The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Great. You realize they were governed by a political elite in the face of the chieftains and everyday people didn't vote for those, right? It's like having a Party at the top but without a leader or a feudal system without a king (the Scottish clans). This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
This is the Christian worldview as presented in Scripture you moron - how is that a scam claim? Sure, monarchs were corrupted by freemasonic bs during the enlightenment and caved in. Just like in the OT, they turned away from God and lost their mandate to rule. How is that a contradiction?
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
It doesn't work both ways because you can't point to a true democracy historically. I have demonstrated to you that your ideal democracy is a pipe dream. Even Plato knew democracy is the weakest form of government because it degenerates to chaos and rule of the passions (muh freedom and muh rights).
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Lol, nice ChatGPT skills there, I totally believe you. You obviously know Quigley well because you red that he was Clinton's mentor which is literally printed on the cover of Tragedy and Hope. I'm amazed by your deep knowledge on the topic. I already told you I don't agree with neither of those guys. On the issue of monarchy vs democracy/republic they are on YOUR side, not mine. Still their writings are revelatory about how the system came to be, the ideas behind it and how it operates. And the funny thing is you support those same enlightenment ideas that have materialized as the status quo in today's system. The classic liberal and democratic ideas are everywhere at all times 24/7 - there's a giant ass masonic statue of the goddess of Liberty (Lucifer) at the gate of the US, a masonic cornerstone in front of Congress and a masonic all seeing eye on top of a pyramid on all your fake ass money and you have the nerve to bitch about royalist propaganda? Where do you get off, you illuminist weasel?
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
How is that relevant? You can call them monarchs if you like but what they rule over is not a monarchy or at least it's not a Christian monarchy but a freemasonic beast system ruled by a technocratic international elite cabal. Do you think I care that the UK has a king? Do you think I support the druid Queen or the fabian globalist Charles III just because they hold the title? If so, you don't even try to understand my position in good faith and you're just strawmanning me.
The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Great. You realize they were governed by a political elite in the face of the chieftains and everyday people didn't vote for those, right? It's like having a Party at the top but without a leader or a feudal system without a king (the Scottish clans). This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
This is the Christian worldview as presented in Scripture you moron - how is that a scam claim? Sure, monarchs were corrupted by freemasonic bs during the enlightenment and caved in. Just like in the OT, they turned away from God and lost their mandate to rule. How is that a contradiction?
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
It doesn't work both ways because you can't point to a true democracy historically. I have demonstrated to you that your ideal democracy is a pipe dream. Even Plato knew democracy is the weakest form of government because it degenerates to chaos and rule of the passions (muh freedom and muh rights).
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Lol, nice ChatGPT skills there, I totally believe you. You obviously know Quigley well because you red that he was Clinton's mentor which is literally printed on the cover of Tragedy and Hope. I'm amazed by your deep knowledge on the topic. I already told you I don't agree with neither of those guys. On the issue of monarchy vs democracy/republic they are on YOUR side, not mine. Still their writings are revelatory about how the system came to be, the ideas behind it and how it operates. And the funny thing is you support those same enlightenment ideas that have materialized as the status quo in today's system. The classic liberal and democratic ideas are everywhere at all times 24/7, there's a giant ass masonic statue of the goddess of Liberty (Lucifer) at the gate of the US, a masonic cornerstone in front of Congress and a masonic all seeing eye on top of a pyramid on all your fake ass money and you have the nerve to bitch about royalist propaganda? Where do you get off, you illuminist weasel?
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
How is that relevant? You can call them monarchs if you like but what they rule over is not a monarchy or at least it's not a Christian monarchy but a freemasonic beast system ruled by a technocratic international elite cabal. Do you think I care that the UK has a king? Do you think I support the druid Queen or the fabian globalist Charles III just because they hold the title? If so, you don't even try to understand my position in good faith and you're just strawmanning me.
The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Great. You realize they were governed by a political elite in the face of the chieftains and everyday people didn't vote for those, right? It's like having a Party at the top but without a leader or a feudal system without a king (the Scottish clans). This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
This is the Christian worldview as presented in Scripture you moron - how is that a scam claim? Sure, monarchs were corrupted by freemasonic bs during the enlightenment and caved in. Just like in the OT, they turned away from God and lost their mandate to rule. How is that a contradiction?
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
It doesn't work both ways because you can't point to a true democracy historically. I have demonstrated to you that your ideal democracy is a pipe dream. Even Plato knew democracy is the weakest form of government because it degenerates to chaos and rule of the passions (muh freedom and muh rights).
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Lol, nice ChatGPT skills there, I totally believe you. You obviously know Quigley well because you red that he was Clinton's mentor which is literally printed on the cover of Tragedy and Hope. I'm amazed by your deep knowledge on the topic. I already told you I don't agree with neither of those guys. On the issue of monarchy vs democracy/republic they are on YOUR side, not mine. Still their writings are revelatory about how the system came to be, the ideas behind it and how it operates. And the funny thing is you support those same enlightenment ideas that have materialized as the status quo in today's system. The classic liberal and democratic ideas are everywhere at all times 24/7, there's a giant ass masonic statue of the goddess of Liberty (Lucifer) at the gate of the US and you have the nerve to bitch about royalist propaganda? Where do you get off, you illuminist weasel?
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
How is that relevant? You can call them monarchs if you like but what they rule over is not a monarchy or at least it's not a Christian monarchy but a freemasonic beast system ruled by a technocratic international elite cabal. Do you think I care that the UK has a king? Do you think I support the druid Queen or the fabian globalist Charles III just because they hold the title? If so, you don't even try to understand my position in good faith and you're just strawmanning me.
The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Great. You realize they were governed by a political elite in the face of the chieftains and everyday people didn't vote for those, right? It's like having a Party at the top but without a leader or a feudal system without a king (the Scottish clans). This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
This is the Christian worldview as presented in Scripture you moron - how is that a scam claim? Sure, monarchs were corrupted by freemasonic bs during the enlightenment and caved in. Just like in the OT, they turned away from God and lost their mandate to rule. How is that a contradiction?
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
It doesn't work both ways because you can't point to a true democracy historically. I have demonstrated to you that your ideal democracy is a pipe dream. Even Plato knew democracy is the weakest form of government because it degenerates to chaos and rule of the passions (muh freedom and muh rights).
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Lol, nice ChatGPT skills there, I totally believe you. You obviously know Quigley well because you red that he was Clinton's mentor which is literally printed on the cover of Tragedy and Hope. I'm amazed by your deep knowledge on the topic. I already told you I don't agree with neither of those guys. On the issue of monarchy vs democracy/republic they are on YOUR side, not mine. Still their writings are revelatory about how the system came to be, the ideas behind it and how it operates.
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
How is that relevant? You can call them monarchs if you like but what they rule over is not a monarchy or at least it's not a Christian monarchy but a freemasonic beast system ruled by a technocratic international elite cabal. Do you think I care that the UK has a king? Do you think I support the druid Queen or the fabian globalist Charles III just because they hold the title? If so, you don't even try to understand my position in good faith and you're just strawmanning me.