christians writers, like Josephus, even acknowledged that the historical Jesus existed... I would recommend you study history more. God bless!

3
CrusaderPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

True, but since I have been permabanned off YouTube (I've tried to make new accounts, and they somehow ban me, even though I have a VPN and everything) Rumble and Bitchute are probably the best video hosting sites I can use to reach more people.

1
CrusaderPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can play instruments and sing, and have been in several bands and choirs. The problem is that writing and producing songs takes A LONG TIME. I have played in multiple bands and have participated in the writing, practicing, rehearsing, recording, producing, and mastering parts of song creation, and it takes hours and hours and at least $100s per song for the whole process (and this is for poor bands with no label representation). That's why I have to disagree with you here. Writing songs via AI is much quicker and inexpensive and a breath of fresh air, if your purpose is to create propaganda, like mine it. I think of it this way: If I wanted to create great works of art, musically, then yes, the organic process is the way to go. But essentially what I am doing with the AI music is creating musical memes, not brilliant works of art, and since memes are supposed to be quickly, efficiently generated pieces of propaganda, I see the AI music as a VERY useful tool to create musical propaganda that can be used against the Judeo-Freemasonic establishment. Hopefully, this makes sense. God bless!

1
CrusaderPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

In Christian Tradition, the definition of "hate" is willing malevolence towards another, which, of course, is different than the modern definition of "hate", which basically means intense dislike. Yes, I intensely dislike the Jews for subverting Christian society and persecuting Christians, which is why I want to get the word out that they are doing this. No, I don't will malevolence on them. In fact, my will is that they convert and become Catholic, so that they can go to Heaven, which is a form of love the Greek Bible calls "agape", which means willing the best for another for their sake. For the sake of the souls of the Jews, I will them to convert in order to go to Heaven, which is the greatest form of love I can possibly have for them, even though, yes, I intensely dislike them. Is this clearer now?

2
CrusaderPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! I appreciate the kind words!

My personal conspiracy theory is that the "wailing wall" is just a part of a wall of a large bathroom the Romans built up after they destroyed Jerusalem.

Thus, every time the Jews do their "sexual thrusting prayer" (sorry, don't know what else to call that abomination that they do) they are simulating sex with a pagan Roman bathroom.

This is merely speculation on my part, but I think it fits!

2
CrusaderPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s heresy my friend. St. John in the Gospel According to St. John chapter 1 says Jesus is the Word, who was with God (the Father) and is God Himself. And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. Denying Jesus’s divinity is the heresy of both the Ebonites (an early “Jewish Christian” sect) and the Arians (which prompted the First Council of Nicaea to condemn their heresy). If you don’t know the divinity of Jesus Christ then you cannot know God the Father.

And yes, St. John's disciple, St. Ignatius DOES condemn your views in the next 2 sentences after the one I quoted:

"If any one confesses Christ Jesus the Lord, but denies the God of the law and of the prophets, saying that the Father of Christ is not the Maker of heaven and earth, he has not continued in the truth any more than his father the devil, and is a disciple of Simon Magus, not of the Holy Spirit. If any one says there is one God, and also confesses Christ Jesus, but thinks the Lord to be a mere man, and not the only- begotten God, and Wisdom, and the Word of God, and deems Him to consist merely of a soul and body, such an one is a serpent, that preaches deceit and error for the destruction of men. And such a man is poor in understanding, even as by name he is an Ebionite."

I would suggest repenting and educating yourself while there is still time!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›