▲ 3 ▼
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

You do seem to have a learning difficulty though. I'm not a flat earther, yet you continue to label me as one. And there is a lot of evidence that contradicts the pseudo science of virology, as it stands - but you don't seem to be able to take that in. Have you ever been tested?

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Incidentally, I've been unable to find a copy of the documentary, with subtitles or without, but found the book instead. If anyone with top internet searching skills is interested and can find it, please share. I got absolutely nowhere using many search phrase combinations of the authors name, RT Arabic, and "moon" or "apollo" etc. The frustrating thing is, I saw that it was online before, maybe a year and half or so ago, but didn't watch it.

▲ 8 ▼
clemaneuverers 8 points ago +8 / -0

In my defense, I would have put "porn addicted retard cucks" in inverted commas, like that, since it was directly quoted from the user who I was replying to. However, I've kinda given up on trying to edit comments after the fact on this site since they don't seem to stick.

▲ 9 ▼
clemaneuverers 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thanks! Glad to be here. Fuck Reddit!

▲ 19 ▼
clemaneuverers 19 points ago +19 / -0

It's a dumb analogy. The droplets that allegedly contain the virus (not proven), which emerge from your face holes, are miniscule and basically evaporate almost instantly.

▲ 5 ▼
clemaneuverers 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Russians were the first to send a rover to the moon. They used it to place the famous "laser reflector" there, which is often touted as evidence of humans having been there.

Having said that, there is doubt as whether the reflectors have ever even actually been used. I'm refering to a non-hoaxer study that was done in the interest of checking if the reflectors were still functional or not, or if reflected lasers were just bouncing off the bare surface. The study proved that the only time that the "signal strength" of the reflected laser matched what was expected from bouncing off the reflector on the moon, and not just the surface itself, was the first time the Russians did it using their reflector, which was in the mid 60's. All other recorded times, the signal is equivalent to having just bounced off the surface itself.

The study concluded that the reflectors are likely busted or covered by regolith; but an equally valid interpretation is that they've never been used at all, except maybe that first time by the Russians. So how do we know they are there at all, except for that first soviet use of them. And can that first result be trusted?

So to answer your question, I don't know :D

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you scan the QR code in the picture?

I tried and you can - it just gives a two word message:

'Twas brillig

Which appears to be German

etwas brillig

something brilliant

just the digital artist filling in a blank it seems.

by Alduin
▲ 17 ▼
clemaneuverers 17 points ago +17 / -0

The Jews provide the porn though, with the explicit intent of making people porn addicted retard cucks. There's the incident in Palestine, where Israel took over a territory and one of their first actions was to begin broadcasting pornography on the Palestinian television channel, as a method of control and to subdue the angry Palestinians, to distract them from the fact that Israel had just taken over. Michael E. Jones has written about it.

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not a flat earther, but I thought this particular documentary was decent. I can see your mind is made up, despite your profound ignorance. Fine by me.

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

You watched ten minutes of a 2 and half hour documentary. Anyway, you don't even have to watch this documentary, if it offends you so much, since there are plenty of sources on this topic which are "unsullied" by a connection to flat earthers. It seems that you've not looked into the topic at all though, so the documentary is very convenient for someone on your level. If you like, l can look up some reading material for you (in due course); or the original source videos used in the documentary, so you can watch them without being triggered by flat earther narration.

▲ 4 ▼
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn't even know they were flat earthers till you pointed it out. It changes nothing, you're using it as an excuse to excuse yourself from looking into this topic ith an open mind.

▲ 6 ▼
clemaneuverers 6 points ago +6 / -0

So what if they're flat-earthers, they made an excellent overview documentary on the argument for Terrain theory over Germ theory; they didn't discover or develop that theory. They are merely summarising the work of many "non-flat earthers".

Terrain theory goes back to Bechamp, (actually it goes back further, but he's the best known proponent) who was a contemporary and rival of Louis Pasteur, the Germ Theory god. In 1995, Pasteur's private diaries were published for the first time, and they showed what some suspected for a while already; that he was a huckster and a fraud who faked the positive results of his innoculation research to advance his career and profit from his vaccine concoctions. Bechamp's rival theory is and always has been closer to objective truth.

BTW Pasteur's ideas about vaccination were not inspired not by observation; he was inspired by the Rabbis in the Talmud, wherein they argued they could cure rabies in a human by killing the rabid dog that bit the person, removing it's liver, and forcing the sick person to eat some of it.

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alexander de Seversky (1894-1974), in youth an ace pilot for Russia's Tsarist Navy, emigrated to the US and became involved in military aviation there. He visited Hiroshima and Nagasaki shortly after the 'nuke blasts', talking to witnesses, and in a Reader's Digest article in February 1946 - let on between the lines that the 'nuclear weapons' were fake. He avoided saying so directly, but pointed out that, "To my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan." Directly under ground zero, Seversky saw "buildings structurally intact, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, railings, signs, and other comparatively fragile objects ... I could find no traces of unusual phenomena ... It simply is not true that matter was vapourised ... tree trunks and walls with growing vines disprove the claims of superheat ... it was fire, just fire, that took such high toll of life."

https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html

▲ 4 ▼
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +4 / -0

5 HOURS! Can we get some sort of TL;DW? Highlights?

▲ 7 ▼
clemaneuverers 7 points ago +7 / -0

Germ Theory is bullshit

This does not rule out the exitstence of germs, and the documentary never says they are not real. It's about how the theory of their origin, function, and the affects attributed to them are all essentially bullshit assumptions and up for debate.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›