Well it was a 2nd hand rumor that someone had heard in the first place (that they had the laptop) which made it 3rd hand knowledge, which didn't hold a lot of value on it's own. Now this? Color me shocked.

So I'll continue believing that they did not in fact have his laptop for anything.

For sure it was planned. If he had been a regular user they would have banned him for breaking the terms for harassment a long time ago, but he was a cash cow for them. So it's been in the making for a long time now. It would have to be.

So are you denying those two things happened?

Sabremesh banned me way back in the day. He's a shill, but I don't think for the deep state.

The thing about mental hoop jumping is that you can always create more loops to jump through in your own head. He isn't going to do anything in the next few days except probably pardon more corrupt people.

Apparently. When you pardon your son in law's father and war criminals that are connected to your Secretary of education, that's corrupt as hell.

Actually, it's just bad. This 4d chess winning even when he's losing spin is getting really old.

Wait, is denying climate change a requirement to like Trump? No Trump supporter at all cares about the environment and our climate?

What exactly is your argument here?

2nd most unpopular technically.

Someone gets to decide who is the shill. Much like twitter or the government. How can you not see that this is no different? Right now, as someone said above, it looks like racists and homophobes and bigots are more welcome here than people who question Trump being a good guy, which should be a worry to anyone with a soul.

Texas also changed their voter deadline, yet they were the ones suing the other states for doing the same thing. A bit hypocritical no?

I believe that Trump's intentions were always for himself. He even spent close to 100 million going right into his pocket at Mar-a-Lago. He had his children as his close advisors, which is 100% nepotism which we should all hate. Doesn't even come close to the Hunter stuff. He's screwed over thousands of contractors over his career, yet you want me to believe he's for the little guy? He constantly would do things only for red states and bitched anytime he had to help a blue state. THAT IS NOT PRESIDENTIAL AT ALL. That's a man put in place to divide. He was recorded saying he knew Covid was worse and sat on his ass and did nothing. He did not LEAD.

The country has not been in a worse place in 150 years.

I asked for the top 3 pieces of evidence, and you gave absolutely nothing to change my mind. So we're at an impasse here again.

I consider the "deep state" like many to be unelected officials that run things, not some evil cabal. The deep state is a necessary evil in government. While I do think there should be term limits to serving, making them too short is unproductive and you'd have people running things that don't know anything. 47 years is too much, 8 is probably too little.

No one is clean in politics. Is it not suspect when the president refuses to answer questions during his own impeachment trial?

I'm not convinced on mass voter fraud. There's small incidents of voter fraud in every election, nothing has shown me any solid proof that there were millions of fraudulent votes. Trump fired up BOTH sides of the electorate with his constant divisive tactics and politics, his shitty decisions, his many gaffes, his many scandals, his lies and his general lack of class yet so many are surprised when people hate him. Stop playing dumb on this and talking like you have to be brainwashed to see him as a bad president.

So again, I've looked at almost all the so called fraud evidence, and I'm not convinced.

You show me your 3 best pieces of evidence. Let's see them.

What do you mean if they were really banned? I linked to the logs. It seems the mod here banned anyone who questioned the narrative here, which seems to be only believe everything Trump/Flynn/Powell/Wood say. Why aren't we allowed to question them? Why can't someone look at all the "evidence" and come to a different conclusion than you?

You want people banned for what you consider wrong think and label them a shill so it's ok to you. This is exactly what big tech is doing now but you cheer it on, It is 100% hypocritical.

Ok, so you literally don't want to have an adult conversation here and are blinded by deity worship of some kind. I get it, Any conspiracy theorist worth a grain of salt would question the United States President refusing to answer questions on a criminal investigation. Like holy hell.

Trump was afraid to answer questions under oath. Plain and simple. He is a coward. Even scumbags pieces of shit like Bill and Hillary did.

What are you even talking about? I haven't seen anyone ever say Epstein was innocent or defend him in any way. Like.... ever. You're creating some sort of non- existant strawman here.

17 thousand accounts would have been funny.

I wasn't the one who said that. trump refused to answer questions in private by Mueller, in public by Mueller. He refused to answer questions in person by both the house and the senate.

Does that not set off a bell in a conspiracy theorists mind?

So you want tyranny of the majortiy? Get rid of the electoral college now!

Yes, he refused to talk anyone from Mueller's team in person, He answered 20 some odd questions in writing and most were "I don't recall". It's in the report. This is a fact.

Are you.... crying about 2 internet points here?

Some stars can apparently send out radio signals. I wonder if this is somehow a similar mechanism or something completely new. They say something about electrons but that science is above my pay grade.

I hate to sound negative and all, but twitter alone has about 500 million tweets per day, 300+ million users, they have a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way to go to catch up. They are also a fringe service at the time being and in the news right now so it's expected to have a boost.

Don't kid yourself though, the boost will end and Gab will continue to be a fad after that, if the man doesn't blacklist it.

I never pissed and moaned about anyone's views, all I've said is that shill accusations are worthless and to discuss ideas instead, but you keep accusing me of being a shill.

Who is it that doesn't want to discuss in good faith? Not me, it's 100% you.

Are you denying he claimed 3 million illegals voted in 2016 and that he actually won the popular vote?

Because that happened.

He also said at least a year ago the only way he could lose was fraud.

Because that happened.

And many more times. You can deny it if you want, but it's a fact and those statements were made a long time ago all building up to this.

Sorry, but this has nothing to do with the issue and Cloudflare is not a DNS server you put in a browser, it's a cloud based web defense Service.