They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so.

Hitler maybe? How about the current global technocratic regime which is still upheld by "free elections"? Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.

The people as tyrant over their self. Babbling oxymoron. Kings are tyrants, and fake elections create falsely elected kings.

Have you heard of the concept of public opinion creation and social engineering? Read Bernays' Propaganda, Lipman's Public opinion, Le Bon's the Crowd, read about the Tavistock Institute, read about how the current system works. People can be made to vote for their own enslavement and vote in tyrants to rule over them - where have you been living the past decades?

Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.

Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.

They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so.

Hitler maybe? How about the current global technocratic regime which is still upheld by "free elections"? Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.

Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.

Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.

They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so.

Hitler maybe? Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself.

Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.

Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.

They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.

Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded. All your arguments are ridiculous fallacies.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.

They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.

Pharoah was bad so all kings are bad. Didn't Israel have kings after that? Oh, that doesn't count. Come on dude, this is retarded.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.

They didn't coopt the liberal democracies - they literally created them after they toppled the monarchies through their bloody freemasonic revolutions. All the revolutionaries who created the new republics were freemasons. At no point was there coopting, this was the plan all along and it was paid for by jewish and protestant banks.

You need to read up on history. Go read the Billington book I mentioned. Read Quigley. None of those guys are monarchist and they support the liberal democracies you enjoy so much.