No definition relevated. And that is not any answer to my question. I see nothing resolutive there, just a guy avoiding a question, and another (i recognize, in good faith) not wanting to see what this is about.

I think what it is about is pretty obvious given 3 non answers by the guy.

So can he define what he meant by white supremacy, or do i have to fake satisfaction for an answer i asked first that was never given? i'm not going to pretend.

I never wanted any fake agreement. Can this guy answer a simple question about his own thread or not? We wasting time looking for fake agreements if he can't or won't.

No definition relevated. And that is not any answer to my question. I see nothing resolutive there, just a guy avoiding a question, and another (i recognize, in good faith) not wanting to see what this is about.

I think what it is about is pretty obvious given 3 non answers by the guy.

So can he define what he meant by white supremacy, or do i have to fake satisfaction for an answer i asked first that was never given? i'm not going to pretend.

I never wanted any fake agreement. Can this guy answer a simple question about his own thread or not?