You assume way too much (little) about my background on the subject. I appreciate a good discussion over debate every single time. Claims about having knowledge isn't knowledge. It's a claim about claims.
Reveal this to me: What distinguishes a gnostic from an agnostic christian?
Is your answer one that contains knowledge from gnostic sources or false assumptions from their critics? A good researcher considers all relevant points.
Youtube videos aren't what I'd call research just so you know.
I've not been given knowledge or understanding by your statements only platitudes claiming to show 'only 1 percent (?)'.
Q: Who/what is 'the 99' to be left and who/what is 'the one' to be found?
I watched the sophomoric "Zeitgeist" video. Now read this and get back to me.
You're a lifetime scholar, so I know you won't 'cheat' and pretend to have read and then critique with ignorance. That's not what OG researchers do, wouldn't you agree?
Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher.
You assume way too much (little) about my background on the subject. I appreciate a good discussion over debate every single time. You reveal nothing to me but claims to reveal.
Reveal this to me: What distinguishes a gnostic from an agnostic christian? Is your answer one that contains knowledge from gnostic sources or from their critics? jWhy is that?
Youtube videos aren't what I'd call research just so you know.
You don't offer knowledge or understanding, only platitudes claiming it. I can see your house from here. Have some knowledge instead. I watched the sophomoric "Zeitgeist" video. Now read this and get back to me.
You're a lifetime scholar, so I know you won't 'cheat' and pretend to have read and then critique with ignorance. That's not what OG researchers do, wouldn't you agree?