The title of this post prompted me to write this - it's a theory I've had for some time, but haven't written about it since the days of Voat.

Let me start with a basic example to set the ground work:

1. you're in vacation in Italy, from NYC
2. an Italian man sees you have an NYC belt buckle and decides to mess with you
3. knowing NYC people flip each other off, he flips you off, just to get you to flip home off back
4. you respond by flipping him off

The Italian man has remote controlled you, by exploiting some basic knowledge about you.

Taking it to the Next Level

Secondly, let me use a more complex example to lay the framework for understanding this risk:

You receive the following email:

Hey <name>, you don't know me, but I got your email from <somebody you knew when you worked at <prior job>. I'm writing this to let you know that <your wife's name> has been cheating on you. A friend of mine recognized her during a gang bang and told me... [continues, goes into more detail, knows about a private tattoo on her body and even mentions some kinky things she's into, etc.] (things gleaned from audio spying via your mobile phone, social media, etc.)

If you're married, then even reading this hypothetical email probably triggered some parasympathetic reactions in your body; imagine how you'd feel, if you received a message like this...

The aforementioned example is extraordinarily simplistic, compared to what I'll get into, because A) the secret details are actually pretty basic, B) the result is most likely not deadly, and C) ... the really important bit ...

C) ... the M.O. of such an attack works from a basic premise, namely that the victim will likely react emotionally to the purported news that his wife is cheating on him in a really nasty way. But, people get over such things, dump their wife, talk through it and realize it was an elaborate scam, esp when they hear on the news that others have received such messages, etc.

Where Things Get Truly Scary

I posit that there exists sequences of words and social cues, for each person, which will cause that person to take each specific action within their capability, including committing violence and/or suicide.

Think of the secrets that make up your ego, the littlest things that you feel, have shame about, your nervous ticks, things you're afraid of, things you regret deeply, people you miss, moments in your life that you hate, your secret mortal enemies, envies you hold, etc., down to the deepest and most intricate detail.

Imagine something, with hyper intelligence, using that kind of knowledge, gleaned via what would essentially amount to a tempest attack on the human mind (e.g., sending minute signal modulations from your phone's antenna to a super computer with all fMRI and other telemetry data in existence) that, combined with the full corpus of available digital data available about you, to construct a sequence of words and social cues, whether all at once, or over a long period of time, through conversation. Now, imagine that happening to everyone in the US, all at once.

I believe this kind of attack will happen, at some point, and it'll likely work from the inside out, first using secret information to drive couples apart, and then to drive society into a state of unthinkable chaos.

A bunch of us commented about this gab post from last night:

https://gab.com/Spacecowboy777/posts/110102454199535284

I posted this 1080 P version of the videos:

https://youtu.be/gK_DbxAciho

This morning I spent some more time looking at the footage and the shoes and trying to make sense of it.

Here are the shoes from the video:

• https://files.catbox.moe/w3vyq3.jpeg
• https://files.catbox.moe/tvg0rv.jpeg
• https://files.catbox.moe/g2lz4f.jpeg

The first is taken from the first hallway scene where she walks around in circles for a minute before walking through the door on the top left. The second is taken from the next scene after she walks through the door (the scene with the terra-cotta colored tile). The third is, of course, from the shooting scene. I've taken the images and rotated them to orient the shoes, facing right, for comparison purposes.

This is the shoe model that the gab post suggested is in the shooting scene:

https://files.catbox.moe/kgzqv4.jpeg

And this is the shoe model that the gab post suggested is in the overhead footage:

https://files.catbox.moe/pe483u.jpeg

After looking closely at the screenshots from the footage, and comparing them to the shoe models, it's obvious that the shooting scene shoes match the flame shoes from the gab post, but I no longer think there's any chance that the shoe in the screenshots is the other (Puma) shoe from the gab post. The puma shoes have a rounded white pattern that goes down to the sole, while the screenshots show the same flat front from the flame shoe model.

However, this post is not intended to debunk the theory, because there is something even more fucky about the footage. I don't think the shoe is the puma shoe, but I also think that somebody did modify the footage, and that's where the discrepancy probably came from. In other words, I think the shoes may be different, but they're not the pumas from the gab post, they are something else, entirely, and somebody added to the footage to make them look like the flame shoes.

Take a look at this image, which is just a copy of the first image, with the anomaly that I've seen in multiple frames outlined. Go back to the original of this, the first link above, and look at the perfect rectangle and the drop shadow that appears below that. Maybe I am over thinking this and this is just some kind of video anomaly, but when you consider this evidence with the fact that the outer rubber soles on the shoes have all kinds of shape to them (they are like bumpy), compared to the ones with the flames which are perfectly smooth, it's hard to ignore this.

https://files.catbox.moe/mqzp9z.jpeg

Was this just an alt for somebody else? He was posting some pretty decent stuff; I didn't see anything that seemed like MSM shill nonsense, etc. I logged in to go back to a post that he made and it says the user deleted their account. Does anybody know what happened? Was there some kind of confrontation I missed?

Please pardon any weird typos; I'm writing this with voice to text.

I think this inflation/hiking whipsaw cycle has been specifically about CBDC, but not in the obvious "collapse the USD to usher in CBDC" sense; something more complex and interesting.

Here's what I think the plan looks like:

1. Create high inflation in many currencies
2. Whipsaw into a tightening cycle (last year)
3. Keep going until there is a dollar shortage (now)
4. Prop the US economy up with cheap oil, via the SPR (now)
5. Let the dollar shortage gets so bad that a large scale USD, et al, counterfeit operation begins to manifest, globally (think trillions)
6. Determine that the only solution to this scale of counterfeiting is to turn in all of the paper money and scan the serial numbers on the way in, paying people out, even if they have a certain amount of counterfeit money, as long as they can show that they acquired this money legally
7. Determine that the only way to achieve step six is via a new token system that will resemble CBDC which circumvents IBS
8. Those who did not buy gold before this event will be permanently enslaved, and even those who did buy gold (or silver) will be hard pressed to live outside of this system
9. I can imagine a scenario where all of this happens at the same time as 15 minutes cities, bird flu, and World War III, so get ready to be living in a world that makes Blade Runner look like The Swiss Family Robinson

Try not to eat between breakfast and the following day's breakfast. You'll be shocked at how difficult this is. Our ancestors went for days without eating; there were not refrigerators, or even agriculture, for most of humanity's existence, so we either had fresh food and ate, or we starved.

Because of this eating/starving cycle, a symbiosis formed, between us and the bacteria that live in us. Think of these bacteria as an extremely blue collar workforce; it's hard work, but you get the job done and then you die. When times are good the populations grow up, but they always stay in balance.

Fast forward to today, and most of us have abundant food available anytime of the day, and for many of us, this food contains such cheaply available calories (glucose, fructose, etc.) that we have created a welfare state for bacteria. Just like with a human welfare state, it's no longer the bacteria that serve the most important purpose that thrive, it's the bacteria that reproduce at the fastest rate, given the available energy medium. As a result, our immune systems are partially tasked with destroying bacteria that have no business existing in our bodies in such high numbers. This wreaks havoc on our health more than any other thing we do.

There are various schools of thought when it comes to fasting, but, as a general principle, fasting, to some degree, on a regular basis, creates a biome inside of you that more closely represents how we naturally existed before the advent of french fries and corn bread.

None of this is medical advice and I am not a medical professional.

There is a kind of counter intelligence tactic that I'm trying to figure out the term for.

Imagine you knew your boss was watching you, but your boss didn't know you were aware of him watching you. So you start acting a certain way to project the image of yourself, as an employee, that you want your boss to see.

What is this called in counter intelligence? I know there's a term, but I cannot remember the name; using secret knowledge of somebody spying on you to further your goals without them realizing.

Imagine, truly and deeply, that you were the only user on here, and that this forum was a Slowloris style attack on you, tailored for you, by AI, to keep you coming back, the AI watching you all day, and unavoidable (e.g., with VPN, ad blockers, etc.). No other humans around; just you and a simulated experience.

I just described the future of the Internet.

As ridiculous as FE seems, prima facie, until it's proven false, I keep my mind open to plausible explanations for why:

A) the moon landings were all fake and we've never "been back"

B) there are no actual photos of the entire earth from space (unless you believe the sizes of the continents are changing by 30-60% every decade or so)

C) the only people on earth that we give billions of dollars to, to go to space, are faking any, let alone much (or all) of the footage, using green screens, parabolic "zero gravity" flights, actual hair spray to make their hair stand up, underwater studios (unless you believe in air bubbles in space)

You might say "but these items have better explanations than FE". Well let's hear those theories also. Let's not shoot down those who are proposing an outlandish, yet mostly comprehensive, theory, one that explains these anomalies as well as a plethora of others, like how did they use radio frequencies that don't even purportedly bounce off the ionosphere to communicate hundreds of miles during WWII, how can the horizon be seen above an item whose entirety should be hidden behind it, why is Antarctica, aside from a tiny portion, entirely off limits to most civilians, how was Felix Baumgartner able to slowly float up to nearly 30 miles without drifting a thousand or more miles because of the earth's rotation, etc.

Suggestions that these things are not even worthy of discussion, on a forum dedicated to conspiracy theories, have to be disingenuous.

Original Research

Let's not also forget that FE researchers are literally the only conspiracy theorists doing original research. These people will buy lasers that cost thousands of dollars, cameras, etc., and go to some large body of water (large lakes, bays, etc.) where they can test their hypothesis with an actual experiment. Everything else I see on here is pure speculation, or videos of interviews involving various professionals with dubious backstories (Malone, etc.).

Does it Matter

Pertaining the "would it even matter" argument, you honestly don't need a lukewarm IQ to imagine how much it would matter, if FE was real.

Principles

Most of us are here because we couldn't speak freely elsewhere, because "hate has no place on our platform" type communist bullshit. Now we're going to make the same kind of rules, especially banning arbitrary content that is desired by a clear majority, on a platform with already-existing mechanisms for getting rid of low quality postd (downvoting, hiding)? If FE posts are banned, this place is no better than TGA, and don't even pretend to be pro constitution when you can't even stand up for free speech about a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory forum.

I'm out of here, for good, if FE is banned. Aside from spam, illegal, doxxing, banning has no place on our platform.

I had this shower thought last night. If you had enough satellites in the sky, you could broadcast certain bands of radio signal from the ground and use the shadows and distortions between the broadcast and the receiving satellites as a form of radar to watch for stealthy objects; it would allow for brief moments of detection, along with approximate vector calculation. If those satellites were also equipped with moderately high resolution cameras, the combination would allow detection and tracking of objects at any altitude.

Russia defeated the F-117 Nighthawk with X band radar, and I think a lot of aeronautical geeks have since dismissed "stealth" as useless. It's definitely not useless. The Nighthawk relied, in large part, on its tiny radar cross-section, and the technology was very rudimentary at the time. Despite how wasteful the military-industrial complex is, especially during peacetime, the amount of money put into stealth technology in the ensuing decades, is not simply a matter of waste. The Air Force would not spend twice as much time and money for every flight hour, for modern jets, like the F-35, if the stealth was entirely ineffective.

A lot of folks see these satellites as the Internet for the CBDC or digital ID, and I don't deny that they could also be used for those things. But I think that the bigger use case is as military technology, for battlefield communications and observation.

Just ask yourself, if I can think of this, what are the odds that DARPA and the military industrial complex didn't think of this. I've come up with some reasonably interesting military invention ideas over the years, but I'm certainly no competition to DARPA as a whole.

This isn't really a "conspiracy theory", since the military has always been engaged in designing and developing and deploying secret technology, and, if anything, it's a little bit of a white pill that the US could have a new leg up on the rest of the world when it comes to tracking missiles and stealth jets (versus the timeline where these satellites only serve nefarious globalist purposes).

I haven't really listened to Steven Crowder, other than maybe a few minutes of some thing or another every month, but in the past week or so I've noticed a very concerted effort, by many of the "right wing" personalities on the Internet, to smear him using the exact same narrative. Something about the story and the people telling it doesn't sit right, and I don't just mean in a subtle way, I mean in a blatantly obvious way, that everyone of these people are being fed this story and told how to tell it. The narrative is even being spun by Mark Shouldice.

The reason I'm bringing this up is because I feel like there must be something that he said that was an approved. There's no way some shitty rag like the daily wire has this kind of power. I feel like Steven must have crossed (((the line))). Does anyone know more about what really happened? There's no fucking way that all of this hubbub over him is just because of some contract negotiation with some shitty newspaper. How could that really affect his listeners, etc., at least to the point of being this newsworthy... somebody here has to have come across something interesting pertaining all this.