Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

"COA" as an abbreviation is your own invention, nobody uses it, it makes you look even sillier as you don't realize you're inventing it.

In no way could you be a "COA" when you didn't join the Jewish nation before Christ.

Naaman the Syrian. Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 4).

Ishmael, Midian, and grandson Esau ... were the "COA", but had a different set of covenants and blessings than the bloodline of Jacob.

So you're agreeing with me that different races have different covenants. And Ishmael's land covenant seems to be alive and kicking, despite their rejection of Jesus (1-2 billion Muslims). I wonder why you don't think Israel's land covenant is. You somehow think that the blessings to Jacob were all one (spiritual and national) rather than divisible into ordinary biological and spiritual open to all (as the OT regularly shows).

You still haven't answered how the covenant worked before Abraham. Seems like before then the spiritual covenant was available to all too.

Jews are the "children of the devil"

Only said to a handful of Jews by another Jew who had a million Jewish followers that century and another million Jewish followers right now who call themselves Messianic and worship Jesus. Sounds like you want to make a comment to a single crowd applicable as a national cursing to tens of millions of people indefinitely.

You finally drop your endgame. You believe Jewish Christians have no greater right to the Holy Land than Gentile Christians. Well, I don't argue eschatology, but it seems that in the end where all Christians are agreed then there would be no reason to forbid the Jewish Christians from carrying out their Hebrew culture in the Holy Land any more than we would forbid Chinese Christians from carrying out Chinese culture in China.

Work on that covenant prior to Abraham and see if you're not excluding people that God doesn't exclude.

1 day ago
1 score
Reason: Original

"COA" as an abbreviation is your own invention, nobody uses it, it makes you look even sillier as you don't realize you're inventing it.

In no way could you be a "COA" when you didn't join the Jewish nation before Christ.

Namaan the Syrian. Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 4).

Ishmael, Midian, and grandson Esau ... were the "COA", but had a different set of covenants and blessings than the bloodline of Jacob.

So you're agreeing with me that different races have different covenants. And Ishmael's land covenant seems to be alive and kicking, despite their rejection of Jesus (1-2 billion Muslims). I wonder why you don't think Israel's land covenant is. You somehow think that the blessings to Jacob were all one (spiritual and national) rather than divisible into ordinary biological and spiritual open to all (as the OT regularly shows).

You still haven't answered how the covenant worked before Abraham. Seems like before then the spiritual covenant was available to all too.

Jews are the "children of the devil"

Only said to a handful of Jews by another Jew who had a million Jewish followers that century and another million Jewish followers right now who call themselves Messianic and worship Jesus. Sounds like you want to make a comment to a single crowd applicable as a national cursing to tens of millions of people indefinitely.

You finally drop your endgame. You believe Jewish Christians have no greater right to the Holy Land than Gentile Christians. Well, I don't argue eschatology, but it seems that in the end where all Christians are agreed then there would be no reason to forbid the Jewish Christians from carrying out their Hebrew culture in the Holy Land any more than we would forbid Chinese Christians from carrying out Chinese culture in China.

Work on that covenant prior to Abraham and see if you're not excluding people that God doesn't exclude.

1 day ago
1 score