wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?

I do question it. Yet, legally she is responsible and accepts that responsibility. If she chose that responsibility as the lesser of two evils, she is responsible for not seeking the good. Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides.

My extended theory is that the Trump administration is not 100% unfriendly to the former or latter cabal, with a combination of proper and misplaced mercy. The current steps often play into the hands of the latter cabal and require us to be more diligent than we were in exposing the former. They will be recognized by greater pattern matching, for which we now have much greater capacity as sovereign individuals. A quibble about 2 names out of 305 will be too small a pattern to be important.

I started warning people about House's work about 20 years ago; I just named him earlier today (click my name). Here I added that his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration. Certainly the cabals in all ages contribute patterns to be matched. But most of the pattern matching we do here is epicentral rather than central.

At any rate, (1) Christians serve Jesus, (2) within that Americans serve the Constitution that names him Lord of the year 1787, (3) within that Bondi is "bond" of/by the EFTA and interprets it administratively. No cabal, spirit, exousia, or confederacy can gainsay that because it is authorized straight from Jesus. It can only be twisted or driven off course. For instance, objective data might falsifiably show that Bondi cheated in her interpretations and spin-doctored the results. But evidence indicates this administration put many man-years of labor into preventing that from happening, i.e., the list is objectively defensible. If one is going to pin more Epstein linkage on Olmert or anyone beyond what the files show, it'll need to be frog research rather than admin evidence.

Add: Let's consider the current status as it informs us of the latter cabal. The former cabal invested trillions in control and has had billions in losses since. The amount of effort required to unmask it led a powerful state actor (presumably the US military) to determine that its best path was to allow a selected leader to be exiled for 4 years for the plan to succeed. If we were to question that datum, the alternate idea would be that the actor and the cabal cowrote a narrative where it only looks like progress on unmasking is happening but the actor eventually releases 3 million pages of evidence and yet nothing earth-shaking is really in the works. In that complicity narrative, the arrests and executions would be perfunctory and minimal and would merely be bit-part sacrifices where the cabal allows its own to be eaten while it carries on business as usual. In the actual war narrative, the difference would be that the arrests and executions clearly demonstrate the end of a cabal and not a transference, that the behaviors such as trafficking are markedly abandoned, that American individual dedication to justice contributes to a continuing state of self-maintenance against the risks of abandonment of potential victims by the community via its overcompensating oscillation toward individualism.

That would give us a test rubric for what actually happens and how much it favors either of two poles of a scenario. More important, it informs our role as sovereigns in contributing to the prevention of satanic abuse in the future in local and global settings. Between America's actions as government and its actions as sovereigns, we must be Jesus's hands and feet to the abused. When he returns he will show which of us have been his adopted body in the absence of his natural body. So part of "occupying until he comes" involves testing admin pronouncements with some capacity for criticism; but defeating the cabal complex for all time requires committing to pursue truth at all costs, and an imbalanced focus on one or two details, especially those already naturally imbalanced by prior trends, is much less helpful than direct propagation of testable truths via facts and logic.

wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?

I do question it. Yet, legally she is responsible and accepts that responsibility. If she chose that responsibility as the lesser of two evils, she is responsible for not seeking the good. Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides.

My extended theory is that the Trump administration is not 100% unfriendly to the former or latter cabal, with a combination of proper and misplaced mercy. The current steps often play into the hands of the latter cabal and require us to be more diligent than we were in exposing the former. They will be recognized by greater pattern matching, for which we now have much greater capacity as sovereign individuals. A quibble about 2 names out of 305 will be too small a pattern to be important.

I started warning people about House's work about 20 years ago; I just named him earlier today (click my name). Here I added that his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration. Certainly the cabals in all ages contribute patterns to be matched. But most of the pattern matching we do here is epicentral rather than central.

At any rate, (1) Christians serve Jesus, (2) within that Americans serve the Constitution that names him Lord of the year 1787, (3) within that Bondi is "bond" of/by the EFTA and interprets it administratively. No cabal, spirit, exousia, or confederacy can gainsay that because it is authorized straight from Jesus. It can only be twisted or driven off course. For instance, objective data might falsifiably show that Bondi cheated in her interpretations and spin-doctored the results. But evidence indicates this administration put many man-years of labor into preventing that from happening, i.e., the list is objectively defensible. If one is going to pin more Epstein linkage on Olmert or anyone beyond what the files show, it'll need to be frog research rather than admin evidence.