And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.

Come on, dude that's a red herring. Money's not the problem. Money is the solution to the problem of determining value of different goods and services. Man has to do work to sustain himself. If your system makes it so that man doesn't have to work to sustain himself, money or not, it's not how God ordained it and it's unnatural. It's a synthetic system created with the aid of technology.

Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.

Exactly, same as not having to work to sustain yourself. This is why it's a double standard.

I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.

Then people still have to work to produce food? How is that any different than today when agriculture is mechanized and so much easier than in the past?

Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.

No one will ask them. If food production and supply is controlled centrally you will eat whatever you're told to. The majority of people today eat completely fake processed garbage but they've come to believe it's food because of marketing and propaganda. Not only can people be deceived into eating garbage but they can also be forced into it.

That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.

You need a criteria for what's good to do so. What is it?

Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?

Because it's an ideology that traces back to the Enlightenment and I know what it is based on. It's a tradition and not something Klaus Schwab or the skittles jew Harari came up with during a WEF conference. I read a lot of old books and study the origin of ideas, that's how I know.

Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.

When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?

No, that's an oversimplification and reductionism. Not all technology equates to transhumanism. In fact as we read in the Bible, clothes were the first technology given to man after the fall (garments of skin). So just like money, technology is not bad in itself (unless you're a retarded Amish or a deranged luddite).

A more appropriate definition would be changing man's nature according to a man made concept of what man should become. Notice that there's nothing inherently wrong in transcending human nature, because that's literally what Christianity is all about - becoming gods by theosis. The reason why transhumanism is satanic is because it seeks to do so without God - to make us gods on our own merit through our own reason and means. This is literally what Satan did when he rebelled and what he meant when he told Eve to eat the fruit of knowledge and to become like God (hence Apple's logo and Macintosh I costing $666).

God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.

Did God tell man "here, do whatever you feel like, man"? What kind of liberal theology is this? Of course God set rules to how we are supposed to live. He gave commandments and set up His Church to teach all the nations about how to live righteously. What does free will have to do with any of this?

It's absolutely bizarre to hear a Christian think God didn't set strict rules of conduct that set boundaries and limits our free will. Such limits were set even before the fall when God commanded not to eat from the trees of knowledge and life. Then came the Noahide laws, the Mosaic laws and finally, Christ - God in the flesh - came and gave His own teachings. Do you think God is an anarchist? I'm stunned dude, I can't go on even... Just go to Church and talk to a priest because you're very confused about the faith. Read the Church fathers. You're lucky you're in Russia too so it's easy to do so. I'm not saying this as an own but as a fellow Christian. We all need the Church, otherwise we get confused in our own interpretations.

And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.

Come on, dude that's a red herring. Money's not the problem. Money is the solution to the problem of determining value of different goods and services. Man has to do work to sustain himself. If your system makes it so that man doesn't have to work to sustain himself, money or not, it's not how God ordained it and it's unnatural. It's a synthetic system created with the aid of technology.

Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.

Exactly, same as not having to work to sustain yourself. This is why it's a double standard.

I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.

Then people still have to work to produce food? How is that any different than today when agriculture is mechanized and so much easier than in the past?

Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.

No one will ask them. If food production and supply is controlled centrally you will eat whatever you're told to. The majority of people today eat completely fake processed garbage but they've come to believe it's food because of marketing and propaganda. Not only can people be deceived into eating garbage but they can also be forced into it.

That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.

You need a criteria for what's good to do so. What is it?

Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?

Because it's an ideology that traces back to the Enlightenment and I know what it is based on. It's a tradition and not something Klaus Schwab or the skittles jew Harari came up with during a WEF conference. I read a lot of old books and study the origin of ideas, that's how I know.

Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.

When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?

No, that's an oversimplification and reductionism. Not all technology equates to transhumanism. In fact as we read in the Bible, clothes were the first technology given to man after the fall (garments of skin). So just like money, technology is not bad in itself (unless you're a retarded Amish or a deranged luddite).

A more appropriate definition would be changing man's nature according to a man made concept of what man should become. Notice that there's nothing inherently wrong in transcending human nature, because that's literally what Christianity is all about - becoming gods by theosis. The reason why transhumanism is satanic is because it seeks to do so without God - to make us gods on our own merit through our own reason and means. This is literally what Satan did when he rebelled and what he meant when he told Eve to eat the fruit of knowledge and to become like God (hence Apple's logo and Macintosh I costing $666).

God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.

Did God tell man "here, do whatever you feel like, man"? What kind of liberal theology is this? Of course God set rules to how we are supposed to live. He gave commandments and set up His Church to teach all the nations about how to live righteously. What does free will have to do with any of this?

It's absolutely bizarre to hear a Christian think God didn't set strict rules of conduct that set boundaries and limits our free will. Such limits were set even before the fall when God commanded not to eat from the trees of knowledge and life. Do you think God is an anarchist? I'm stunned dude, I can't go on even... Just go to Church and talk to a priest because you're very confused about the faith. Read the Church fathers. You're lucky you're in Russia too so it's easy to do so. I'm not saying this as an own but as a fellow Christian. We all need the Church, otherwise we get confused in our own interpretations.

And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.

Come on, dude that's a red herring. Money's not the problem. Money is the solution to the problem of determining value of different goods and services. Man has to do work to sustain himself. If your system makes it so that man doesn't have to work to sustain himself, money or not, it's not how God ordained it and it's unnatural. It's a synthetic system created with the aid of technology.

Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.

Exactly, same as not having to work to sustain yourself. This is why it's a double standard.

I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.

Then people still have to work to produce food? How is that any different than today when agriculture is mechanized and so much easier than in the past?

Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.

No one will ask them. If food production and supply is controlled centrally you will eat whatever you're told to. The majority of people today eat completely fake processed garbage but they've come to believe it's food because of marketing and propaganda. Not only can people be deceived into eating garbage but they can also be forced into it.

That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.

You need a criteria for what's good to do so. What is it?

Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?

Because it's an ideology that traces back to the Enlightenment and I know what it is based on. It's a tradition and not something Klaus Schwab or the skittles jew Harari came up with during a WEF conference. I read a lot of old books and study the origin of ideas, that's how I know.

Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.

When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?

No, that's an oversimplification and reductionism. Not all technology equates to transhumanism. In fact as we read in the Bible, clothes were the first technology given to man after the fall (garments of skin). So just like money, technology is not bad in itself (unless you're a retarded Amish or a deranged luddite).

A more appropriate definition would be changing man's nature according to a man made concept of what man should become. Notice that there's nothing inherently wrong in transcending human nature, because that's literally what Christianity is all about - becoming gods by theosis. The reason why transhumanism is satanic is because it seeks to do so without God - to make us gods on our own merit through our own reason and means. This is literally what Satan did when he rebelled and what he meant when he told Eve to eat the fruit of knowledge and to become like God (hence Apple's logo and Macintosh I costing $666).

God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.

Did God tell man "here, do whatever you feel like, man"? What kind of liberal theology is this? Of course God set rules to how we are supposed to live. He gave commandments and set up His Church to teach all the nations about how to live righteously. What does free will have to do with any of this?

It's absolutely bizarre to hear a Christian think God didn't set strict rules of conduct that set boundaries and limits our free will. Do you think God is an anarchist? I'm stunned dude, I can't go on even... Just go to Church and talk to a priest because you're very confused about the faith. Read the Church fathers. You're lucky you're in Russia too so it's easy to do so. I'm not saying this as an own but as a fellow Christian. We all need the Church, otherwise we get confused in our own interpretations.