Did i say something untrue? Is that not the argument exactly as Satan would state it?
that is definitely hiw Satan would describe it
well done: you have have stated Satan’s argument perfectly
false
this is heresy
yeah but if the ambiguity if vatican 2 can be so easily weaponized, it begs the question regarding the level of intent of that ambiguity
99% chance trump is part if the cabal
you mean the cabal that is constantly trying to destroy him?
that cabal?
false
this is not thedonald
this is conspiracies
Fresh, faggotty air
what is with your rule-breaking link?
Stylistic preference. Answer the question.
you used two commas when the second comma should have been a semicolon. So spare me the grammar nazi cocksuckery.