Anthroposophy
Anthropo (man) + sophy (knowledge) aka perceivable knowledge flowing through each mans formed perception.
a spiritual new religious movement
Spiritual movement implies all animating each ones mind through motion...others suggest new to distract one from the ongoing flow, and religion to bind ones temporary form mentally (ideals) and physically (idols).
postulates the existence of an objective
Object implies to throw towards... https://www.etymonline.com/word/object
Being (life) thrown (inception towards death) prevents each being from physically perceiving ones inception and death, yet allows mentally discerning ones position in-between.
intellectually comprehensible spiritual
Both intellect and comprehension tempt ones form to ignore mental discernment within spiritual flow. Why? Because intelligence tempts one to gather and comprehension to seize and hold onto which ignores spiritual animation.
Followers of anthroposophy aim to...
Following another and aiming towards outcome tempts man to ignore the origin of knowledge, hence being animated by it.
a mode of thought
Mode/med - "take appropriate measures" confines thought to whatever one took hold of.
Suggested mode (taking suggested) inverts mote (being perception) within motion (perceivable).
Steiner hoped to form a spiritual movement that would free
Hope binds free will of choice towards outcome; it's TO aka being moved TOWARDS, which implies the spiritual movement which free ones choice from one another.
the human capacity for rational thought would allow
a) Misusing mind as capacitor tempts one to ignore being a resistor within generation...whose wanted temptation one needs to resist.
b) Ratio aka reason implies circular conflict aka resistor vs resistor, while burdened by capacity, which both sides fight each other over. Being implies within (life) linear (inception towards death) procession, hence the need to resist want.
contrasted the anthroposophical approach with both conventional mysticism and natural science
Suggested mysticism casts a mist over anthropos (man), while suggested scienctism inverts natural scio (to know, to perceive) aka ones perception within all perceivable knowledge.
Steiner suggested that human beings unite a physical body of substances gathered from and returning to the inorganic world
a) Consenting to any suggestion prevents ones perception from discerning any of this.
b) Being implies essence (life) in-between abstract (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's consenting to a suggestion which shapes essence into substance aka standing under another essence.
Ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion implies trans-substantiation of essence.
in common with all living
All implies the process of dying...each one within implies living. Living within the process of dying implies as each singular unit within singularity...others suggest common-ism to tempt ones consenting mind into a plural consensus.
etheric
Motion (abstract) > momentum (ether) > matter (essence)...ether also represents the spiritual divination aka the division of animation as well as ether/aidh - "to burn" aka the burned offering (holo-caust).
all animals
Anim-al aka all animation for each animated one within...the separation of which is called hue-man (color of man aka spectrum of light/sound).
There's no such thing as "all animals" or a plural of "animal"...only all singular animation for each one within.
self-awareness unique to human beings
Aware implies of one another; self implies through one another...putting self and aware together corrupts uniqueness.
a bearer of sentience
Bearer (inception towards death) of sentience (life) implies all transference of each one within...not what each one carries within self.
Anthroposophy describes a broad evolution of human consciousness.
Anthroposophy delineates a transfer of discernment in-between a narrow/broad human spectrum, which is why each ones perception can broaden or narrow at will.
Others suggest consciousness to lure perception into a consensus, within which each one evolves (turns) against one another.
evolution possess
Taking into possession evolves (turns) into a conflict aka mine vs yours.
become atavistic
Become implies coming into being aka cause animating effect...suggested attavism tempts effect to ignore cause for affection to one another.
If motion > momentum > matter, then attavism tempts matter to hold onto other matter in hopes of learning how it came into being. Like any other suggested -ism...consenting to it shapes circular thought within linear procession.
initially a progressive direction of evolution
Being (life) implies initiated (inception) into a progressive direction (towards death)...which is linear. Evolution tempts a being to move in circles mentally (logic) and physically (reason), while ignoring linear progression, hence history repeating itself.
excessive reliance on abstraction
Aka excessive (life) reliance on abstraction (inception towards death)...abstraction gives access/excess to essence.
Anthroposophy speaks of
Sophy (knowledge) doesn't speak...it moves as perceivable inspiration through each ones perception. Others shape suggestible information into speech to distract from that.
A complex transformation
Transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death) implies a separation from one another...not a weaving (plex) together (com).
Simple implies "free from duplicity; unmixed; one-fold"...the simple mind has to be tricked into complexity aka into burdening itself aka into the synchronicity of sin by mixing ones perception with the suggestion of another.
How would you like supportive questions to be framed?
Away from like vs dislike conflict, which supports nothing but circular confinement, while preventing one from thinking straight.
Anthroposophy
Anthropo (man) + sophy (knowledge) aka perceivable knowledge flowing through each mans formed perception.
a spiritual new religious movement
Spiritual movement implies all animating each ones mind through motion...others suggest new to distract one from the ongoing flow, and religion to bind ones temporary form mentally (ideals) and physically (idols).
postulates the existence of an objective
Object implies to throw towards... https://www.etymonline.com/word/object
Being (life) thrown (inception towards death) prevents each being from physically perceiving ones inception and death, yet allows mentally discerning ones position in-between.
intellectually comprehensible spiritual
Both intellect and comprehension tempt ones form to ignore mental discernment within spiritual flow. Why? Because intelligence tempts one to gather and comprehension to seize and hold onto which ignores spiritual animation.
Followers of anthroposophy aim to...
Following another and aiming towards outcome tempts man to ignore the origin of knowledge, hence being animated by it.
a mode of thought
Mode/med - "take appropriate measures" confines thought to whatever one took hold of.
Suggested mode (taking suggested) inverts mote (being perception) within motion (perceivable).
Steiner hoped to form a spiritual movement that would free
Hope binds free will of choice towards outcome; it TO aka being moved TOWARDS, which implies the spiritual movement which free ones choice from one another.
the human capacity for rational thought would allow
a) Misusing mind as capacitor tempts one to ignore being a resistor within generation...whose wanted temptation one needs to resist.
b) Ratio aka reason implies circular conflict aka resistor vs resistor, while burdened by capacity, which both sides fight each other over. Being implies within (life) linear (inception towards death) procession, hence the need to resist want.
contrasted the anthroposophical approach with both conventional mysticism and natural science
Suggested mysticism casts a mist over anthropos (man), while suggested scienctism inverts natural scio (to know, to perceive) aka ones perception within all perceivable knowledge.
Steiner suggested that human beings unite a physical body of substances gathered from and returning to the inorganic world
a) Consenting to any suggestion prevents ones perception from discerning any of this.
b) Being implies essence (life) in-between abstract (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's consenting to a suggestion which shapes essence into substance aka standing under another essence.
Ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion implies trans-substantiation of essence.
in common with all living
All implies the process of dying...each one within implies living. Living within the process of dying implies as each singular unit within singularity...others suggest common-ism to tempt ones consenting mind into a plural consensus.
etheric
Motion (abstract) > momentum (ether) > matter (essence)...ether also represents the spiritual divination aka the division of animation as well as ether/aidh - "to burn" aka the burned offering (holo-caust).
all animals
Anim-al aka all animation for each animated one within...the separation of which is called hue-man (color of man aka spectrum of light/sound).
There's no such thing as "all animals" or a plural of "animal"...only all singular animation for each one within.
self-awareness unique to human beings
Aware implies of one another; self implies through one another...putting self and aware together corrupts uniqueness.
a bearer of sentience
Bearer (inception towards death) of sentience (life) implies all transference of each one within...not what each one carries within self.
Anthroposophy describes a broad evolution of human consciousness.
Anthroposophy delineates a transfer of discernment in-between a narrow/broad human spectrum, which is why each ones perception can broaden or narrow at will.
Others suggest consciousness to lure perception into a consensus, within which each one evolves (turns) against one another.
evolution possess
Taking into possession evolves (turns) into a conflict aka mine vs yours.
become atavistic
Become implies coming into being aka cause animating effect...suggested attavism tempts effect to ignore cause for affection to one another.
If motion > momentum > matter, then attavism tempts matter to hold onto other matter in hopes of learning how it came into being. Like any other suggested -ism...consenting to it shapes circular thought within linear procession.
initially a progressive direction of evolution
Being (life) implies initiated (inception) into a progressive direction (towards death)...which is linear. Evolution tempts a being to move in circles mentally (logic) and physically (reason), while ignoring linear progression, hence history repeating itself.
excessive reliance on abstraction
Aka excessive (life) reliance on abstraction (inception towards death)...abstraction gives access/excess to essence.
Anthroposophy speaks of
Sophy (knowledge) doesn't speak...it moves as perceivable inspiration through each ones perception. Others shape suggestible information into speech to distract from that.
A complex transformation
Transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death) implies a separation from one another...not a weaving (plex) together (com).
Simple implies "free from duplicity; unmixed; one-fold"...the simple mind has to be tricked into complexity aka into burdening itself aka into the synchronicity of sin by mixing ones perception with the suggestion of another.
How would you like supportive questions to be framed?
Away from like vs dislike conflict, which supports nothing but circular confinement, while preventing one from thinking straight.