Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have REPEATEDLY been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification in the OJ trial was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of LE and the prosecution.
I presented my data. Blacks do not have the numerical strength required to skew conviction rates for whites in America. This man is whipping up division among the Right based on baseless nonsense.
Why don't you seem to have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have REPEATEDLY been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification in the OJ trial was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of the prosecution.
I presented my data. Blacks do not have the numerical strength required to skew conviction rates for whites in America. This man is whipping up division among the Right based on baseless nonsense.
Why don't you seem to have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have REPEATEDLY been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of the prosecution.
I presented my data. Why don't you have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of the prosecution.
I presented my data. Why don't you have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause black? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of the prosecution.
I presented my data. Why don't you have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?