-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +4 / -5

So tell me, how would you reform it? With big government deciding what should be censored?

Explain to me the reforms you would enact.

-3
NelsonMandelaffect -3 points ago +1 / -4

Responses are like this are worthless and should be beneath actual truth seekers. Address what I said or fuck off to the Donald cunt.

-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +2 / -3

Again I don't know what you want me to say. Should NASA have waited until the technology was created to verify/film them going?

I think it's a stupid argument and worthless.

-3
NelsonMandelaffect -3 points ago +2 / -5

Threatening my life on the internet over my take on an intelligence asset. Fucking nice dude.

-2
NelsonMandelaffect -2 points ago +1 / -3

Remember that time Paul Manafort got caught sending internal polling data to Russians?

Didn't seem to matter then, doesn't seem like this will matter now.

Just saying.

-3
NelsonMandelaffect -3 points ago +1 / -4

Do I wish we had a better zoom in things?

Yes. Then I would have been able to get a better picture of wild turkeys last week.

I'm not sure what kind of answer you're expecting here.

-2
NelsonMandelaffect -2 points ago +1 / -3

The metadata as I said it's a dead end and useless.

Until someone can give me one iota of proof that Seth rich had access to take the emails, or that he was some sort of hacker, I will continue to press x to doubt.

The fact that it's being pushed so hard by only right wing sources also makes me doubt it. Think of who gained from spreading the story. Have you ever asked yourself that question honestly?

-3
NelsonMandelaffect -3 points ago +1 / -4

I tend to believe did a little more when it's not just coming from one side of the spectrum, which is why I like to read both left wing and right wing sources. Often the truth is something in the middle.

Enjoy the show!

-4
NelsonMandelaffect -4 points ago +2 / -6

Are you seriously telling me to trust a top US intelligence asset on a conspiracy forum?

Hahahaha. Fuck me.

-2
NelsonMandelaffect -2 points ago +1 / -3

I know as a data analyst in any company with a grain of salt, he would not have had access to the emails.

I know that no one had ever been able to prove that he even had access our opportunity to take the emails. You don't just walk into a server room, plop in a usb and walk away with every email.

I know his family said he was 100% behind Hillary and was happy about a promotion he got our was getting.

No one had been able to answer the access question. They are starting with a conclusion and working backwards. Until sometime could prove to me that he could have taken then and exactly how, in not going to believe the fantasy.

As I said, I've worked in IT for 23 years or so. I have high standards for this.

-11
NelsonMandelaffect -11 points ago +1 / -12

Maybe that was all a show. His take on metadata is still wrong and stupid. Also never said he was a nobody, he also admitted to being a Trump supporter, but let's not question anything that involves Trump and former(?) intelligence agents.

0
NelsonMandelaffect 0 points ago +3 / -3

You shut your commie mouth Alex got big dick energy.

-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +1 / -2

While I agree with this, they have bounced powerful lasers off the surface before the mirrors were placed. Hitting the mirrors is possible with a weaker laser 100% but landing deniers will tell you that you just got a rock that was more reflective or something than the terrain around it. So this is not good proof really, and I believe we did land by the way.

-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +1 / -2

And as for the Dominion contractor, she needs to back up her words. So far she's proven absolutely nothing but had talked a big game.

Back it up I say.

-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +1 / -2

Good for her, she can keep releasing reports and they can keep being laughed at. Her last kraken was unprofessional at best and had 2 obvious spelling mistakes in the first two sentences. It was filled with conjecture and in my opinion nonsense. Nothing came of it. Nothing will come of it. It was laughed out of court by judges smarter than me.

She's a lawyer and defences a piece of shit like Flynn. I don't trust lawyers especially when they only make their claims in press conferences and not in the court of law under oath.

Next kraken please

-2
NelsonMandelaffect -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not gonna happen when the guy running the show loves posting right wing twitter nonsense.

-2
NelsonMandelaffect -2 points ago +1 / -3

I haven't read any hit piece on him. I read his AMA and his direct words which were BULLSHIT. I've worked in IT for 23 years, InfoSec for the past 11. His metadata debunk was dumb as shit and so was the speed debunk.

Let's say the meta data did show USB transfer speeds, fine I'll totally give him that. It just shows the last transfer. It doesn't keep a history. It doesn't mean that they were taken from the servers by usb. The files could have been transferred 1000 times before that last transfer, then put on usb, then given to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks themselves could have our them on usb just to hide the previous metadata.

It does not show in any way shape or form that there was no hack. It's a dumb and uneducated talking point and people clueless about IT lap it up.

This is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe me, but you'd be won't not to.

-3
NelsonMandelaffect -3 points ago +2 / -5

Yes, all religions are conspiracies and should be treated as the nonsense they are.

-7
NelsonMandelaffect -7 points ago +1 / -8

As for contrarian I thought I just believed everything the MSM spouted. You guys really gotta get your stories straight when it comes to accusing me of things.

-7
NelsonMandelaffect -7 points ago +1 / -8

I think you completely missed the point here, maybe intentionally, but I don't really care.

-1
NelsonMandelaffect -1 points ago +1 / -2

If the she is Sydney Powell, you'll see that she never made most of these ridiculous claims in court, and any she did eye thrown out as nonsense.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›