How much of our reality is fake?

Taking a measurement (much) into possession (our) contradicts reality aka re (to respond) al (all) aka ones response (potential) to all (procession).

Fake requires ones responding choice to hold onto something (suggested) while ignoring that everything (perceivable) moves.

there's this band that supposedly has existed...

Look into The Beatles while ignoring the actors playing them for the designer... (((Theodor W. Adorno)))

Could it be some kind of an experiment?

Watching anything implies expression (ex) pressing forward (peri) mind (ment) aka the expression of others pressing forward ones mind, while the watcher represses self.

Sleight of hand through Madonna: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature".

I know there are a lot of fake things out there

To "know" implies the process of analysis (setting apart)...broadcasting a "lot" implies a synthesis (putting together).

Nature implies analysis; artifice implies synthesis.

retroactivity

Nature implies action; being implies reaction. Few suggest "retro" to tempt many to mentally hold onto, while ignoring physical action. Anything physically sold as retro tempts one to justify mentally retrogressing.

As for the use of retroactivity to rewrite the past...only within an ongoing line (inception towards death) can one (life) write. It's past and future which represent the fiction corrupting ones real presence.

A presence (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death) while being transferred in-between...yet others can present a past to hold onto and a future to hope or fear for.

the internet is actually much, much emptier than it seems.

So is the world within which there can be only one...cause > effect implies singularity. Only within the same cause can each different effect come into being.

What if they are trying to do the same with reality itself?

Reality implies singularity...plurality (they) implies fiction. THEY aren't trying...ONE fails the trial to discern self when viewing another one (singular) as they (plural).

how many facts and events you have actually witnessed yourself in real life?

a) Fact implies F(icticious)ACT...

b) To be a witness implies sacrificing self as a martyr for others... https://www.etymonline.com/word/witness

The opposite of witness implies participant (being) within whole (nature).

Or have witnessed it. Or participated in it.

Aka fiction (witness) or reality (participant)...free will of choice.

which have never existed before their introduction

Coming into being implies each ones introduction into all...never aka "nothing-everything" represents a suggested fiction tempting one to de-nial/nihilo (nothing) reality.

How much of our reality is fake?

Taking a measurement (much) into possession (our) contradicts reality aka re (to respond) al (all) aka ones response (potential) to all (procession).

Fake requires ones responding choice to hold onto something (suggested) while ignoring that everything (perceivable) moves.

there's this band that supposedly has existed...

Look into The Beatles while ignoring the actors playing them for the designer... (((Theodor W. Adorno)))

Could it be some kind of an experiment?

Watching anything implies expression (ex) pressing forward (peri) mind (ment) aka the expression of others pressing forward ones mind, while the watcher represses self.

Sleight of hand through Madonna: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature".

I know there are a lot of fake things out there

To "know" implies the process of analysis (setting apart)...broadcasting a "lot" implies a synthesis (putting together).

Nature implies analysis; artifice implies synthesis.

retroactivity

Nature implies action; being implies reaction. Few suggest "retro" to tempt many to mentally hold onto, while ignoring physical action. Anything physically sold as retro tempts one to justify mentally retrogressing.

As for the use of retroactivity to rewrite the past...only within an ongoing line (inception towards death) can one (life) write. It's past and future which represent the fiction corrupting ones real presence.

A presence (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death) while being transferred in-between...yet others can present a past to hold onto and a future to hope or fear for.

the internet is actually much, much emptier than it seems.

So is the world within which there can be only one...cause > effect implies singularity. Only within the same cause can each different effect come into being.

What if they are trying to do the same with reality itself?

Reality implies singularity...plurality (they) implies fiction. THEY aren't trying...ONE fails the trial to discern self when viewing another one (singular) as they (plural).

how many facts and events you have actually witnessed yourself in real life?

a) Fact implies F(icticious)ACT...

b) To be a witness implies sacrificing self as a martyr for others... https://www.etymonline.com/word/witness

The opposite of witness implies participant (being) within whole (nature).

Or have witnessed it. Or participated in it.

Aka fiction (witness) or reality (participant)...free will of choice.

which have never existed before their introduction

Coming into being implies each ones introduction into all...never aka "nothing-everything" represents a suggested fiction tempting one to de-nial/nihilo (nothing) reality.