Also, when King Henry VIII wanted to get his divorce from Catherine of Aragon, he consulted Jews to help him figure out how to use the OId Testament as a defense of divorce. And we all know what happened: He broke away from the Catholic Church and create the Anglican "Church" in order to get his divorce(s).
I agree with your first paragraph 100%.
Regarding the second paragraph, your "hunch" is correct. Dr. E. Michael Jones talks about how the Jews were heavily involved in the Reformation in his modern classic: The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. 100% recommend. Here's a link:
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit
Oh, I will pray for him... I pray for everyone, especially my haters! He's probably not a bad person. He seems to be a bit mentally disturbed, obsessive, and probably on the lower-end IQ-wise. He needs someone to guide him on how to interpret the Bible because he cannot do so himself, but unfortunately, he has given into pride and thinks he is capable of sound exegesis. It's sad, really.
Good for you! Yeah, I am a full time dad and husband, with a full time day job, and I run this Catholic apostolate, along with co-running a local Catholic Action group, so I don't have time to respond to all of my online haters, unless they have a lot of influence. But this u/Neo1 guy just keeps attacking me out of nowhere and uses Biblical verses out of context to "pwn me bruh" and it's just not worth my already fleeting time.
Maybe? People bug me about "not answering him"... So I unblocked him temporarily yesterday to see if he had anything worth answering... Not really... I answered some of his posts, but it was mostly just him hypocritically calling me a "spammer" while he was unironically spamming this community with posts against me lol.
I just want to go on the record in saying that I am NOT pro-Trump. I have criticized Trump for being too pro-Jewish. I will vote for neither Trump nor Kamala because I do believe that if you vote for either Democrats or Republicans that your votes ultimately go to Jews, which is why I wrote this song:
You can always choose to block me or just ignore my posts. This will fix your problem. Have a great day, and God bless!
Lol I know, right!?
Just so it's public, I am blocking u/Neo1 because he's a a hypocrite and has no desire to engage me in a civil way. I was asking him about what sect he was in to see how I could dialogue with him, but he just spewed stupidity at me. So if you guys want to know why I don't respond to his posts, this is why: You cannot see posts of those you blocked. Have a great day! God bless!
I don't know who are upvoting me, but I do thank them for their support.
Here are the facts:
-
You DID NOT go to me privately when you misinterpreted my post(s) to go against Christian teaching. Instead you KVETCHED all over c/Conspiracies, and you don't even believe that Christ established a Church to go to, so you are NOT even following Matthew 18:15-17 yourself, you brain-dead HYPOCRITE!
-
Geez... I sure hope you never called you own dad "father" or else you are clearly breaking the rule of Matthew 23:9... (rolls eyes)
Or, you know, perhaps Jesus was saying that there is only one HEAVENLY Father - God the Father - and wasn't saying that you couldn't literally call your own dad "father". And this is why you need a Church to interpret Scripture - because low IQ MORONS like Neo1 will interpret Scripture in stupid ways.
- You're blind to your OWN HYPOCRISY and STUPIDITY. You call me a spammer, and yet you SPAM c/Conspiracies about me. You say you're a "Biblical-only Christian" and yet quote Jesus talking about the Church. YOU ARE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND. And YOU are exactly WHY Jesus founded a Church to interpret the Bible because you are sooo STUPID and HYPOCRITICAL that you are a DANGER to yourself and others!
I'm not watching your stupid, like Seventh Day Adventist-produced, videos. They just make up a bunch up BS about Catholics because they are LIARS, like YOU.
Geez... I sure hope you never called you own dad "father" or else you are clearly breaking the rule of Matthew 23:9... (rolls eyes)
Or, you know, perhaps Jesus was saying that there is only one HEAVENLY Father - God the Father - and wasn't saying that you couldn't literally call your own dad "father". And this is why you need a Church to interpret Scripture - because low IQ MORONS like Neo1 will interpret Scripture in stupid ways.
I don't go against real Christianity. I just go against your false interpretation of Christianity. You are a heretic and schismatic, so your opinion means squat.
And you're a hypocrite too, since you copied and pasted this response...
I don't go against real Christianity. I just go against your false interpretation of Christianity. You are a heretic and schismatic, so your opinion means squat.
I am in the Church that Jesus Christ founded. You're the one that rejects His Church.
September 8th is the date the Catholic Church celebrates Mary's birthday because it's exactly 9 months after the Church celebrates the Immaculate Conception on December 8th. The fact is we really don't know when her birthday is, so the Church set a date aside to celebrate it.
That's the thing... consistency with pre-established Scripture IS MOST DEFINITELY a requirement for the teaching of a Pope to be infallible. If the Pope BLATANTLY contradicts Scripture in his Magisterium, then we are, again, obliged to DISREGARD his teaching.
The fact of the matter is that the Pope's authority is pretty limited. He is bound by Scripture, Tradition (the verbal and written beliefs that Catholics have held for 2000 years), and the Magisterium of previous Popes. IF HE CONTRADICTS THOSE, THEN WE CANNOT ASSENT.
However, IF HE DOESN'T CONTRADICT THOSE AND HE OFFICIALLY TEACHES A MATTER OF FAITH AND MORALS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE, THEN WE MUST ASSENT.
Understand?
So Popes actually have a very narrow scope of authority. Their primary purpose is to govern the Church and secondly to decide matters of disagreement amongst the Faithful, and they are BOUND to Scripture, Tradition, and Magisterium themselves when doing the latter.
u/Neo1 you know I am a Catholic... What sect of Christianity are you?
u/Neo1 you know I am a Catholic... What sect of Christianity are you?
u/Neo1 you know I am a Catholic... What sect of Christianity are you?
I just reread everything in our conversation. I never "dodged" your questions. I answered them. I just answered them in a way that didn't fit your misconception on the authority of the Pope, and you referred to it as a "loophole" because you are anti-Catholic and frankly just want to argue instead of listen. Again, yes we can disagree with the Pope if he publicly tells the Jewish Mainstream Media his "politically correct" opinions on things. Moreover, if he misrepresents the Faith (and the current Pope has done this multiple times, unfortunately) we can publicly rebuke him for doing that as well, and of course, disobey following him in his error. What we as Catholics CANNOT do is disobey the Pope when he officially teaches a matter of Faith and morals that is CONSISTENT with known Catholic teaching.
Lol! "because it doesn't exist"... You said it yourself... As a Catholic I am not bound to assent to Magisterium that doesn't exist. Thanks! God bless!
Can you show me Magisterial teaching where he made it clear that the faithful are bound to receive the vaccine under pain of sin?
I know, I am such an awful person sharing my original content with you all... And it's not like you can just exercise self-control and not click it if you don't like it, you know? Exercising self-control and ignoring me if you don't like my stuff is just CRAZY TALK!!! :-O