'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. So all should get to correcting the lies given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. Another believes.

As for all answers to all questions: There is only One that can be known. MANY are believed.

If one can't work difficult calculus equations, then it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.

If its metaphysics you need, then study The Tao of Physics that show a connection to theology. You'll be disappointed that it doesn't match your current take, so I wouldn't bother - If I were you.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. So all should get to correcting the lies given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. Another believes.

As for all answers to all questions: There is only One that can be known. MANY are believed.

You can't work difficult calculus equations, so it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.

If its metaphysics you need, then study The Tao of Physics that show a connection to theology. You'll be disappointed that it doesn't match your current take, so I wouldn't bother - If I were you.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. So all should get to correcting the lies given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. Another believes.

As for all answers to all questions: There is only One that can be known. MANY are believed.

You can't work difficult calculus equations, so it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. So all should get to correcting the lies given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You can't work difficult calculus equations, so it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. Now get to correcting the lie you've been given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You can't work difficult calculus equations, so it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right? Accuracy and clarity, aka understanding being the goal, with knowledge of how to get there.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. Now get to correcting the lie you've been given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You can't work difficult calculus equations, so it doesn't exist as concept, right? And is useless. Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right?

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. Now get to correcting the lie you've been given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You can't do difficult calculus so it doesn't exist as concept, right? Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right?

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance. You didn't read, think and learn, but judge anyway, and that is what caused the gnostic to call the willfully ignorant 'The Profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. Put on the big boy pants and do the work.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. Now get to correcting the lie you've been given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You can't do difficult calculus so it doesn't exist as concept, right? Whatever it might be that's being discussed. I can't think it, or refuse to look, so it doesn't exist and work can't be done by it, right?

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance.

'If you start from a faulty worldview..."

Correct. Now get to correcting the lie you've been given by study of the original truths that were twisted.

"If someone argues that Christianity is sun worship''.....they'd get into a strawman argument as is usually the case with literalist interpretation.

One can't debate without knowing the opposite viewpoint and can't judge what is unknown. One knows. One believes.

You project your own weakness. The links I provided detail the metaphysics as well as their SOURCE. You provide dogma and your words are a tangled mess lacking any substance.