You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.

The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.

Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.

Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.

That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.

Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.

Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.

You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.

Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.

That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.

Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.

Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.