It's to reinforce the narrative that the capitol hill riot was an insurrection hell-bent on the murder of our innocent enlightened politicians. Also a virtue signal by Trump to destroy the narrative that he is leading a coup.
s much as I want to believe it, I sincerely doubt it.
Because the corporate media never lies
Nevada
Now show me Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. The states that mattered.
1000s of sworn affidavits, statistical analysis by professional mathematicians, video evidence of votes being counted without proper oversight, counties that counted more than double the votes than they have legal age voters, and dominion machines being connected to the Internet when they weren't supposed to be. If that's not substantial, I don't know what is.
Also, what you or I consider substantial is moot. My point is that the judges never made a ruling on the evidence.
Wether you think the cases failed due to shitty lawyers or purposeful stonewalling is up to interpretation. However, because none of the cases got to the point where evidence was presented in court, it is objectively incorrect to claim the cases failed because evidence was not substantial.
It was posted in OP, and twice by me. Here''s a third time because your zoomer brain can't into reading
"there is no evidence this man is part of blm"
Shows video evidence
"There is no evidence he was serious"
Nice goalpost moving you got there.
As requested https://twitter.com/i/status/1348795134100566017
Of course, you could have also just read OP
Ngo Identified him as part of BLM
EDIT: video evidence https://twitter.com/i/status/1348795134100566017
Up to that point, right wingers weren't doing the whole burn loot murder shindig, so covering their ears and shouting lalala was the safest bet.
There were many reasons the cases were thrown out. None of them were for lack of evidence or unsubstantial evidence.
*based on evidence that was to be presented in a bunch of court cases that failed because the judges refused to hear them for one bullshit reason or another.
Because they like their jobs, and their families, so they refused brave the inevitable riots and threats to their personal lives.
There isn't a debate about the shape of the earth. It's a bunch of glowies flooding boards with crazy bullshit in order to discredit those boards.
Surprised to see this from Now This
Simple. The swamp merely needs to reply with "nuh-uh!", and any and all evidence is summarily debunked.
I don't pay taxes. I get taxed.
Blood money. You do you, but I won't be partaking.
This is where I'm at. Why take on the world's problems if there's nothing you can do? At least now our votes are confirmed useless, so I have a clear conscience when we inevitably go back to proxy-waring the middle east.
Fucking traitors
That singsong voice has the same cadence as ACAB we heard all last year. Hmmmm....
The feds don't care if you rob, cheat, or steal
The feds don't care if you diddle kids
The feds don't care if you literally commit treason by being an intelligence asset for a rival nation.
But threaten their cash flow, and the feds will move heaven and earth to destroy you.
Why do you think they were so hysterical about the evils of DnD and video games in the 90s and 00s? "Games make your kids violent", "Games make your kids antisocial", "Games are addictive", "SeXbox", we heard it all.
Then the 10s came around, and all those narratives vanished almost over night. Why?
They couldn't tolerate a medium that exercised critical thinking skills in kids, and tore them away from the propaganda outlets that were network television. Once social media and internet """journalism""" entered the equation, they realized they could take control of games as well. Now, like TV and Hollywood, mainstream games fall in line with their narratives, so there is no need to scare parents anymore.
Literally who?
I just carpooled with a college freshman kid. We live in a relatively pro-trump area. When it came up that I worked in software, he flashed a biden/harris button at me, as if trying to signal to a fellow enlightened one. Later in the conversation, he said, and I quote:
"After going to school in [redacted southern state], I realized how much better I am than most people. But you can't tell people that because it makes people angry."
This is some next level narcissism that just seems to be par for the course for modern """liberals""".