I have more practical approach to science. Any fundamental theory should open a multiple roads for technological progress, not close them. QM in that way is practical, verifiable, working and gives useful results. Einstein relativity only close roads without any practical application.

And no, GPS don't need relativity to work at all, those who try to use GPS as a single example of relativity usefulness, just never took a look into how GPS really works and unaware that it is differential system, not absolute one. It does not matter what absolute time is on satellites, the differences between times received from different satellites are used to calculate position. So, even if clocks run sligtly faster or slightly slower, this will give insignificant error (millimeters) in coordinates. Much more important thing is that all clocks on satellites should run with same rate, and this is solved using atomic clocks onboard that work on QM princiles (sic!).

So, from my point of view, QM wins over *R and it is *R that should be changed so that it will open multiple roads for practical technological progress.

I have more practical approach to science. Any fundamental theory should open a multiple roads for technological progress, not close them. QM in that way is practical, verifiable, working and gives useful results. Einstein relativity only close roads without any practical application.

And no, GPS don't need relativity to work at all, those who try to use GPS as a single example of relativity usefulness, just never took a look into how GPS really works and unaware that it is differential system, not absolute one. It does not matter what absolute time is on satellites, the differences between times received from different satellites are used to calculate position. So, even if clocks run sligtly faster or slightly slower, this will give insignificant error (millimeters) in coordinates. Much more important thing is that all clocks on satellites should run with same rate, and this is solved using atomic clocks onboard that works on QM princiles (sic!).

So, from my point of view, QM wins over *R and it is *R that should be changed so that it will open multiple roads for practical technological progress.

I have more practical approach to science. Any fundamental theory should open a multiple roads for technological progress, not close them. QM in that way is practical, verifiable, working and gives useful results. Einstein relativity only close roads without any practical application.

And no, GPS don't need relativity to work at all, those who try to use GPS as a single example of relativity usefulness, just never took a look into how GPS really works and unaware that it is differential system, not absolute one. It does not matter what absolute time is on satellites, the differences between times received from different satellites are used to calculate position. So, even if clocks run sligtly faster or slightly slower, this will give insignificant error (millimeters) in coordinates. Much more important thing is that all clocks on satellites should run with same rate, and this is solved using atomic clocks onboard.

So, from my point of view, QM wins over *R and it is *R that should be changed so that it will open multiple roads for practical technological progress.