The Didache, Clement of Rome, Epistle of Barnabas, The Shepherd of Hermas, Polycarp, Papias of Hierapolis, Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Cyprian, Aphrahat, and many others... All writings or writers that reference the New Testament and Jesus before the Council of Nicaea in 325.
Regarding non-Christian writers or writings that reference the historical Jesus, we have Josephus, Tacitus, Celsus, and the Mishnah, to name a few...
Well, MANY other writers, Christian and non, were referencing the New Testament books before the Council of Nicaea in the 4th Century, so that's wrong, and non-Christians writers, like Josephus, even acknowledged that the historical Jesus existed... I would recommend you study history more. God bless!
He's wrong. The Rabbinical Jews that exist today are the descendants of the Pharisees. It's easy to see if you study the history. Sounds like this guy didn't.
True, but since I have been permabanned off YouTube (I've tried to make new accounts, and they somehow ban me, even though I have a VPN and everything) Rumble and Bitchute are probably the best video hosting sites I can use to reach more people.
Thanks! God bless!
I can play instruments and sing, and have been in several bands and choirs. The problem is that writing and producing songs takes A LONG TIME. I have played in multiple bands and have participated in the writing, practicing, rehearsing, recording, producing, and mastering parts of song creation, and it takes hours and hours and at least $100s per song for the whole process (and this is for poor bands with no label representation). That's why I have to disagree with you here. Writing songs via AI is much quicker and inexpensive and a breath of fresh air, if your purpose is to create propaganda, like mine it. I think of it this way: If I wanted to create great works of art, musically, then yes, the organic process is the way to go. But essentially what I am doing with the AI music is creating musical memes, not brilliant works of art, and since memes are supposed to be quickly, efficiently generated pieces of propaganda, I see the AI music as a VERY useful tool to create musical propaganda that can be used against the Judeo-Freemasonic establishment. Hopefully, this makes sense. God bless!
Sounds like you aren’t a fan of Jewgrass
In Christian Tradition, the definition of "hate" is willing malevolence towards another, which, of course, is different than the modern definition of "hate", which basically means intense dislike. Yes, I intensely dislike the Jews for subverting Christian society and persecuting Christians, which is why I want to get the word out that they are doing this. No, I don't will malevolence on them. In fact, my will is that they convert and become Catholic, so that they can go to Heaven, which is a form of love the Greek Bible calls "agape", which means willing the best for another for their sake. For the sake of the souls of the Jews, I will them to convert in order to go to Heaven, which is the greatest form of love I can possibly have for them, even though, yes, I intensely dislike them. Is this clearer now?
Just for the record, I don't hate Jews. God bless.
Yeah, I have watched that many times lol. It's overall pretty good, and entertaining, even though there are some little theological errors lol.
Amen! He says it in Romans 3:28 too!
I hope you got what you wanted. We will see...
Thanks! I appreciate the kind words!
My personal conspiracy theory is that the "wailing wall" is just a part of a wall of a large bathroom the Romans built up after they destroyed Jerusalem.
Thus, every time the Jews do their "sexual thrusting prayer" (sorry, don't know what else to call that abomination that they do) they are simulating sex with a pagan Roman bathroom.
This is merely speculation on my part, but I think it fits!
That's mere Christianity. You are not even Christian. At best you are Ebionite or Arian.
That’s heresy my friend. St. John in the Gospel According to St. John chapter 1 says Jesus is the Word, who was with God (the Father) and is God Himself. And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. Denying Jesus’s divinity is the heresy of both the Ebonites (an early “Jewish Christian” sect) and the Arians (which prompted the First Council of Nicaea to condemn their heresy). If you don’t know the divinity of Jesus Christ then you cannot know God the Father.
And yes, St. John's disciple, St. Ignatius DOES condemn your views in the next 2 sentences after the one I quoted:
"If any one confesses Christ Jesus the Lord, but denies the God of the law and of the prophets, saying that the Father of Christ is not the Maker of heaven and earth, he has not continued in the truth any more than his father the devil, and is a disciple of Simon Magus, not of the Holy Spirit. If any one says there is one God, and also confesses Christ Jesus, but thinks the Lord to be a mere man, and not the only- begotten God, and Wisdom, and the Word of God, and deems Him to consist merely of a soul and body, such an one is a serpent, that preaches deceit and error for the destruction of men. And such a man is poor in understanding, even as by name he is an Ebionite."
I would suggest repenting and educating yourself while there is still time!
Your exegesis is incorrect. Let me show you why.
John 8:44 says: "You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof."
Revelation 2:9 says: "I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Revelation 3:9 says: "Behold, I will bring of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie. Behold, I will make them to come and adore before thy feet. And they shall know that I have loved thee."
Those are the words of Christ. And I acknowledge that you could interpret Him saying that the Jews who don't worship Him are fake Jews (the Catholic position) or that He didn't mean that (your position).
Thus, we have to look at a different source to figure out the correct exegesis, since it isn't clear.
So we know St. John the Apostle wrote all of those above passages, but he didn't clarify in writing what Christ meant either... So who should we go to?
Well, as it turns out, St. John the Apostle had a couple of proteges in the early Church. One was named St. Ignatius of Antioch.
In his epistle to the Philadelphians, St. Ignatius says:
"If anyone preaches the one God of the law and the prophets, but denies Christ to be the Son of God, he is a liar, even as also is his father the devil, and is a Jew falsely so called, being possessed of mere carnal circumcision."
Let me unpack this quote for you: St. Ignatius is referencing his teacher, St. John the Apostle, in this quote and referencing specifically John 8:44 ("he is a liar, even as also is his father the devil") and Revelation 2:9/3:9 ("Jew falsely so called"). St. Ignatius is telling us that through St. John's inspired Scripture, Jesus Christ is telling us that Jews who practice the Law but deny Christ are the Synagogue of Satan.
And I am inclined to trust the exegesis of St. Ignatius, protege of the beloved Apostle, St. John, over the exegesis of anyone in the 21st Century. Hopefully, you will agree that it is most prudent to trust this exegesis over more modern exegesis that is essentially preaching a "new gospel". God bless!
Oh, I don't disagree with you there. I am not saying that the hierarchy isn't full of corrupt men. My point, and it still stands, is that the official teaching of the Church stands unaffected, even by these Neo-Judaizers that lie about it.
Here is what these passages say:
'The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People, "the first to hear the Word of God." The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God's revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews "belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ", "for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable."
And when one considers the future, God's People of the Old Covenant and the new People of God tend towards similar goals: expectation of the coming (or the return) of the Messiah. But one awaits the return of the Messiah who died and rose from the dead and is recognized as Lord and Son of God; the other awaits the coming of a Messiah, whose features remain hidden till the end of time; and the latter waiting is accompanied by the drama of not knowing or of misunderstanding Christ Jesus.'
First and foremost, the CCC is NOT protected under infallibility (like the Bible and Church Dogmas), and thus, it can contain errors.
Secondly, let's break these passages down.
The first paragraph is true. The Jews received Divine Revelation from God before the Gentiles did. We Christians call this the Old Testament. This paragraph is exegeting Romans 9-11.
The second paragraph is also true. Both Christians and Jews do await the coming of the Messiah (for us Christians, it will be the Second Coming, as the Jews reject that He already came once).
The problem with the CCC (and this is the same thing you can say about Vatican 2's Nostra Aetate) is not that line-by-line it is saying anything incorrect, but rather what it DOESN'T SAY and the CHANGE OF TONE from previous Magisterium.
In other words, it's cherry picking things that are technically true but simultaneously staying away from important truths about the relationship between Christians and Jews that have always been there.
Thus, there are no changes, but rather important omissions of truths that still persist.
Not true. There are MANY orthodox Catholics like myself that oppose these Judaizer errors, and I have proven time and time again that these errors go against official Church teaching.
Yes. That influenced the Protestants in the early 20th Century, though. Unfortunately, since Vatican II, the dispensationalist nonsense has infiltrated the Catholic Church.
Honestly, I am not sure what you are trying to ask here, but...
Regarding the 'magi' (whose singular form is 'magus') they are included in the Bible to show that even the Zoroastrians, who were notorious astrologers, were able to see the signs in the sky that the Messias was born, and accepted Him as the awaited Savior (perhaps also to give a bigger slap in the face of the perfidious Jews who refused to see it, even though it was obvious to those of other religions).
The Magisterium of the Church actually has nothing to do with the Persian Zoroastrian magi though... (they are just near-homographs from 2 different languages). Magisterium is Latin for "teaching body", which means the Pope and the Bishops (who were given apostolic succession by the apostles who were given express authority by Christ Himself to "bind and loose" regarding the Faith).
It's not a theory... I am speaking fact.
I don't have time to give you a more authoritative source but here is a Wikipedia article on how the Pharisees that escaped Jerusalem after its destruction in 70 AD created Rabbinical Judaism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbinic_Judaism#:~:text=Rabbinic%20Judaism%20has%20its%20roots,orally%2C%20explains%20the%20Written%20Torah.
Look at the footnotes for more authoritative sources.
Heck, do a Google search and you will find several Jewish websites that talk about the history of Judaism and they openly admit that Rabbinical Judaism was created by Pharisees....
This is not even a controversial point to make. It's just hard, easily provable fact.