I don't slander White people. No evidence. I suppose I call myself a cracker now and then if that counts.

I did ask that rules be enforced and proposed interpretations of those rules just as you do. I'm affirming your civil interpretation and pointing out that it would require you not to use a double standard, which I'd be interested in your response to. [Add: She called your bluff so now she is holding you to that higher standard at your own request.] Or, perhaps you have no intent to ask people to stop saying "nazi" because you really believe the rule should be interpreted to admit broad dehumanization and personal slurs; you have free speech to make that argument too, but I don't think the community would support it.

too much of a coward to draw a cross on a piece of paper

What if someone says they call you a nazi simply because they think your policies are nationalist and socialist and it has nothing to do with your race? That would be the same standard. If the standard is just that Vlad finds these words neutral and those words offensive, without regard to any other view, that standard isn't a sovereign negotiating objectively with other sovereigns, is it?

hung them like they deserve

Do you respect the laws of this country? Do you believe in hanging the children along with the adults? Do you believe in fair trials, plain published charges, the right to confront accusers? Because you can larp that you don't, but that's regarded as calling for violence (including by admin) and is against the old rules that were here all along. Defamation attorney Lin Wood pointed out there's nothing wrong with stating the belief that named individuals have committed capital crimes and should be executed, but that doesn't apply to races or to lack of credible criminal charges.

Porn is an evil, and a conspiracy issue, and serious enough that it shouldn't be compromised with side issues. Name The Jew For Real. Tell them Solomon Friedman is a PornHub partner whose name was scrubbed from Wikipedia; quote his odd views. Don't give me this generic, overblown exaggeration that trivializes the facts. Direct your righteous anger wisely.

Jesus never broke rules, by definition. If one said table-flipping was against the rules (and they did say that about other things he did), we would listen to both sides and make a judgment (which we have). Discussion is welcome as to the nonselective enforcement of the text handed down to us by the prior generation of Conspiracies. Like I said, start a neutral post.

I don't slander White people. No evidence. I suppose I call myself a cracker now and then if that counts.

I did ask that rules be enforced and proposed interpretations of those rules just as you do. I'm affirming your civil interpretation and pointing out that it would require you not to use a double standard, which I'd be interested in your response to. Or, perhaps you have no intent to ask people to stop saying "nazi" because you really believe the rule should be interpreted to admit broad dehumanization and personal slurs; you have free speech to make that argument too, but I don't think the community would support it.

too much of a coward to draw a cross on a piece of paper

What if someone says they call you a nazi simply because they think your policies are nationalist and socialist and it has nothing to do with your race? That would be the same standard. If the standard is just that Vlad finds these words neutral and those words offensive, without regard to any other view, that standard isn't a sovereign negotiating objectively with other sovereigns, is it?

hung them like they deserve

Do you respect the laws of this country? Do you believe in hanging the children along with the adults? Do you believe in fair trials, plain published charges, the right to confront accusers? Because you can larp that you don't, but that's regarded as calling for violence (including by admin) and is against the old rules that were here all along. Defamation attorney Lin Wood pointed out there's nothing wrong with stating the belief that named individuals have committed capital crimes and should be executed, but that doesn't apply to races or to lack of credible criminal charges.

Porn is an evil, and a conspiracy issue, and serious enough that it shouldn't be compromised with side issues. Name The Jew For Real. Tell them Solomon Friedman is a PornHub partner whose name was scrubbed from Wikipedia; quote his odd views. Don't give me this generic, overblown exaggeration that trivializes the facts. Direct your righteous anger wisely.

Jesus never broke rules, by definition. If one said table-flipping was against the rules (and they did say that about other things he did), we would listen to both sides and make a judgment (which we have). Discussion is welcome as to the nonselective enforcement of the text handed down to us by the prior generation of Conspiracies. Like I said, start a neutral post.