Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

what would break the left/right paradigm

There's only one thing in-between left and right...free will of choice. Choosing either establishes conflict among both. There's no conflict in-between left and right within nature...only balance for choice to adapt to.

Para (besides) digm (to show)...another shows a being sides to tempt choice off-balance.

There is a conspiracy here...

Nature dominates, which gives being free will of choice...that's free-dom aka freely choosing within a dominating balance. A child choosing to stand up and walk represents balancing; others tempting a child to choose one side over another (yes over no; good over bad; true over false; do over don't etc.)...that's the domestication of free will of choice into imbalance.

Choosing any side over another, instead of balancing in-between...binds free will of choice into a lifelong conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason).

To use conspiratorial terms...age of technology + age of reason.

Edit: Left vs right represents a superimposed division (jewish) tempting those within (gentiles) to want to unite (tikkun olam)...

20 hours ago
1 score
Reason: Original

what would break the left/right paradigm

There's only one thing in-between left and right...free will of choice. Choosing either establishes conflict among both. There's no conflict in-between left and right within nature...only balance for choice to adapt to.

Para (besides) digm (to show)...another shows a being sides to tempt choice off-balance.

There is a conspiracy here...

Nature dominates, which gives being free will of choice...that's free-dom aka freely choosing within a dominating balance. A child choosing to stand up and walk represents balancing; others tempting a child to choose one side over another (yes over no; good over bad; true over false; do over don't etc.)...that's the domestication of free will of choice into imbalance.

Choosing any side over another, instead of balancing in-between...binds free will of choice into a lifelong conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason).

To use conspiratorial terms...age of technology + age of reason.

21 hours ago
1 score