A dead man has no consequences for the hoax.
A maimed man will be remorseful, may speak out, may sue, may seek compensation.
for all you smooth brains out there
TGR means we do things differently.
We the feudarchs somehow gave up our power little by little after the middle ages. All was good until then. Then you rats start wanting more and more. Why?
You rats start eating up our planet resources, consuming our food, and dirtying our land.
Enough.
We take it all back and we start now
Pretty soon we will not need 93% of you because you kindly trained the machines for us.
With your help we created computers and robots to do the nasty things you used to do.
We do not wish to wreck mother Earth with more chemicals or nuclear waste to get rid of you. This is what we did in the past but we saw through our mistakes. We had to apologise to mama Earth.
We need a sustainable planet for us.
You rats are too many. Can you not see that? How do you expect us to find the resources to feed you all? Not only that you wish to have travel, have entertainment, live in large properties and you eat so much. What was wrong with the middle ages way of doing things?
So, enough with your propagation. And enough with your average life span. You live too long. Your ancestors in the middle ages lived only up to 40 years old in average.
We shall sterilise you and we will shall make you live less or die sooner (whichever comes first).
This way we will have a sustainable happy planet for us, the true inheritors and justified children of the old great race.
For those of you who will survive the initial onslaught please continue giving us your money by spending because we still need to pay you rats to fully train our AI and manufacture our robots. But fear not, 2030 is close enough.
I hope you had fun while it lasted and you managed to do something worthwhile in the mean time.
Sincerely yours,
The rightful landowners
Dot connector post...
The company uniQure has concluded that a virus used widely in gene therapy was very unlikely to have caused liver cancer in a hemophilia patient in a clinical trial.
The tumor, detected in December 2020, raised concerns that the adeno-associated virus (AAV) used to carry a loop of DNA into the patient’s liver cells had inadvertently switched on a cancer gene. But uniQure’s tests of the patient’s tumor cells showed the AAV inserted into the genome in only a tiny fraction (0.027%) of the cells, and when it did, it landed in randomly scattered spots. If the AAV had triggered a single cell to grow out of control, the viral DNA would have shown up in the same spots in lots of the tumor cells.
Let's play God shall we?
If i hear any big boys claiming "if they come I'll shoot them in their face" I am gonna freak out.
The world needs a global treaty for pandemics to protect states in the wake of Covid-19, akin to the settlement forged after the second world war, Boris Johnson and other world leaders have urged.
In a joint article published in newspapers across the world, leaders including the UK prime minister, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, warn that a future global pandemic is an inevitability and that Covid has served as “a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe”.
Escalating international tensions over vaccine supplies have led to calls for countries to abandon isolationism and nationalism, and come together to make way for a new era founded on principles like solidarity and cooperation.
The call comes from 24 world leaders, alongside the head of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and will appear in newspapers including the Telegraph in the UK, Le Monde in France and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany.
The leaders describe the pandemic as “the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s” and said that a settlement like the one formed after 1945 is needed to build cross-border cooperation before the next international health crisis.
In the joint article, they say: “At that time, following the devastation of two world wars, political leaders came together to forge the multilateral system. The aims were clear: to bring countries together, to dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and cooperation, namely peace, prosperity, health and security.”
A treaty on pandemics “should lead to more mutual accountability and shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation within the international system and with its rules and norms”, the leaders go on.
Johnson has advocated for some time for a fresh and more collaborative global approach to pandemics. Last month, he petitioned fellow G7 leaders to back the proposal, emphasising the need for better international health data-sharing.
These boys are gonna have a hella day
IBM created this Hyperledger Fabric cloud platform claiming it to be a blockchain. https://www.ibm.com/watson/health/resources/digital-health-pass-blockchain-explained/
Wrong.
There is no consensus mechanism. Per definition it is not a blockchain.
IBM’s definition of blockchain captures the distributed and immutable elements of blockchain but conveniently leaves out decentralized consensus — that’s because IBM Hyperledger Fabric doesn’t require a true consensus mechanism at all.
IBM’s architecture exposes numerous potential vulnerabilities that require a very small amount of malicious coordination. For instance, IBM introduces public-key cryptography “inside the network” with validator signatures, which fundamentally invalidates the proven security model of Bitcoin and other real blockchains, where the network can never intermediate a user’s externally-provided public key signature.
Gov. Cuomo went to his plans and they failed him. Bigly.
Some people will have a field day hacking the entrails of it.
https://informedconsentdefense.org/
Overview: The lower court refused to allow the case to proceed to an evidentiary stage definitively proving vaccines are decimating the American population. The DOJ’s strongest argument they could muster is that the scientific evidence proving the American population is being decimated by vaccines would embarrass the political elite in Washington DC. Here is the DOJ’s exact quote, “any suggestion from a court that vaccines are not safe would cause ’embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.'” Opposition Brief, page 16, line 11.
Detail: Last week the court dismissed our case on the grounds of standing (i.e., saying we can’t sue the President for the constitutional violations alleged, but rather should sue someone else). We are appealing immediately to the 9th Circuit.
Subject: UK's government has requested a public consultation and has put out a call for evidence whether COVID-status certification could play a role in reopening our economy, reducing restrictions on social contact and improving safety.
This is found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence
Call at Winners: Can we please squeeze our neurons and come up with some valid counterarguments to the following?
May I please ask all not to be funny, complacent or just deniers of the dire situation and realize that we have to demonstrate a push back. when our opinion is requested. Otherwise we are providing the moral evidence for them proceeding unchallenged. There are not many times they are asking for consultation. They need the data of non-participation to back their plans up.
May I please request that responding to this does not equal consenting to take a vaccine, admitting that there actually is a pandemic or that everything we said and discussed here (i.e. pharma, genocide etc) are not actually happening. Quite the opposite. It means that there are people in dire situation who will be forced to lose their privileges. We are trying to help these people. We all have a choice without a doubt. But if possible we would wish we would not have to take a choice. I hope we all agree in that.
Below are the questions. Give it your best shot and let's hope that the bright minds here can come with some solid and indisputable arguments.
The call for evidence is open for 2 weeks from Monday 15 March to Monday 29 March. Please submit your response by email to: [email protected]
Please keep in topic and contribute only with answers.
We (the awake and not them) are truly all in this together.
Thank you in advance all.
Question 1 Which of the following best describes the capacity in which you are responding to this call for evidence?
i am skipping the options as they describe trade groups (demographic data)
Question 2 In your view, what are the key considerations, including opportunities and risks, associated with a potential COVID-status certification scheme? We would welcome specific reference to:
a) clinical / medical considerations
b) legal considerations
c) operational / delivery considerations
d) considerations relating to the operation of venues that could use a potential COVID-status certification scheme
e) considerations relating to the responsibilities or actions of employers under a potential COVID-status certification scheme
f) ethical considerations
g) equalities considerations
h) privacy considerations
Question 3 Are there any other comments you would like to make to inform the COVID-status certification review?
It's because this community is dying. It was so alive during the last few months of Trump's term.
Posts by many users with an active engagement and discussion and some good insight and research. Even if politically motivate it kept the brain wheels going
Now we have tired link only posts by the same few people with no engagement at all.
It is basically constant whining about the leftist takeover of society. There is no conspiracy there. This is a fact of life !
Two of the admins have deleted their accounts. Why are they still under the mod banner?
Some of the users have their posts shadow banned (here's me looking at me).
We either start putting some effort and time or best let it die an honorable death.
Only for computer geeks.
If I understand correctly captcha is owned by Google.
Except from me training the AI google also gets my data (if not in possession already which I doubt).
Serious question.
Why do anti-Google sites (like this one) have captcha as a pre-requisite?
Are they all in bed with Google?
No moaning. No journalism click baiting. No bitching and crying. Not wasting time on conspiracies that lead to venting only.
Just action.
****Disclaimer: I love conspiracies but only when they lead to action. Please focus.
I believe by scanning the recent posts most posters or commentators in this forum do not believe that the risk/ benefit ration of the CoViD vazzine is a positive one, and are unlikely due to the well known risks to have it.
On the other hand a good proportion of the population who do not visit this forum are highly likely to receive the vaccination. No one has forced this to date, so the act of receiving the intervention is very much a conscious one and definitely a free choice at this stage.
"First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent" From his TedTalk in 2010.
Current population 7,8 B. 15% of that would be around 1,1 B
According to https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations#how-many-covid-19-vaccination-doses-have-been-administered 335.44 million have received it to date (March the 12th 2021).
Oof...1/3 done, 2/3 to go.
We may though be wrong. The vazzine may not have the side effects we postulate. It may or may not even protect from contacting the influenza meme called SARS-CoV2.
Imagine though if we are right and side effects will manifest as we theorize. They will not happen today or in a week but they will start appearing more than a couple of years down the line. Tumors take a while to develop.
With their wrecked immune systems they will have no chance in hell of making it to 2030 alive.
I could never imagine an easier way of getting rid of all these SJW's. They are practically untouchable in 2021.
If we can hold on...if we can just hold on...we may be able to see all these people who gladly took it just dying one by one, slowly, stop being a burden on my oxygen share of this poor planet.
If we can just hold on and happen to be right, in just a few years we may be able to live in a happier world.
A brighter future may actually happen for the selected ones thanks to Bill Gates.
if we are right we should be thankful.
He may have been right when he talked about his final solution.
Natural selection.
Sauce: Eurosurveillance
What is Eurosurveillance? Eurosurveillance is published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden. Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed scientific journal devoted to the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention and control of communicable diseases, with a focus on such topics that are of relevance to Europe. It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays, and features short rapid communications, longer in-depth research articles, surveillance and outbreak reports, reviews and perspective papers, as well as short news items.
Link to paper: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 (it's open access so read it for free !)
Title: **Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR **
Publication date: 23 January 2020
Authors: Corman et al. (24 authors in total from 6 countries and 9 different institutions)
First author (he is a German Virologist) research pedigree: almost 20000 citations as seen in https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=-GKkDt0AAAAJ
Take away point: "In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community."
Take away point 2 : "The present report describes the establishment of a diagnostic workflow for detection of an emerging virus in the absence of physical sources of viral genomic nucleic acid. Effective assay design was enabled by the willingness of scientists from China to share genome information before formal publication, as well as the availability of broad sequence knowledge from ca 15 years of investigation of SARS-related viruses in animal reservoirs."
TLDR summary: there is as of 23 January 2020 absence of physical evidence of the 2019 novel Coronavirus. China lied and the rest is speculative filling of the genome gaps
Hello,
I think it is important to deconstruct and invalidate an important argument for vaccination.
For that a group effort is required. A task group from this community so to say
I am calling for awesome members of the community who are able to spare time for such a noble task to come together to offer their time and effort.
Skills required are:
critical analysis of data, biomedical or health regulatory awareness or simply autists who can appreciate medical literature without much effort.
You do not need to disclose your background. You just acknowledge your skills by volunteering.
I do not wish to disclose the project here as the watchers are watching, so all communication will be done via encrypted applications and e-mail. You must be prepared to use an alternative burner and encrypted e-mail service for such purpose. Gmail and the likes are out of question. One off email address just for this purpose will do.
If interested to contribute and have time to spare (how much time I do not know at this point) please DM me here.
Disclaimer: I do not know the outcome of the research question. I hope that the findings will invalidate the argument for compulsory vaccination but this cannot be guaranteed. The outcome may be against the anti-vaccination argument. I want to find out the truth no matter what the outcome is.
Disclaimer2: I am capable to carry out the research on my own however I will need so much time that when I reach a conclusion it may be too late.
Disclaimer3: upon reach of the conclusion we will all vote equally (one person one vote) whether the conclusion should be shared and with whom. The latter is the most important to decide.
So, I want to contribute to the public consultation about the necessity of digital identities as presented by the UK government.
Can we all squeeze our ridge brains and come up with arguments against the necessity of digital identities please?
It is given that the government(s) as a given has covered the areas of privacy/data protection, fraud, inclusivity of services and security therefore more (or stronger on the previous ones) arguments are required.
Please let's all come together to make a solid argument against the need of digital identities.
Here's the porposal if interested to read the arguments for https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework
We have until 12pm on Thursday 11 March 2021
and if so why did he not use this legal team for his election challenge cases instead of using biblical cuckoos and conspiracy lawyers?
His defense this week was really solid in my humble opinion (not a lawyer but I can understand the arguments when I hear them) and focused on which words he used during his speeches etc
What 2020 taught me.
God cares about the conservatives and the outcome of the US elections. Jesus will most likely intervene to influence the outcome and favor light over darkness.
On the other side some atheists like https://web.archive.org/web/20210207221448/https://elamerican.com/mike-podhorzer-architect-electoral-conspiracy/ are doing this https://web.archive.org/web/20210207093240/https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ to fight against Lord Jesus and God.
I am taking bets on who may win. Surely, Jesus and God, right?
This is a call to all Winners.
Mods cannot do everything for us. We need self discipline and self awareness.
Let's divide our efforts and conquer the information flow.
Many of us ended up here as exiles from the Great Reddit Purge or the sudden Voat shutdown.
Many of us are interested in politics, conspiracies, social engineering and the like. Let us therefore clean up the space so we can focus and build back better (sic).
Conspiracies.Win https://conspiracies.win/ is a forum for just that. Conspiracies. Two or more people agreeing behind outr back to do something without disclosing their agenda. Insert here: lizards, ET's, flat earth, 9/11, plandemics etc.
Patriots.Win https://patriots.win/ (ex: TheDonald.win) is a forum for US (maybe for now) politics talk focusing on the Republican party, Donald Trump and the possibility of a new Patriot party. You like politics, election fraud etc? Discuss them here...
GreatAwakening.Win https://greatawakening.win/ is a forum for anything Q related. Are the patriots in control? Is X22 a godsend? Where is DJT? Planefagging? Is Joe Biden a drone? Is the Oval office in Joe Biden's basement? Discuss these here.
I am sure there is some crossover but if you keep in mind who you wnat to talk to perhaps this can act as a guide.
NB: I am not a mod, just a plain Winner !
They talk about inclusion and social justice.
And yet...
What about us who are hearing and visually impaired
How am I supposed to follow this important livestream https://www.weforum.org/events/the-davos-agenda-2021 if I cannot hear or see?
