Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You return like a dog to its own vomit.

You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.

What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.

An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.

You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt. But until the day that enlightenment reaches its 5:5 as The Optic, liberty is the only way towards that goal.

Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a RIGGED democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Until then, they trade children and intermarry and so on, to hide their pedigrees from the public's eye. The original eternal principles were twisted by a later infiltration of luciferian theosophist blackhat magicians. So no, I'm not responsible for stepdad when he beats mom either and he's no father of mine.

A rigged democracy is a fake democracy with the intent to PLACE leaders over the public and the longer they can rig it (by media mind control - wake up), the longer they can rule LIKE KINGS and queen Nancy Pelosi, ruling a lifetime. Again showing their real wish for a monarchy you can't influence.

This concept is continued in the chosen 'Social Influencers' of the internet, who pretend to be one of you little common people voicing opinion, when it isn't. It's directed. The cabal is clever this way. Controlled opposition.

You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.

40 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You return like a dog to its own vomit.

You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.

What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.

An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.

You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt.

Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a RIGGED democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Until then, they trade children and intermarry and so on, to hide their pedigrees from the public's eye. The original eternal principles were twisted by a later infiltration of luciferian theosophist blackhat magicians. So no, I'm not responsible for stepdad when he beats mom either and he's no father of mine.

A rigged democracy is a fake democracy with the intent to PLACE leaders over the public and the longer they can rig it (by media mind control - wake up), the longer they can rule LIKE KINGS and queen Nancy Pelosi, ruling a lifetime. Again showing their real wish for a monarchy you can't influence.

This concept is continued in the chosen 'Social Influencers' of the internet, who pretend to be one of you little common people voicing opinion, when it isn't. It's directed. The cabal is clever this way. Controlled opposition.

You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.

40 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You return like a dog to its own vomit.

You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.

What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.

An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.

You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt.

Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a FALSE democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Until then, they trade children and intermarry and so on, to hide their pedigrees from the public's eye. The original eternal principles were twisted by a later infiltration of luciferian theosophist blackhat magicians. So no, I'm not responsible for stepdad when he beats mom either and he's no father of mine.

You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.

40 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You return like a dog to its own vomit.

You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.

What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.

An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.

You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt.

Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a FALSE democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Both 'side's fall for the ruse.

You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.

40 days ago
1 score