First, the original post. It links to some video of Tucker ranting about the Founding Father or some such. I didn't watch it, of course:

this country has been a tyranny since at least the early nineteenth century if not earlier but this is still largely correct. (r/conspiracy 3/30/2026)

I've been meaning to post about Tucker Carlson's relationship to the Salem Witches for some time because, well, there is one. But it's not that shocking, more to fill out the historical record.

So I'll have to recreate the short post I put up on Reddit, which evidently touched a nerve They did not want touched. It was that part about the "nineteenth century" that spurred me. It went something like this:

I suppose I would say I'm a fan of Tucker Carlson, but as deep as he thinks it goes, even he doesn't know how deep it goes. And it's not even his own father's association with the CIA or with frozen food fortunes or anything like that.

Dick Carlson's first job was with Louella Parsons. I haven't done the genealogy but I'm certain she was related to Jack Parsons, and that both were descended from a guy named "Cornet Joseph" Parsons, who was around back in the 1600's.

So if you've ever wondered how Tucker could be authentic yet has never found himself suddenly unalived, now you have your answer.

Frankly, it's pretty cryptic. Not on purpose, of course, you just have to have a fairly deep background in some pretty obscure research to have a clue what it means. Really, the most any average conspiracy theorist could come away with is, "I think there's more to know about Tucker than is ever discussed." Even that much of an impact is low-probability.

But even that draws too much attention, because it certainly drew "Their" attention:

After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 1 because you promoted identity-based hate or attacks.

I knew They read my stuff, but this is within a couple hours of posting. At the time of this writing, there were 3 previous comments by the OP and one after mine, which you can read yourself, so it's not like someone reported it because they were outraged at my vague insinuations about Tucker. No, They are reading my stuff right away.

So I post all this as a form of counter-intelligence. Everyone should incorporate it into their view of What Is Really Going On. I mean, they wet Their pants over something with 3 upvotes where 99% of people would have no idea what the comment was about?

Well, They did.

EDIT: I went back and looked at the timestamps and the ban came in under 30 minutes. Clearly, I'm near the top of the stack even on a giant site like Reddit.

First, the original post. It links to some video of Tucker ranting about the Founding Father or some such. I didn't watch it, of course:

this country has been a tyranny since at least the early nineteenth century if not earlier but this is still largely correct. (r/conspiracy 3/30/2026)

I've been meaning to post about Tucker Carlson's relationship to the Salem Witches for some time because, well, there is one. But it's not that shocking, more to fill out the historical record.

So I'll have to recreate the short post I put up on Reddit, which evidently touched a nerve They did not want touched. It was that part about the "nineteenth century" that spurred me. It went something like this:

I suppose I would say I'm a fan of Tucker Carlson, but as deep as he thinks it goes, even he doesn't know how deep it goes. And it's not even his own father's association with the CIA or with frozen food fortunes or anything like that.

Dick Carlson's first job was with Louella Parsons. I haven't done the genealogy but I'm certain she was related to Jack Parsons, and that both were descended from a guy named "Cornet Joseph" Parsons, who was around back in the 1600's.

So if you've ever wondered how Tucker could be authentic yet has never found himself suddenly unalived, now you have your answer.

Frankly, it's pretty cryptic. Not on purpose, of course, you just have to have a fairly deep background in some pretty obscure research to have a clue what it means. Really, the most any average conspiracy theorist could come away with is, "I think there's more to know about Tucker than is ever discussed." Even that much of an impact is low-probability.

But even that draws too much attention, because it certainly drew "Their" attention:

After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 1 because you promoted identity-based hate or attacks.

I knew They read my stuff, but this is within a couple hours of posting. At the time of this writing, there were 3 previous comments by the OP and one after mine, which you can read yourself, so it's not like someone reported it because they were outraged at my vague insinuations about Tucker. No, They are reading my stuff right away.

So I post all this as a form of counter-intelligence. Everyone should incorporate it into their view of What Is Really Going On. I mean, they wet Their pants over something with 3 upvotes where 99% of people would have no idea what the comment was about?

Well, They did.