By that same process of thought, it doesn't matter if the moon landings were real or not, it doesn't matter if the Titanic sinking was an accident or planned. It doesn't matter if existence itself is tangible or entirely fabricated by the subconscious mind.
If we base our thinking along those lines, this site would not have purpose.
Like many others here, I am interested in rationalizing the reasons as to WHY, in the interests of furthering understanding. That is the whole point, to discuss and find rationale and thus, meaning behind why events play out the way they do, as well as the implications and motives behind them, the "WHY".
In order to substantiate or refute ideas and give them meaning, evidence, opinion, thought and motivation must be explored. Motive is equally as important as result.
The more you look around, the more you realize that the majority of people are just empty shells, walking around with no cognitive thought to speak of. NPC is real.
It could very well be true, but it could also be another smokescreen to cover up for the sudden increase in 'mysterious' deaths that have been happening lately.
I don't suppose you have a link to the documentary do you? I'd be very interested in watching.
I see where you are coming from, although we are talking across each other.
My question was not whether or not elections are real or rigged or hoaxes or if the winner mattered. My question was who would come out as the torch holder.
You are fundamentally correct in that election speculation inherently makes no difference. The agenda will continue regardless, and the results have already been decided and concluded regardless. I don’t disagree with your conclusion either.
However, as you alluded to, those on this site are here because they question things and seek truth, which exists on different planes of significance. My post was focused on a microcosm within a broader macrocosm. A macrocosm upon which your response is focused.
There is always a broader picture to consider, however that does not mean that speculation on all levels does not matter. The examples I provided substantiate that point, in the grand scheme of things, speculating upon them isn’t going to change anything, regardless of how much truth is known. Does that mean they don’t matter? Your response suggests otherwise.
When it comes to things that are outside of our control, knowing whether or not they exist, are real or are hoaxes or whatever ultimately changes nothing, but that does not mean that questions should not be asked or that answers on all planes should not be sought out regardless of their perceived significance.