Simple question. How do you know I'm a real person?

Things like ChatGPT have existed for decades. Automating it is stupidly easy. It's been done for a long time now.

Guess we'll all need a digital ID soon so we can make sure we're talking to a real person, right?

Guess that digital ID will be as easy to fake as any response coming from a paid actor in front of a camera. Right?

How do you know I'm a real person writing this? How do you know if I'm your friend, enemy, or someone who just doesn't give a fuck and wants to get paid enough so they can live in a house, drive a car, and maybe go fishing on the weekend?

How do you know an AI didn't write this. And how do you know you're not just part of an experiment. Because I can guarantee you, that you are. But how do you know.

How do you know?

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2012/7/21/1112509/-The-Gentleperson-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies

I'm sure we're all familiar with the information above. It's been automated and weaponized for ages. It barely requires any human input anymore.

There's plenty of different types of online personas it creates too. The user who posts cat videos but sometimes dabbles in politics. The hard core lefty who gradually becomes a righty. The hard core righty who gradually becomes a lefty. "People" who post real information consistently, and then start filtering in the propaganda. And, the reverse.

It used to all be done manually. Teams of people. Some of which still function. Many in fact. But the AI has put a lot of people out of a job, or, into another one.

"ChatGPT" is a silly drop in the public bucket. We don't even have the term "discourse weapons" in the public lexicon yet. Or "data weapons". Or "Information weapons". And there's a good chance we never will. Not even TikTok is being labeled that way, even by the US legislators who want to ban it. Wonder why.

Most everything you read, watch, or hear online, is a trick. Including this. And Infact, be wary of people who tell you something like that. "Don't take my word for it, do your own research" is just a lovely little tactic to build trust and prevent someone from looking into something.

There's a place in your center. A quiet place. You can visit it if you cultivate good men and women in your life, and build strong bonds and relationships. You can cultivate a light of truth with that genuinely positive energy. It takes time, and growth. But when you find that light in the center, I guarantee you, the blinders will fall off. At least, the first set will. There are many. But bit by bit, you'll arrive at a place where you can see truth behind any lie, regardless of what it is.

It's a process. If you think you're fully there, you're not. You will never be "fully" there. And when the first bliders fall off, you'll think you are. And when the second ones fall off, you'll realize how far you still have to go.

Everything is layers. Be willing to get rid of the ones you no longer need, and look through the layers around you to see what's there. And always assume that your opponent is smarter than you are. Learn from them, stop playing their game, and make them play yours.

Make them, play your game.

Hit me up. This space is being wasted and I can tell you exactly what's going on, why, and what to fix.

Hi everyone. I'm a professional art historian and teach at a college. I love topics like ancient aliens, conspiracies, and all of that jazz. That's why I'm here. But I wanted to talk about the Georgia Guidestones. There's a huge amount of misinformation surrounding them.

There's nothing actually nefarious about them. They were funded because a small group of people (some of who may have been Rosicrucians) who were scared that the cold war between the US and Russia would lead to nuclear Armageddon. They wanted to put together a set of "guides" for the survivors of that apocalypse. That's what the Guidestones are.

Now, do the elites of this world want to reduce the population? Absolutely. Will they do horrifying things to accomplish this? Likely yes. Are the Georgia Guidestones part of those nefarious plots? No, I do not believe so. I believe the guidestones, to the very best of my research, were funded by a small group of people who feared nuclear war, and wanted to leave behind some semblance of a marker for the humans who might survive it.

Do I personally subscribe to each ideal left in the Guidestones? Not particularly. I think they were well meaning though. Let's say you and your friends were multi millionaires. And you got together one night over drinks, and you were all in agreement that nuclear apocalypse was on the horizon. And you decided to do what you could, no matter how small the effort, to try to ensure the continuation of the human race. You put together your own set of guidelines which you felt might work after such an event, paid to put them into stone, and set up a monolith which you hoped would withstand the event. That's what the Guidestones are.

It's boring, I know. But every bit of research I have done into them shows that this is the real truth about them.

I'm not saying that shadowy cabals aren't conspiring to control the world, kill people, start wars, reduce the population, and I'm not saying that very powerful ruling families do not dictate the fate of billions of us.

I'm just saying that in my research, the Guidestones were not built by those people. They were built by fairly ordinary people with a bunch of money who were afraid of a global nuclear event.

Just wanted to share that with everyone. Take it or leave it, it's all good.