The Hapsburgian of the Old World Order empire had the dual eagled monarchy as it's symbol and monarchy as its way.

I spoke with an individual who wrote books for academia and was considered the premiere authority on the Balkans. He considered Germany/Austria his true homeland. He confided to me that he was a dyed in the wool monarchist an opinion shared secretly by many of his colleagues. A monarchist will nearly always find a need to control the church and religions or vice-versa, as occurred in both world wars, as well as countless times in prior history. Our founding fathers knew better than to attempt to weld two powers that were impossible to remove, hence the 'separation of church and state' and 'freedom of religion' that stipulates a ban on both oppression of religion and the establishing of a state religion. The founding fathers had an array of beliefs, many considered 'deist', rather than given a specific denomination for reasons that need to be investigated to understand. Sharia law or an equivalent is the very thing we as a democracy now fight. Interesting that the Christian hero, Jesus, was accused of breaking both religious and political laws. The fleur-dis-leurs of the monarchy adds the military as a three-pronged weapon (spearhead)....against whom exactly? An unremovable principality is absolute power and complete power corrupts absolutely. Look at the churches divide and fight today. If free speech isn't allowed for free minds to find they the people's solution to their problems, then you didn't learn from history, nor understand the solution posited by the founding fathers, and are doomed to repeat.

The Hapsburgian of the Old World Order empire had the dual eagled monarchy as it's symbol and monarchy as its way.

I spoke with an individual who wrote books for academia and was considered the premiere authority on the Balkans. He considered Germany/Austria his true homeland. He confided to me that he was a dyed in the wool monarchist an opinion shared secretly by many of his colleagues. A monarchist will nearly always find a need to control the church and religions or vice-versa, as occurred in both world wars, as well as countless times in prior history. Our founding fathers knew better than to attempt to weld two powers that were impossible to remove, hence the 'separation of church and state' and 'freedom of religion' that stipulates a ban on both oppression of religion and the establishing of a state religion. The founding fathers had an array of beliefs, many considered 'deist', rather than given a specific denomination for reasons that need to be investigated to understand. Sharia law or an equivalent is the very thing we as a democracy now fight. Interesting that the Christian hero, Jesus, was accused of breaking both religious and political laws. The fleur-dis-leurs of the monarchy adds the military as a three-pronged weapon (spearhead)....against whom exactly? An unremovable principality is complete power and complete power corrupts completely. Look at the churches divide and fight today. If free speech isn't allowed for free minds to find they the people's solution to their problems, then you didn't learn from history, nor understand the solution posited by the founding fathers, and are doomed to repeat.