Such a poor argument. There's an assumption that at any given time, the "smartest people" formed the most powerful empires. First off, most of the empires you listed existed parallel to each other in different parts of the world without destroying each other. The white Christian European civilization dominated the whole world for a very long time. No other civilization achieved global hegemony.
Mediterranean people are still white except for the arabs living in Africa. Have you seen Roman statues and images? Dudes were white, deal with it.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
Great assertion. How do you back it up? Do you think appealing to luck and chance is a good argument when discussing large scale historic events?
Such a poor argument. There's an assumption that at any given time, the "smartest people" formed the most powerful empires. First off, most of the empires you listed existed parallel to each other in different parts of the world without destroying each other. The white Christian European civilization dominated the whole world for a very long time. No other civilization achieved global hegemony.
Mediterranean people are still white except for the arabs living in Africa. Have you seen Roman statues and images? Dudes were white, deal with it.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
Great assertion. How do you back it up?
Such a poor argument. There's an assumption that at any given time, the "smartest people" formed the most powerful empires. First off, most of the empires you listed existed parallel to each other in different parts of the world without destroying each other. The white Christian European civilization dominated the whole world for a very long time. No other civilization achieved that.
Mediterranean people are still white except for the arabs living in Africa. Have you seen Roman statues and images? Dudes were white, deal with it.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
Great assertion. How do you back it up?
Such a poor argument.
Mediterranean people are still white except for the arabs living in Africa. Have you seen Roman statues and images? Dudes were white, deal with it.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
Great assertion. How do you back it up?