"Self Assembling Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines Japan Study"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theoretical magnetic nanobot) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wireless. They say it showed immediate increased proliferation and growth of rectangular structures.
2. They tried to incorporate some possible treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Self Assembling Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines Japan Study"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wireless. They say it showed immediate increased proliferation and growth of rectangular structures.
2. They tried to incorporate some possible treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wireless. They say it showed immediate increased proliferation and growth of rectangular structures.
2. They tried to incorporate some possible treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wireless. They say it showed immediate increased proliferation and growth of rectangular structures.
2. They tried to incorporate some possibly treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wifi. They claimed it showed immediate increased proliferation of assembly.
2. They tried to incorporate some possibly treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

1. The Pfizer sample responded to wifi. They claimed it showed a faster proliferation of assembling. Didn't really quantify or compare it with anything though.
2. They tried to incorporate some possibly treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

"Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theorized magnetic nanotech) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Oh and they also responded to wifi, which was the only other interesting finding.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043