These conspiracies are never consistent. They aren't even supported by anything. The link is a BBC documentary about Oppenheimer's later life promoting nuclear nonproliferation (unsuccessfully). How this is evidence that nukes are fake is not specified.

To be honest, it is theoretically possible that the power plants are real while the bomsbs are fake. But it seems kind of silly if this were the case, because then we are saying NPPs exist but no one ever used the technology to build a bomb. On the other hand, if NPPs are fake too, then that is one elaborate conspiracy. NPPs are not everywhere, but they are a lot more places and involve a lot more people than the bombs. At least people can say "well how many people have actually seen a nuclear bomb?" and be sort of right.

There is a somewhat more believable conspiracy that nuclear radiation is less harmful than promoted by the official sources of info. I have no real opinion on that because I have no first hand knowledge.

There is no way nuclear science is fake and I won't even hear it. Only FE tier people believe that sort of thing. So, given that, the energy numbers can be assumed correct. The only real question is whether we can harness it for various devices.

These conspiracies are never consistent. They aren't even supported by anything. The link is a BBC documentary about Oppenheimer's later life promoting nuclear nonproliferation (unsuccessfully). How this is evidence that nukes are fake is not specified.

To be honest, it is theoretically possible that the power plants are real while the bomsbs are fake. But it seems kind of silly if this were the case, because then we are saying NPPs exist but no one ever used the technology to build a bomb. On the other hand, if NPPs are fake too, then that is one elaborate conspiracy. NPPs are not everywhere, but they are a lot more places and involve a lot more people than the bombs. At least people can say "well how many people have actually seen a nuclear bomb?" and be sort of right.

There is a somewhat more believable conspiracy that nuclear radiation is less harmful than promoted by the official sources of info. I have no real opinion on that because I have no first hand knowledge.

There is no way nuclear science is fake and I won't even hear it. Only FE level peoplebelieved that sort of thing. So, given that, the energy numbers can be assumed correct. The only real question is whether we can harness it for various devices.

These conspiracies are never consistent. They aren't even supported by anything. The link is a BBC documentary about Oppenheimer's later life promoting nuclear nonproliferation (unsuccessfully). How this is evidence that nukes are fake is not specified.

To be honest, it is theoretically possible that the power plants are real while the bomsbs are fake. But it seems kind of silly if this were the case, because then we are saying NPPs exist but no one ever used the technology to build a bomb. On the other hand, if NPPs are fake too, then that is one elaborate conspiracy. NPPs are not *everywhere *, but they are a lot more places and involve a lot more people than the bombs. At least people can say "well how many people have actually seen a nuclear bomb?" and be sort of right.

There is a somewhat more believable conspiracy that nuclear radiation is less harmful than promoted by the official sources of info. I have no real opinion on that because I have no first hand knowledge.

There is no way nuclear science is fake and I won't even hear it. Only FE level peoplebelieved that sort of thing. So, given that, the energy numbers can be assumed correct. The only real question is whether we can harness it for various devices.