Yea, it's on Tucker, but if this topic and spiritual warfare interests you, it's worth the time to have on in the background while you do your chores.
The Secret History of Biblical Giants, Demons, and the Advanced Civilizations Before the Great Flood https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-stephen-de-young-052926
Is it on purpose, or a side effect?
Those who are detached, or smart enough or lucky enough to come into contact with family or friends who can help them disassociate themselves from "big food" and "big pharma" and the "medical-industrial complex" are often the most healthy. These crunchy mom types are actually having kids, and living long enough to have offspring trained up in their ways.
By disassociate, I don't mean try to use chi to fix a broken bone, but they are wise enough not to take statins, change their diet to avoid refined grains...you get the idea. Everybody needs an ambulance for accidents, or even an antibiotic or two.
Anybody have any good examples?
For example...while I was caught up saying "Epstein didn't kill himself" and others were saying "of course, I trust the government's story" those of us who don't trust the government we puffed up on the idea that we weren't suckers....but what I think most likely happened is that he was smuggled out of prison and there was a body swap.
But the story that he was seen elsewhere or not really dead was always there is the background. People like me wanted him dead so at least it seemed like there was some justice in this world. However, when even the normies came to the conclusion that the Epstein story didn't add up....the 2nd layer of narrative was there...which is to say that he got away with it. THAT is what they really want you to take away from the whole thing.
Or at least that's my opinion.
Any other examples?
A KGB agent and a CIA agent are at a bar. The CIA agent compliments the KGB on their propaganda. The KGB agent replied that American propaganda is even better, so good that even the people who make it fall for it. The CIA agent, offended, protests that the American government does not make propaganda.
I long ago stopped paying much attention to proposed bills. I pay attention to something that is about to be signed, or is signed, by the executive. One thing that was useful I learned from political science is that virtually all of the "proposed bills" have zero chance of passing. It's posturing for the rubes back in the home district so they can say; "I sponsored a bill that would do XYZ awesome thing" when either the House or Senate leadership would never take up such an item, and the thing never ever makes it out of committee. The other thing is, I really pay attention to things barnacled onto "must pass" spending bills like the annual defense appropriations act and so on.
I get that Corbett is one of the OG alternative media types, with a lot of good things to say, and that since he's in Japan he can have a bit of detachment.
But it's really disingenuous for libertardians to live in a place like Japan, where libertarianism and anarchy is a luxury belief, and advocate it for everyone else outside of a place like Japan.
Has any of the ufologists around here learned that anything of value was released?
Anybody know about this more than in passing?
Just a random gay black weirdo with an ax to grind. They didn't off the guy and scrub his social media. Certainly not a MK Ultra'd fellow at the very least.
Good points here that I agree with from Mat Walsh.
Ubiquitous and socially, emotionally and ultimately physically damaging universally available hard core porn with images the likes of which might shock Caligula that children can and do readily access….
Or
Age verification laws meant to limit children’s access to hard core porn but which also is being piggy backed into the digital gulag they are building?
Cut the Gordian knot. The solution to the paradox is to ban porn, like it used to be 40 years ago and society still functioned and before Jew lawyers won “free speech” cases. If you protest this, you are a gooner.
Here is a post about the “enshitification” of modern life I found on Gab that is worth sharing.
——————
Blair Cottrell
@RealBlairCottrell
4h · AU · Last week I spoke with a mate of mine who does computer software engineering.
He’s been doing that for a while so out of curiosity I asked him, “What’s the best computer I could buy these days?”
“Windows?” He asked.
“Yeah.”
He told me they’re basically all the same thing.
“You could spend $500 or $5000, you’re only paying more for better components. The system is essentially the same.”
“What do you mean?” I asked. “Obviously a $5k PC would run better than a $500 laptop.”
“It would run better.” He agreed. “But the base operating system is the same. It’s the same machine, just with different components.”
He went on:
“They’ve been the same machines for around 25 years. There’s been no major breakthrough since then, everything just got shrunk down and components became more efficient, but in essence all computers functionally operate the same way they did when we were 10 or 15 years old.”
“We don’t create anything anymore. We just remake trendy, cost-effective emulations of what was new 25 years ago.”
While driving home I kept replaying in my mind what he’d said to me, because I sensed there was something profound in it.
After a couple days I realised what he’d said pertained to literally everything.
I thought about what life was like 20-25 years ago. I recalled films like the Lord of The Rings trilogy and the Star Wars prequels, then compared the brilliant originality of ‘back then’ to the crude emulations of the same recycled stories sold by Hollywood today.
“Cost-effective” but insipid and lifeless copies.
I looked at my phone and realised it’s essentially the same phone I’ve had for about 20 years now. The cameras are better but every ‘new phone model’ is the same one as before with minor component updates.
The food was another example. 25 years ago what we ate wasn’t predominantly vegetable oil and carcinogenic additives. Now everything will make you sick, because it’s all a “cost-effective” mass produced copy of the real food we used to eat.
But the big realisation came when I paid attention to the people themselves.
If you stop and look around at ordinary consumers in any major shopping centre or supermarket, you can’t deny they’re typically very fat, disabled or retarded, if not then they’re Indian, Black or Chinese.
25 years ago this wasn’t the norm. People were relatively healthy and White. Immigrants and visibly handicapped people were something well & truly out of the ordinary.
The quality of the Western peasantry had suffered the same fate as our film, literature and technology. They were seized upon by merchants who halted their development in order to refine them into a crude but more profitable emulation of their original form.
They had been made “cost-effective”.
If you’ve read this far that old Christian proverb ought to come into focus: the love of money being the root of all evil.
Moon landing skeptics have lost one big tool in their toolbelt of arguments, which is the one where they say “how come we can’t go back with year XXXX technology if we could with 1960s technology.”
First off, you had Nazis and white men running NASA back then, and we have now bootstrapped the tech to go back again in 2026.
So sure, lots of things you could say about the moon landing, but you can’t say we don’t have the technology now so therefor it is impossible we did then.
Besides, look at how much else in the world has gone to hell. Should it be a surprise that NASA went to pot as well? Nope.