If an industry relies heavily on lies to get funding and stay relevant, that calls into question the entire narrative about it, especially in the near term. It's more than just months, AI companies have been playing the "6-12 more months" game for 4 years now.

We are seeing improvements in tools that help programmers and that's to be expected. Being able to actually replace them, let alone the even more enormous jump into autonomous robots (which could somehow replace migrants) is not even in the cards short of some miracle.

They've cranked their AI as far as it can go, spending more than any companies in history on capex. We're at the point some of them are even talking about building their own nuclear reactors because of the high energy demand. This is well into diminishing returns. It's exponentially more money and energy for linear (or logarithmic) gains.

If an industry relies heavily on lies to get funding and stay relevant, that calls into question the entire narrative about it, especially in the near term. It's more than just months, AI companies have been playing the "6-12 more months" game for 4 years now.

We are seeing improvements in tools that help programmers and that's to be expected. Being able to actually replace them, let alone the even more enormous jump into autonomous robots (which could somehow replace migrants) is not even in the cards short of some miracle.

They've cranked their AI as far as it can go, spending more than any companies in history on capex. We're at the point some of them are even talking about building their own nuclear reactors because of the high energy demand. This is well into diminishing returns. It's exponentially more money and energy for linear (or logarithmic) gains.

Companies fooled you by claiming they fired people due to AI, in reality it was 5% of those laid off (not 5% total workforce) could be said to be replaced by AI. And where companies did replace with AI more than half regretted it according to some surveys.

Someone with no knowledge being able to build something is interesting, but if you want production level software that people are willing to pay for, somebody (some human) is going to have to learn how it all works.

If an industry relies heavily on lies to get funding and stay relevant, that calls into question the entire narrative about it, especially in the near term. It's more than just months, AI companies have been playing the "6-12 more months" game for 4 years now.

We are seeing improvements in tools that help programmers and that's to be expected. Being able to actually replace them, let alone the even more enormous jump into autonomous robots (which could somehow replace migrants) is not even in the cards short of some miracle.

They've cranked their AI as far as it can go, spending more than any companies in history on capex. We're at the point some of them are even talking about building their own nuclear reactors because of the high energy demand. This is well into diminishing returns. It's exponentially more money and energy for linear (or logarithmic) gains.

Companies fooled you by claiming they fired people due to AI, in reality it was 5% of those laid off (not 5% total workforce) could be said to be replaced by AI. And where companies did replace with AI more than half regretted it according to some surveys.

Someone with no knowledge being able to build something is interesting, but if you want production level software, that people are willing to pay for, somebody (some human) is going to have to learn how it all works, or its going to crash and burn.

If an industry relies heavily on lies to get funding and stay relevant, that calls into question the entire narrative about it, especially in the near term. It's more than just months, AI companies have been playing the "6-12 more months" game for 4 years now.

We are seeing improvements in tools that help programmers and that's to be expected. Being able to actually replace them, let alone the even more enormous jump into autonomous robots (which could somehow replace migrants) is not even in the cards short of some miracle.

They've cranked their AI as far as it can go, spending more than any companies in history on capex. We're at the point some of them are even talking about building their own nuclear reactors because of the high energy demand. This is well into diminishing returns. It's exponentially more money and energy for linear (or logarithmic) gains.

Companies fooled you by claiming they fired people due to AI, in reality it was 5% of those laid off (not 5% total workforce) could be said to be replaced by AI. And where companies did replace with AI more than half regretted it according to some surveys.