It was at the Munich Security Conference this year that Zelensky casually announced his desire to have NATO controlled nuclear weapons installed in Ukraine. This was Putin's final redline and set off his "special military operation". Since the CIA has been gagging for Russia to act since 2015, it seems the whole thing was an intentional provocation with Zelensky's coked-up bravado as the catalyst.
Anyway, this conference is annual, but for some reason it's not really on my radar, like say Bilderburg meetings or other globalist hoohaas. RFK Junior characterizes it as a bizarre global meeting of spooks from all major national intelligence agencies where they discuss (ie. collude on) global happenings. Another important powerhub to keep any eye on. I feel a tad ignorant that it has escaped my attention 'till now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Security_Conference#2022_conference
It's funny and ironic that people, who likely have an obsession with eradicating hate, spend so much timing stewing in their own hatred by constantly visiting websites they hate and engaging with people online whom they despise. Is it some kind of hero complex? Or is it organized? We are surely not so busy a forum to warrant organized brigades. Or maybe it's just Axo's old fan-club visiting.
"Imagine this scenario of aggression. Russia has established something called SATA (Surround America Together Alliance) with the Bahamas, Cuba, Canada and all of Central America. Article 5 of SATA says if one goes to war, they all go to war. Putin is trying to get Mexico to join. He orchestrated a coup there in 2014 and installed a puppet dictator who helps enrich Putin through Putin’s crack-head son. He keeps assuring Mexico they will join SATA one day, even though the other countries would not approve the vote and they don’t meet some minimum requirements. Other politicians in the duma send their kids to be on boards of Mexican companies to collect paychecks of $50,000 per month. Russia keeps sending weapons to Mexico who has a neo-Nazi force of nationalists near the border who take shots at English speaking American separatists who would prefer to be part of the United States. Cease fires are broken 2000 times over 8 years, leaving 14,000 dead in the conflict. The U.S. has taken a patient stance, trying to reason with the Mexican coke-head dictator but he keeps accepting SATA weapons and money. Last week the Mexican dictator said he doesn’t just want SATA membership, he wants Russian nukes in his country aimed at the United States. That was the final straw. Tuesday the U.S. launched air strikes across Mexico and declared those English speaking American states as independent republics.”
I was interested in what Oliver Stone had to say about Putin’s military operation in the Ukraine. Stone posted this on Saturday 2/27 on his Facebook page:
Amid all the hysteria of Western media, screaming bloody murder at Putin, omitting key facts when inconvenient, it’s most important to understand the full spectrum of what’s happening — and, above all, to think clearly. With the help of the Internet, I’ve found some helpful and honest analyses. I cite them below in order of importance to me.
- Pearls and Irritations, a little-known progressive Australian platform, was sent to me by Zach Sklar, my cowriter on “JFK.” Tony Kevin was an Australian senior diplomat who was posted to their Embassy in Moscow. Here, he gets right to the crux of the matter.
- Also from Zach is “Understanding Putin’s Narrative…” by Jonathan Steele of the British Guardian.
- Joe Lauria, the heir to the late, great Bob Parry on Consortium News:
- And Caitlin Johnstone of Australia with “12 Thoughts on Ukraine.”
The mother and sister of Sasha Johnson who was shot in the head last summer have released a harrowing image of the equal rights activist in her hospital bed.
A trial [for her alleged killers] had been fixed for March 7 but at an Old Bailey hearing on Tuesday prosecutor Mark Heywood QC said the Crown would not be pursuing the case, for reasons that could not be set out fully in open court.
The decision followed a rare notification hearing, held behind closed doors, which can be used in cases that involve evidence from informants or listening devices.
